Commentaries Archive


Shatner to Revisit Khan in Greensboro

Posted March 23, 2026 By Triad Today
William Shatner in 2025

Graphic promoting William Shatner Live On Stage
William Shatner has portrayed James T. Kirk, a fictional space traveler on television and in film since 1966, and five years ago he became the oldest real-life human to travel into outer space. Now his course is set for planet Tanger where on Wednesday, April 15, Astronaut Shatner will discuss his alter ego’s most famous screen villain.

Shatner was born into a Jewish Canadian family in 1931, and grew up in a province where he was bullied by anti-semitic youth on an almost daily basis. Young Shatner successfully defended himself in so many fist-fights that he was given the nickname, “Tuffy”.

Bill was drawn to acting at an early age, appearing in a number of stage productions and TV dramas in Canada before landing a role as Ranger Bob on the Canadian version of Howdy Doody, a popular children’s TV show. He played that character from 1954 to 1959. Broadway, television and film roles followed including an appearance on an iconic 1960 episode of The Twilight Zone in which his character is an airline passenger who believes an alien is tearing the plane apart. From that point forward, Shatner gained steady work as a guest star on television programs like Gunsmoke, Dr. Kildare, and The Man from U.N.C.L.E. until landing the lead role in Star Trek which ran for three seasons on NBC. He would go on to star as the title character in TJ Hooker, the scene-stealing Denny Crane in Boston Legal, and would reprise his role as James T. Kirk in seven Star Trek films. His latest big screen triumph was in 2021’s Senior Moment, co-starring Jean Smart and Christopher Lloyd. Along the way, Shatner has authored 45 books including  William Shatner and You, which will be released later this year. Bill turned 95 on March 22, and has showed no signs of slowing down as he drives from city to city to regale audiences with stories from Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan.

I first met Bill twenty years ago when my wife Pam and I visited the set of Boston Legal. We reconnected by phone last week to talk about his upcoming event at the Tanger Center in Greensboro.

 


JL:  Before we talk about your “Wrath of Khan” event, I want to pay you a compliment, but I’m not trying to suck up to you.

WS: You can suck up. There’s nothing wrong with sucking up to me. [laughs]

JL: I’ve been interviewing celebrities for 56 years and I’m only an expert in one things

WS: Sucking up! [laughter] You’re an expert in sucking up and it releases the tension [laughter].

JL: You’re crude.

WS: Sucking up is a lost art.

JL: Anyway, Shatner’s Raw Nerve, which you hosted from 2008 to 2011, was THE best interview program in the history of television, and you were the best interviewer. I mean that sincerely.

WS: Thank you so much. That may be the nicest compliment that I’ve ever had because I loved doing that show, and I love talking to people and opening them up, and you know what I mean by that. To hear the secret stories that people carry with them and are all too anxious to tell you about them given the right circumstances, was a joy of my life.

JL: You’ll be live on stage on April 15 here in Greensboro to show and discuss Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. Why did you pick that film to present?

WS: Well, I went out with that a couple of times last year and it was a very successful film. It may be the most successful of all the films I was in, and it was a great piece of entertainment. And my memory of it is good.

JL: What can we expect that night?

WS: What we’ll do is play the film for people who paid admission, and it’s a terrific film with refurbished sound and color. And then I come out on stage and sit around and talk with the audience for an hour or more, taking questions. What I’m finding is like talking to you. By talking with an audience, it brings us to a connection, where somebody asks me a question, and I say, “Why did you ask me that question?”, then we get onto a whole other subject. It turns out to be a lovely evening’s entertainment. And I’ve enjoyed it and the audience seems to enjoy it.

JL: I agree that Khan is considered the best Star Trek film, but it was in Star Trek: Generations that fans loved seeing you riding your own horse, after all, you did cameos in a lot of TV westerns. So, tell me, once you achieved some clout in Hollywood, why didn’t you ever make a Bill Shatner western film?

