
February 29th / March 2nd, 2008
"McCain and New York Times Are Both Guilty"
John McCain and the New York Times are both guilty as sin, but each in their
own way. Let’s begin with the Times.
By smearing McCain based on innuendo, the paper is guilty of sensational,
slipshod journalism. The story cited observations of two, unnamed former
McCain staffers, who believed that the Senator had been romantically involved with
lobbyist Vicki Iseman. Think about that for a moment. Two disgruntled
employees suspected an affair, and the most prestigious newspaper in the world
published their suspicions as fact.
Certainly it is possible that John McCain was having sex with a lobbyist,
but, absent any proof, a real journalist would never go to press with mere
anonymous suspicions. But wait a minute. Isn’t that what the Washington Post did
by protecting the identity of “Deep Throat” while publishing his insider
information about the Watergate scandal? Absolutely not. Deep Throat offered
substantive proof of political money laundering and other crimes. Had he
only communicated his “feelings” to Woodward and Bernstein, then Nixon would
have surely completed his term rather than resigning in disgrace.
There are a few pundits who have speculated that the New York Times is
holding back hard evidence with which to trap and slam McCain after he makes his
denials. But even if that were true, that doesn’t excuse the publication of
unsubstantiated allegations about an alleged sexual tryst.
McCain, standing hand in hand with his wife at a damage control press
conference last week, denied having had an affair, or having used his relationship
with Iseman to manipulate legislation for her clients. So what, then, is
McCain guilty of? His high crimes took place over a decade ago when he and
four other United States Senators accepted millions of dollars and favors from
Charles Keating, a corrupt banker. Keating, CEO of Lincoln Savings & Loan
had invested his depositors money in risky real estate deals. Lincoln went
bankrupt in 1989, and the bailout cost taxpayers over 3 billion dollars.
McCain, and fellow Senators Alan Cranston, John Glenn, Dennis DeConcini, and
Donald Reigle then later colluded to try and have regulators ease up on Keating
during investigation of the Savings and Loan collapse.
Congress launched its own investigation of McCain and his buddies (known as
the Keating Five) and concluded that all five men acted improperly. The
Senate even recommended censure for Cranston and determined that McCain and the
other three men were guilty of questionable conduct.
In the aftermath of the S&L scandal, McCain began pushing for campaign
finance reform, and, in 2002 co-authored the McCain/Feingold Act. Soon, he became
the darling of politicians and media who praised his bi-partisanship. Add
to that a whole new generation of voters who aren’t even old enough to
remember the savings and loan disaster, and you have a version of ethics cleansing
for the Arizona Senator. Put another way, time had healed old wounds. That
is until last week when, in addition to lobby sex, the New York Times article
also dredged up the Keating Five saga.
True to form, the major news outlets have only been interested in the sex
angle. After all, it’s good for ratings. Hardly any of the press, however, has
hammered the conductor of the Straight Talk Express for his serious
violations of the public trust which we all paid for.
Sadly, I doubt that McCain’s new found surge (pardon the expression) in
popularity will be affected significantly by the New York Times article, but it
should. Not because of screwing that he might have done with a lobbyist, but
because of the screwing he gave taxpayers when one of his patrons went
belly-up. John McCain was a prisoner of war in Vietnam, but he is no hero, and
though the Times broke its own rules of ethics, the man they wrote about has
none to break.
|