
February 8th / 10th, 2008
"Woman’s Right to Choose at Stake"
For the life of me (pardon the expression) I do not know why abortion is a
public policy issue. In fact, nothing could be more private and personal than
a woman deciding whether or not to continue a pregnancy. Yet ever since the
Roe v. Wade decision in 1973, abortion has been a political flash point in
nearly every election and at nearly every level, from county commissioner to
President. The 2008 race for the White House is no exception, and may turn out
to be the most significant in the history of this fiery debate.
In 1970 a suit was filed on behalf of “Jane Roe” (real name Norma McCorvey)
who claimed her pregnancy was the result of rape. The defendant was Dallas
county D.A. Henry Wade, who held that abortion was illegal in the Lone Star
state.
The case eventually made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court in December of
1971, and was subsequently re-argued in October of 1972. Then, on January 22,
1973, the high court ruled that most laws against abortion violated a woman’
s rights under the 14th Amendment, specifically her right to privacy under
the Due Process clause (ref. Wikipedia). The court decided that abortions are legal
for any reason a woman chooses, so long as they are performed up until the
point at which the fetus becomes viable (usually no more than twenty-eight
weeks).
Suddenly, after centuries of being relegated to back alley butchers and
botched home remedies, women wanting to terminate their pregnancy could step out
of the shadows and seek safe, medical procedures without being tried as a
criminal.
Immediately following the ruling, a Lou Harris poll showed that 56% of
Americans were in agreement with the Court. However, in the ensuing decades
since Roe v Wade, many conservatives have argued that life begins at conception,
and that has spawned heated rhetoric, as well as several attempts to undue
the progress made in 1973. But if the next President is a Republican, it is
a foregone conclusion that the landmark ruling upholding a woman’s right to
choose will finally be overturned. That’s because whoever occupies the Oval
Office next January will likely appoint three Supreme Court judges in his or
her first term, and all three leading GOP candidates have gone on record
pledging to overturn Roe.
John McCain and Mike Huckabee are very specific. Huckabee even tells his
web readers that abortion is the reason he entered politics. And McCain masks
his misogynist leanings by purporting that the issue of abortion should be a
question for each individual state. I suppose if John had been alive in
1860, he would have argued that the Federal government had no right to take a
stand on slavery, and that we should leave it up to the plantation owners in
each state to decide the issue.
Meanwhile, the two leading Democrats, Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton,
support a woman’s right to choose, but it is the former first lady who has taken
the most active stand. According to her website, Clinton believes that having
an abortion is a private decision, and she has championed women’s rights in
that regard. At the same time, Hillary helped to pass the Prevention First
Act which expands access to family planning for low income women, promotes sex
education, and requires health insurers to cover contraception. As a mom,
she also championed the Family and Medical Leave Act, and has worked to
prevent teen pregnancies.
I am not yet endorsing any candidate for President (I am still holding out
hope that Ron Paul will announce as an Independent, and choose Dennis Kucinich
as his running mate), but my advice to women is to vote early and often for
Hillary. If not, you run the risk of abdicating your right to privacy when
it comes to terminating a pregnancy. And, you’ll be putting your body in the
hands of uptight old white men, again.
The issue of abortion does not belong in the political arena, nor should it
be the central plank of a political party. We simply do not need government
in our bedrooms or at our doctor’s offices.
The good news is that the Bush era of spying and lying is coming to an end.
The bad news is that, given his court appointments, Bush has set the stage
for a GOP successor to undo decades of progress. It’s just too bad that we
carried Bush’s administration to full term.
|