WS: Well, I never felt I had the ability to do that, I mean look at someone like Robert Evans, and even though he had big hits like The Godfather and Love Story, he still had a terrible time trying to get films made. Now I love performing in front of the camera and making films, and I’ve had a great time, but I don’t think I ever had the clout to say, “I want to make a Western.” But as you said, I was in a lot of Westerns. In fact, I learned to ride horses from stuntmen. I mean I learned a lot of stuff by making films including how to roll off a horse. There’s a thing called the “Flying W” they used to do where you twist the horse’s head and that was the cue for him to fall to his side. Well, my leg was under him and I broke my leg. But the horse got up, I got up and I finished the take shaking with pain, and then they took me to the hospital.

JL: No wonder your childhood nickname was “Tuffy”.

WS: Yeah, I was fighting for my life in those days.

WS: I’ve already pre-ordered my copy of your new book, William Shatner and You. Let’s remind folks what it’s about.

WS: Josh Brandon had the idea and brought it to me, and it was “Why don’t we interview people who are interested in Star Trek?”  Instead of my interest in Star Trek, let’s get THEIR interest in Star Trek. So, I interviewed about 30 people. I came across the strangest, most interesting people that are part of this book, and I never expected it to be anything like it is. The people I’ve met are just extraordinary. They have that secret little germ of truth inside them that makes them fascinating, which is in everybody if you can get to the germ of truth.

JL: You have a birthday coming up, and as a fellow senior citizen, I went back the other day and watched Senior Moment which was a delightful film.

WS: Thank you.

JL: At one point in the film your character says to Lloyd’s character, “Why do you hang around with old people?” That put me in mind of something my dad kept saying even into his 90’s. He would say, “I hate old people”. So how old is old? How do you know when you’re old?

WS: You know that’s a great question. The answer to which for me is, you see these heads of studios appointing the creative people who are 25, 30 years old. I mean God, those are kids who’ve only made maybe one film. How do they know what films are going to be successful? And then it occurred to me that everywhere I go, kids who are 10 to 21 have now assumed a haircut that covers everything from their eyebrows back. I mean you can’t see their face [laughs]. All these kids have their hair brushed in front of their eyes, and it’s all the rage, and I, the old guy, I’m saying, “God that is stupefying. You can’t see their face”. But the young guys who are appointed by the heads of studios are saying, “Hey we hired that actor because his hair is in his face [laughs].” So, when you begin to mock somebody with a different haircut than you, you’re an old person. That and having to sit down all the time [both laugh]. That’s my instant analysis. 


 

William Shatner may be sitting down more these days, but he is the farthest thing from old. He’s like the Energizer Bunny who keeps going and going. His mind is quick, he is a brilliant conversationalist, and he is constantly curious about the human condition. I like to think Bill described himself best at the end of Star Trek II, as Captain Kirk ponders the loss of his best friend, whose body has just been jettisoned to the Genesis planet where life springs from lifelessness. Asked how he feels, a melancholy Kirk replies, “I feel young.”

For more info visit WilliamShatnerTour.com. For tickets to William Shatner Live on Stage, visit TicketMaster.com.

 
 


Tourette’s No Excuse For Racism

Posted March 3, 2026 By Triad Today
Movie poster for the movie I Swear

Movie poster for the movie I Swear
If you are easily triggered and offended, or if you believe that there’s no such thing as being too politically correct, then please do not read any further. That’s because this column is about political correctness turned upside down and gone amok.

Late last month, the annual British Academy of Film & Television Arts ceremony was broadcast by the BBC. BAFTA is similar to our Academy Awards, and often foreshadows who and what will win Oscars. Like most award shows, someone inevitably says something controversial during his or her acceptance speech, and then those remarks go viral.

But this year’s BAFTA event made global news for something controversial, which the Academy knew was going to happen, could have prevented, and ended up apologizing for in advance.

The hoopla was begat by the film I Swear,; a story about John Davidson and his struggles with Tourette’s syndrome. Davidson also produced the film and was up for an award, so naturally, he was expected to attend the ceremony. However, Davidson is a man on a mission and his reason for attending was the same as the mission of the film itself, which is to raise public awareness for Tourette’s.

