
January 16th / 18th, 2009
"Abe, Barack, and the Inauguration"
Barack Obama has never been one to shy away from theatrics. Remember his
rally at Mile High Stadium, replete with Roman columns? Now, as Inauguration
Day approaches, the drama takes on an historical tone for many reasons.
Obama will ride the train from the land of Lincoln, then be sworn in using
Abe’s very own Bible. And why not? After all, Obama is America’s first
black president, and Lincoln is the president who freed men and women of color
out of servitude.
But the symmetry doesn’t end there. Just as when Lincoln took office,
Obama now faces dangerous times.
On that spring day in 1861, onlookers along Abe’s parade route complained
that they couldn’t see the new President because his carriage was constantly
surrounded by armed cavalrymen. Sharpshooters also adorned the tops of
buildings, and security was tight all around in order to protect Mr. Lincoln from
radical Southern racists. Likewise, next week, security for Mr. Obama will
be tight as the Feds prepare for racist lunatics and Islamic terrorists, all
at the same time. In fact, security is so tight that Virginians are up in
arms (no pun intended) because the government is planning to close all highways
leading to D.C. on Inauguration day. (I guess terrorists only live in the
South, because the roads will be open to and from Maryland).
But security and symbolisms aside, Obama’s inauguration has taken on
enormous proportions, of which Lincoln could have never imagined.
In addition to the swearing in ceremony and parade, there are ten official
balls and 94 unofficial balls scheduled for that night. In all, the
festivities will cost over $40 million. Of course, campaign officials report
that the money will be raised by private sources, but there are two problems
with that. First of all, the companies and individuals who donate those
funds could have, instead, designated the money to their local charities, or to
agencies engaged in trying to train and relocate displaced workers. Second,
the standard inaugural press releases fail to mention that Congress has
allocated nearly 30 million of our tax dollars to cover the cost of controlling
and cleaning up after the 2.5 million people who will crowd onto the Capitol
grounds that day.
In all, that’s $70 million dollars being spent to swear in Mr. Obama.
History-making or not, that kind of expenditure is obscene at a time when millions
of people are out of work, and when the country is facing its worst economic
crisis since the Great Depression.
The fact is, if Obama really wanted to channel Lincoln, and show his
commitment to austerity, he would have chosen to be sworn in on the steps of the
Spingfield courthouse, surrounded by family and a few close friends.
Such sensitivity isn’t without precedent. In 1977, the Watergate scandal
was still fresh in our minds. The last thing we wanted to do was to glorify
the Presidency, and Jimmy Carter knew it. And so, he downplayed and downsized
his inauguration to a more respectful and less pompous level.
This is just not the time for our next President to be lavishing in the
trappings of his office. Those of us struggling to make ends meet were angered
when AIG took our bail-out money, then spent a bunch of it on spa weekends.
In like manner, we might not feel so warm and fuzzy about a new President who
throws a $70 million dollar bash for himself.
Truly, Obama’s inauguration will be a proud moment for our nation, and will
go a long way toward healing the racial divides which still exist among us.
But Lincoln healed a nation’s wounds after spending very little on his
inauguration, so success doesn’t have to be preceded by excess.
These are difficult times, in which Congress and the President-elect are
asking us to do with less. If only they would do the same.
|