
February 6th / 8th, 2009
"Obama’s Double Standard"
With the exception of that blowhard Rush Limbaugh, who said he hoped
President Obama will fail, most Americans are pulling for the man from Illinois to
succeed. That’s because we all have a stake in his success. And while I
think it’s unfair to criticize someone who’s only been on the job less than a
month, Mr. Obama has left himself open to legitimate concerns over his aptitude
for saying one thing and doing another. In fact, his pattern of duplicity
began long before he was elected.
Early on in his political career he campaigned as a champion for
inclusiveness.
Yet he and the Chicago machine repeatedly dispatched his political rivals by
employing and/or benefitting from questionable tactics. His first
opponent, a popular incumbent African-American state senator was favored to thrash
the young Obama until her voter petitions were thrown out because the Barack
machine complained that some people printed their name instead of writing them.
A few years later, he upset favored opponents in both the primary and
general elections for United States Senate when their messy divorce records were
conveniently unsealed by two Chicago judges just prior to voting day.
This would be a harbinger of the Obama method that we saw at work in the
2008 primary campaign. Again, though advocating for inclusiveness and
fairness, Obama blocked Hillary’s attempts to count votes from Michigan and Florida
until after the super delegates had defected to him.
During the general campaign against John McCain, and following the Reverend
Wright saga, Obama made an impassioned speech for racial tolerance. After
that, anyone mentioning Barack’s middle name was chastised as being racist and
xenophobic. But after he won, Obama proudly spoke the name Hussein, and
sported his Muslim ties to anyone who would listen, including a reporter from
Arabia television.
The duplicity continued during Obama’s transition period.
He issued an in-depth questionnaire that probed any prospective applicant
for White House employment. One of the questions demanded full disclosure of
any ties to Freddie Mac. Fine enough by me. The only problem is that Obama’s
first act as President-elect was to hire attack dog Rahm Emanuel as his
Chief of Staff.
Emanuel, another veteran of the Daly political machine, had served on the
Board of Freddie Mac while that agency was besieged by problems. So much for
making a break from politics of the past.
And then there was the hypocrisy of Obama’s picks for Treasury Secretary and
for Deputy Defense Secretary. Proclaiming a crackdown on hiring
lobbyists, Obama named lobbyist William Lynn to the Defense post even knowing that
the man had worked in the Department previously, then lobbied for Raytheon,
helping them to secure a huge contract with the government. This, despite
Obama’s statement to CNN back on November 17, in which he said, “I am running
to tell the lobbyists in Washington that the days of setting the agenda are
over. They won’t work in my White House”.
Obama also hand-picked Timothy Geitner to run the Treasury department.
But tax-dodger Geitner is the man who crafted the much maligned bailout to
AIG, which Obama has railed against.
Sometimes Obama’s hypocrisy is just hard to swallow. Like when he lectures
us common folk to tighten our belts, then authorizes over $150 million
dollars for his inaugural festivities. Yes, most of those funds were raised
privately, but Obama should have led by example, and urged his well-heeled
supporters to play down the glitz.
Finally, there’s the bailout sequel and its partner, the proposed stimulus
package.
Obama has argued against earmarks and government pork, yet both of these
plans are loaded with them. The stimulus package is supposed to put
Americans back to work, but examine it closely, and you’ll find some head-scratching
items, among them:
- $150 million to the Smithsonian for maintenance
- $400 million to NASA for earth science climate research
- $600 million for purchase of government vehicles
- $335 million for domestic HIV prevention programs
- $50 million to the Endowment for the Arts to help fund projects in the non-profit arts sector.
That’s over a billion-and-a-half dollars for projects that will not generate
broad-based employment. We would be much better off if Obama just released
that stimulus money to us directly. Each person’s share would come to about
$2,500 dollars, and while such a disbursement wouldn’t create jobs either,
it could at least sustain folks who are struggling while searching for a job.
No one in their right mind wants President Obama to fail, but if we’re going
to be asked to suffer and sacrifice while he leads us out of this economic
mess, then he needs to lead with honesty, integrity, and consistency. A few
more duplicitous moves on Obama’s part, and Rush Limbaugh might just find a
new audience for his loyal opposition.
|