The Centers for Disease Control defines Tourette’s as a condition of the nervous system that causes people to make sudden and repeated twitches, movements, or sounds, called “tics.” MayoClinic.org adds that such tics cannot be easily controlled. The disorder is also known for how it allegedly causes some people to blurt out offensive words, and that’s exactly what Mr. Davidson did several times during the BAFTA broadcast.

His disruptive outbursts included racial slurs directed at African American cast and crew members of the highly acclaimed film Sinners. Afterwards, Davidson and BAFTA were excoriated by the NAACP and by Black celebrities such as actor Jamie Foxx and journalist Jemele Hill. Foxx later posted, “He [Davidson] meant that sh*t…f*ck that. He knew what he was doing.” Hill was particularly critical of the idiots at BAFTA who tried to cover their asses in advance by making an announcement to the audience just prior to the start of the broadcast, saying “John is in the room and you may hear strong language, involuntary noises or movements during the ceremony…such tics are in no way a reflection of an individual’s beliefs and are not intentional.” Said Hill, “Black people are just supposed to be OK with being disrespected and dehumanized so that other people don’t feel bad.”

I agree with Ms. Hill for three reasons. First, BAFTA and the BBC thought they could get away with what amounted to selective political correctness, i.e., allowing one group to be offended while defending the actions of the offending party.

Second, no one at BAFTA is qualified to claim that Davidson’s outbursts were “not intentional.” And that brings me to the third reason. I have a problem with the popular belief that Tourette’s “causes” someone to blurt out offensive language. Author Brian Tracy writes, “Your subconscious mind makes everything you say and do fit a pattern consistent with your self-concept.” Simply put, there is no evidence that any disorder or medication forces someone to use language that is not in their vocabulary. (That was Foxx’s point). Davidson didn’t repeatedly shout foul curse words that could be written off as part of a common lexicon. He blurted out specific racial slurs at Black people. Davidson is a smart guy and a self-promoter, so don’t tell me that his selective blurts weren’t deliberate in an effort to get more attention for his film. Let’s be clear, hate speech is not a clinical tic.

This was supposed to be Sinners big night. It was supposed to be a historic recognition for a film made by and starring people of color. Instead, their celebration was marred by Davidson’s hurtful words and by BAFTA’s cowardly fence-sitting. So how should BAFTA and the BBC have handled the situation? Knowing the potential for a disaster to happen, they should have arranged for a VIP area where Davidson and his party could have viewed the proceedings in private. Problem averted.

If my questioning of Davidson’s motives proves to be unfounded, and if one day science proves that Tourette’s made him call Black people the “N” word, then I apologize in advance.

Hey, it worked for BAFTA.

 
 


Remembering the Rev. Jesse Jackson

Posted February 24, 2026 By Triad Today
Rev. Jesse Jackson on the set of Triad Today

Rev. Jesse Jackson on the set of Triad Today with Jim Longworth in 2018
Jesse Louis Jackson was born in Greenville, South Carolina, but folks in these parts claim him as a native son because he graduated from N.C. A&T State University. In fact, Jackson will tell you that he found himself at A&T, where he was a star football player, student body president, and leader of a movement to integrate public facilities and businesses in Greensboro.

Jackson went to work with Dr. Martin Luther King in 1965 and, in 1967, took over the Chicago-based “Operation Bread Basket,” where he was successful in persuading area companies to hire minorities. He became an ordained minister following Dr. King’s assassination, then founded Operation P.U.S.H. (People United to Serve Humanity) in 1971. He organized the Rainbow Coalition in 1984, and merged the two groups in 1996. Rev. Jackson ran for president in 1984 and again in 1988 (winning an astounding 13 primaries that year), and over the years, he has been instrumental in freeing scores of hostages from foreign adversaries.

For the better part of seven decades, Jackson used his voice to speak for underrepresented populations and to advocate for improved access to healthcare and employment. He also opened doors for people of color to run for and win elected office. Affected by the ravages of Parkinson’s over the past 10 years, Jackson’s voice grew softer, but there was still power in his words. Jesse Jackson passed away in the early morning of February 17. He was 84 years old.

In May of 2018, I had the honor and privilege to spend time with Rev. Jackson when he appeared on my Triad Today television show. He was in Greensboro to deliver the baccalaureate address at Bennett College, a contingent from which filled the ABC45 studio to watch our interview being recorded. On that day, Rev. Jackson was greeted like a rock star by a large, enthusiastic, and mostly female studio audience. He stopped to shake hands and have photos taken with everyone, and gave my wife Pam a big hug before ascending to the stage. I asked him, “What IS it with you and women?” “We have an understanding,” he replied with a smile.

Jackson was 76 years old then, and Parkinson’s had slowed his stride and softened his once booming voice, but his words were still filled with the fervor of a man on a mission of economic empowerment and racial unity. During our 25-minute conversation, Rev. Jackson talked about his early days at A&T, working with Dr. King, his two runs for the presidency, gun violence, racial profiling, social media, and Donald Trump. Here are some highlights.

 


JL: You played football, baseball, and basketball in high school. Which was your favorite?

JJ: Football ultimately because that’s how I got my scholarship.

JL: But which sport were you better at?

JJ: Maybe baseball, but football was my meal ticket.


 
JL: Everyone knows about the Greensboro Four who staged the first lunch counter sit-in, but folks forget that it was you who organized “wade-ins” at all-white swimming pools, “watch-ins” at segregated movie theatres, and more.

JJ: The real deal was when the four brothers made that gallant step, but then the Bennett women sustained it. They showed the strength and courage to follow through.


 
JL: Dr. King was sort of like a father to you. What did you learn from him?

JJ: Strong minds bring strong change. You have to study diligently and study every day, and pray fervently, and have the courage of your convictions.


 
JL: You did well in the 1984 and 1988 primaries, but didn’t win the nomination. Why didn’t you run as an independent?

JJ: I was trying to honor the system. We wanted to expand the base of Democrats at that time. One of my concerns then and now is that people must run for change, not just run for themselves.


 

A special edition of Triad Today with the Rev. Jesse Jackson, airs this Sunday night at 8 o’clock, on MY48 (cable channel 15).

 
 


GPD Should Promote From Within (Again)

Posted February 17, 2026 By Triad Today
Greensboro Police Department logo

Logo of Greensboro Police
For the fourth time in the past 10 years, Greensboro is looking for a new police chief, and for the fourth time in a row, the city has hired the same company to help find a replacement. That company is Chapel Hill based Developmental Associates and their services in conducting a national talent search don’t come cheap. But here’s the rub. Every time Greensboro calls on Developmental Associates to search far and wide for a new police chief, the city ends up tapping someone from within the GPD’s own ranks to lead the department. Wayne Scott was chosen for the top spot in 2015, Brian James in 2020, and John Thompson in 2022, and all three were long-time GPD veterans. I happen to have agreed with those hiring decisions, but we didn’t need to pay a search firm to tell us what we already knew.

So here we go again. Chief John Thompson is retiring, and Developmental Associates is going to collect a huge fee for conducting a national search for his successor. That would be OK with me if Thompson had fostered an atmosphere of corruption or discontent within the GPD, necessitating that the city seek new leadership from the outside. But Thompson has been an exemplary chief who nurtured effective leadership skills in those under his command, including Stephanie Mardis.

Mardis joined the GPD 24 years ago and was promoted to assistant chief in 2023. I first met Stephanie when she appeared on my Triad Today show back in March 2024, and it only took me a few minutes to realize that she would one day make a fine chief of police. What follows are excerpts from our conversation.

 


JL: Who or what inspired you to pursue a career in law enforcement?

SM: My father was one of the first African American police officers in Tampa, Fla., and my mom was a nurse at the Hillsborough County jail. I originally wanted to pursue a career in medicine, so I was a biology/chemistry major at Bennett College. I think the foundation of growing up in a family of public servants was a good role model, so I knew I wanted to do something impactful once I graduated. That’s when I decided to apply to the Greensboro Police Department, and I’ve been here since 2002.

JL: Not long ago we went through civil unrest following the George Floyd tragedy, and police departments across the country saw a decline in folks wanting to go into law enforcement. How are things now?

SM: We have made progress with our recruiting and retention. We recently had 36 recruits attend our academy, and of those 36, 27% were female.

JL: Is that related to the “30 by 30” pledge?

SM: Yes. Law enforcement agencies across the nation are striving to have 30% of their force comprised of women by the year 2030. Right now, the Greensboro Police Department is above the national average, which is 12% female. We’re already at 20%.

JL: Why is that initiative so important?    

SM: Representation matters in every aspect of society, and it shows progress when you have a law enforcement agency that is a reflection of the community it serves. Greensboro is a vibrant culture with rich history, so it fosters trust and partnership when we have a police department that actually reflects the population.



 

As I said, Stephanie Mardis will make a great chief of police someday. As far as I’m concerned, that day has come.

 
 


Americans Need a Voting License

Posted February 10, 2026 By Triad Today
ballot box

Ballot box
There’s no doubt that our nation is ruled by elites, but then, it always has been. The founding fathers were all highly educated men with (pardon the expression) revolutionary ideals, but they also believed that only landowners should have the right to vote and hold office. Today, that way of thinking would disenfranchise tens of millions of people who pay rent instead of a mortgage. Still, there should be some criteria for being able to participate in the political process. As it stands now, there are only a few restrictions on voting privileges, among them: you must be registered, you must be a citizen, you must not be a felon, and you must have voted in a recent election. The problem is that these criteria have everything to do with procedure and nothing to do with competence.

To that point, Georgetown University professor Jason Brennan believes that most voters are ignorant, biased, and misinformed. His solution is for our democracy to operate as an “epistocracy” whereby the right to vote is conditional on knowledge. Brennan suggests we establish some type of national competency exam to determine whether an individual is capable of casting an informed vote. Under his proposal, we could either use the United States citizenship test, or develop something new, so long as it is drafted in a non-partisan manner and not based on the ideologies of any one political party or group. It’s a sound approach, and one that party hacks in Georgia should have heeded.

Not long ago, the Republican Party of Catoosa County, Georgia, required all potential GOP candidates to answer a series of ideological questions in order to get on the ballot under the party banner. However, candidates whose responses were rejected by party leaders and who were kept off the ballot as a result ended up suing the county. The rejected candidates prevailed, the GOP paid hefty fines, and their loyalty test was scrapped. Today, political parties require candidates to sign a loyalty oath, but that doesn’t ensure a competent slate of candidates, just as registering to vote doesn’t ensure a competent electorate, and that brings me back to the concept of a national voting license.

According to a survey by the Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation, only one in three Americans would be able to pass the U.S. citizenship test, and according to goodparty.org, “Americans can’t even pass a standard civics test” adding, “Voter education is not just an accessory to the democratic process, but rather the cornerstone upon which a thriving democracy is built.”

Voter ignorance wasn’t much of a problem a hundred years ago because civics education was required at every grade level. The Heritage Foundation recalls a textbook from 1928, which stated that civics classes “strive to develop character in the student and produce an effective citizen.” Today, 30 states require only one semester of civics in order to graduate high school, while 11 states require no civics at all. Only nine states require a full year of civics in order to graduate. Clearly, we need to do a better job of teaching students how to understand and navigate our system of government, but until then, we shouldn’t be content to let millions of uninformed voters determine the outcome of local, State, and federal elections. That’s why every state should require its citizens to pass a basic knowledge exam before being issued a voting license, which, like DMV licenses, would have to be renewed periodically.

I don’t want to be on the highway next to someone who is unqualified to drive, and I don’t want to be at the polls next to someone who is too uninformed to vote. Both scenarios have dangerous consequences.

 
 


Still No Accountability for School Mess

Posted January 27, 2026 By Triad Today
Logo of Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools on the facade of an office building

Logo of Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools on the facade of an office building
If a local, publicly owned industry were to misspend and lose $46 million, putting over 300 people out of work, there are several important things that we expect would happen. First, we expect debts to be paid and the losses to be recovered. Second, we expect that the lost jobs will be restored. Third, we expect the company to enact necessary reforms to prevent future debacles. Fourth, we expect the company to do all it can to rebuild the public trust. And finally, WE EXPECT ANYONE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MESS TO BE PUNISHED!!!

I am, of course, referring to the largest publicly-owned industry in our community—the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools, and the devastating financial crisis its leadership caused. Yes, there are folks who say, “It’s time to move on.” “It’s time to put those troubles behind us and focus on the future.” The problem is that it’s nearly impossible to move on without closure, and we can’t have that unless and until the guilty parties are brought to account.

Last spring, it was discovered that WS/FCS CFO Tommy Kranz had, over a period of several years, misappropriated and misapplied local, state, and federal funds, leaving the schools in a $46 million hole. That left us unable to pay employees and vendors, or to reimburse the county for SROs and other services. It even left us unable to pay the interest on what we owed to the N.C. Department of Public Instruction. Kranz suddenly retired and got the hell out of Dodge. So did Superintendent Tricia McManus. It was an easy departure for the duo because neither had deep ties to the Triad. McManus kept her permanent residence in Florida while working here, and Kranz had come here from Virginia, where, according to the Richmond Free Press, he had engaged in the same kind of behavior that would repeat itself in Winston-Salem. More on that in a moment.

By late last year, auditors and local prosecutors concluded that no crime had been committed, but they were wrong. True enough, there is no evidence to suggest that Kranz, McManus, or members of the school board profited financially from the multi-million-dollar mess. Nevertheless, according to state law, misappropriation of public funds still falls under the category of embezzlement. The truth is that Kranz deliberately moved funds around in an illegal fashion and caused irreparable harm to over 300 families and to the community at large. The other hard truth is that neither McManus nor the school board bothered to do a deep dive on Kranz’s record in Richmond, Virginia where he had served as CFO and interim superintendent, and where (according to the Richmond Free Press) he kept $8.3 million in a secret “unassigned fund balance” while asking city council to pony up an additional $16 million to make up for budget shortfalls. At the same time, he paid a friend $24,000 for two months of consulting work even though that man was still under investigation by Maryland authorities. When all of this finally came to light, Kranz was fired. Had McManus and the board done their due diligence, Kranz would have never been hired in the first place.

Our community is fortunate to have organizations like the Winston-Salem Foundation and companies like Modern Auto, which stepped up with major donations to help erase the school’s debts and lend a hand to teachers. And we look forward to newly-appointed superintendent Don Phipps taking on the task of reform. He has a sterling reputation and a track record to suggest that he can restore the WS/FCS to a level of performance that we haven’t seen since the days of Dr. Don Martin, who led the schools for 19 unsullied years.

And yet, there’s still the matter of closure. Kranz was incompetent, and McManus was a very compassionate and trusting individual who allowed Kranz to operate in a vacuum. Their shortcomings were dissimilar to be sure, but together they perpetrated an unprecedented crime on our community. They should both be held to account for the damage they caused. Then and only then can we put this ugly chapter behind us and be assured that it will never happen again.

 
 


Berger Desperate to Retain Power

Posted January 13, 2026 By Triad Today

NC State Senator Phil Berger
Negative political campaigning is nothing new. In the presidential election of 1800, John Adams’ camp warned Jefferson voters, “Are you prepared to see your dwellings in flames, female chastity violated, and children writhing on the pike?”  And in 1828, Adams’ son John Quincy issued a handbill that said, “General [Andrew] Jackson’s mother was a common prostitute.” Believe it or not, I wasn’t around for those dirty campaigns, but I do remember the controversy surrounding LBJ’s 1964 network TV ad that implied a vote for Goldwater would result in nuclear war with Russia and the end of civilization.

And while presidential elections seem to bring out the worst in some candidates, mudslinging also occurs in down-ballot contests. In fact, the stakes are frequently much higher in local races. That’s because state legislators are the folks who draw and redraw district maps, which often pre-determine outcomes and help incumbents remain in office, and that brings me to Republican Sen. Phil Berger and his quest to hold onto power by any means necessary.

Berger has represented Rockingham and Guilford counties for the better part of 25 years, and as Senate president pro tempore, he is considered the most powerful political figure in North Carolina. Again, thanks to gerrymandering, Berger has always been a shoo-in to win re-election. But 2026 is different. For the first time ever, Berger is being challenged by a powerful opponent within his own party, and for the first time ever, he is running scared.

Berger’s primary opponent is the popular, long-serving Rockingham Sheriff Sam Page, who, according to recent polls, holds a surprisingly comfortable lead over Berger.

That’s why Berger tried desperately to dissuade Page from even filing for office, including allegedly dispatching Sen. Amy Galey to Sam’s house with a letter demanding that the sheriff not run for the legislature. The dissuasion campaign also included a series of scurrilous TV ads accusing Page of everything except the Kennedy assassination. The pressure didn’t work, and Page still filed to run in the March 3 primary. That triggered over a million dollars worth of negative TV ads against Page, and a so-called investigation by the SBI into the way the sheriff had handled vending machine proceeds in his office. Interestingly, the charges against Page were advanced by none other than Rockingham County Commissioner Kevin Berger, son of the incumbent senator. That may not represent a direct conflict of interest, but it sure as hell represents nepotism at its sleaziest. The younger Berger defended his actions, saying, “I have a job to protect the taxpayer.” Thanks, Kevin. We all feel grateful that you’ve uncovered a check for under $60, which Page allegedly used for “Taking people out to eat.”

Last month, the Winston-Salem Journal’s Scott Sexton reported that Berger had about $1.7 million dollars in his campaign coffers while Page had raised a mere $24,000.

That disparity begs the question: Just how desperate do you have to be to spend millions of dollars to hold onto a job that only pays $30,000 per year? The answer is “pretty desperate.”

If Page upsets Berger and wins the primary, it will have been against overwhelming odds. But take heart, Phil. If you lose, maybe Sam will take you out to eat with some of his vending machine money.

 
 


Barbara Johns replaces Robert E. Lee

Posted January 6, 2026 By Triad Today
Statue of Barbara Johns in the US Capitol

Statue of Barbara Johns in the US Capitol
Hall of Fame baseball player Johnny Bench once told me that you’re never too old to have heroes. One of mine is Barbara Johns, and I’m proud to say that as of last month, a bronze sculpture of her stands in the U.S. Capitol, replacing a statue of Confederate general Robert E. Lee, and representing the state of Virginia.

Barbara Johns wasn’t just a participant in the Civil Rights Movement, she triggered it. Barbara made her mark before Rosa Parks boarded a bus, before Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. marched, and before the Greensboro Four sat at the lunch counter. Barbara led a national movement for equality, and she did it at the ripe old age of 16.

In 1951, Barbara Johns was a junior at Moton High, an all-Black school in the Prince Edward County Virginia town of Farmville. She was an exemplary student who enjoyed English, history, French, and music, and was a member of the debate team. Barbara was mature beyond her years and had a sense of social justice that was inspired by her uncle, The Rev. Vernon Johns, who, at the time, was pastor of Dexter Ave. Baptist Church in Montgomery, Ala. (he would be succeeded in that role by Dr. King in 1952).

Built in 1939, Moton was a small brick structure designed to hold 180 students, but by 1951, over 450 children were crammed into the school. Not only was the building overcrowded, it was also woefully inadequate for learning. There was no library, no cafeteria, no gym, and no science lab. To alleviate the overflow of students, the Prince Edward school board had several tar paper shacks erected adjacent to the main building. On rainy days, water poured through the leaky roofs, and on cold days, students had to make do with a small stove. The stove was riddled with holes, and hot coals would often pop out onto the floor. By contrast, just down the road stood the all-white high school, which had the best of everything. In those days, the concept of separate but equal was a cruel joke. Schools were separated by race for sure, but they were sure as hell not equal.

Fittingly, the base of the new statue is engraved with this quote from young Ms. Johns, “Are we going to just accept these conditions, or are we going to do something about it?” Well, Barbara did something about it. More on that in a moment.

I began researching the Moton school saga nearly 30 years ago. Barbara had passed away by then, but I connected with some of her family and friends and was able to get a copy of Barbara’s unfinished manuscript soon after it was discovered in 1999. In it, Barbara wrote of the long walks she would take in the woods, contemplating the conditions of her school and of her dreams for a better one.

“I imagined that a great storm came through and blew down the main building and splattered the shacks to splinters, and out of this wreckage was a magnificent building, and the students were joyous. Then the reality would set in, and I would acknowledge that nothing magical was going to produce a new school. I prayed to God, ‘Please let us have a new place where we won’t have to keep our coats on all day to stay warm. God, please help us. We are your children, too.’”

Barbara then wrote about a defining incident that convinced her to take action.

“One morning I was rushing around helping my brother and sister get down the hill to catch the bus, but I had forgot my lunch. I ran back up the hill to retrieve it, but in the meantime the bus had left. Later, the white school bus drove by. It was half empty and would have to drive past my school to get to the white school, but they wouldn’t let me ride with them. Right then and there I decided something had to be done about this inequality.”

The action Barbara took would help trigger a national movement to provide an equal education for all students. On April 23, 1951, she enacted a carefully devised plan. First, she got the school principal out of the building on a ruse, then she enlisted the aid of seven other students to deliver bogus notes to every teacher, advising them to have their students assemble in the auditorium. Barbara then addressed the student body and convinced them to stage a walkout. On the second day of the strike, Johns and a large group of students marched to the superintendent’s office, where Barbara asked why Black students couldn’t just attend school with whites. The superintendent said that integration was against Virginia law, but promised that a new school was in the works for the Moton students. He lied about the new school. Even worse, he punished the protesting students by taking all of their buses out of commission. The strike lasted for two weeks, during which time Barbara received death threats.

Barbara wrote to the NAACP and asked for help. Soon after, two attorneys arrived in Farmville to meet with Barbara and other student leaders. Eventually, their case was folded into Brown v. Board of Education, and by 1959, Prince Edward County schools were ordered to desegregate. But the racist county school board refused to comply, and they got around the law by closing all of their public schools, then opened a make-shift private academy just for the white students to attend. Black students in the area became known as The Lost Generation because they were without a school for five years. Finally, in 1964, all public schools in Farmville were reopened when the Supreme Court ruled that Prince Edward’s racist scheme violated the 14th Amendment by denying Black students equal protection under the law. Still, it would be another 20 years before the county’s schools were fully integrated. Nevertheless, the state of public education had changed forever, and, in large part, we all have a 16-year-old girl to thank for it.

Barbara Johns was a visionary and an activist, and if there was a Mt. Rushmore of Civil Rights leaders, she would be on it. For now, we’ll settle for having her likeness in the nation’s Capitol.  

(The original Moton school has since been restored and today serves as a museum and a venue for community events. For more information or to make a donation, visit MotonMuseum.org).

 
 


Plenty of Ways to Give This Holiday Season

Posted December 16, 2025 By Triad Today
Hand offering holiday gift to charity

Hand offering holiday gift to charity
As we celebrate this holiday season, let’s not forget that there are people beyond our immediate circle of family and friends who are suffering, and could benefit from our love and generosity. Over the past two decades, I’ve been able to showcase scores of community organizations on my Triad Today television show, and in the process, I’ve learned that there are several ways we can help these agencies help others. The first is to donate goods. Second is to donate money. And, third is to donate our time. Of course, some nonprofit groups can benefit from all three types of giving. Here, in no particular order, are just a few organizations to which you might lend your support.

Second Harvest Food Bank of Northwest NC: Even prior to the pandemic, the Piedmont Triad had one of the worst food insecurity problems in the nation, and that included the problem of childhood hunger. Now, with thousands more of our neighbors in need, the problem has worsened, including for children. To help alleviate the hunger problem, Second Harvest Food Bank has stepped up its efforts to distribute food to nonprofit agencies who feed hungry people in an 18-county area. The Food Bank has also partnered with a number of area companies to provide meals for kids. You can write a check directly to the food bank, or you can drop off non-perishable food items at a number of locations in our area. For more information call 336-784-5770, or visit SecondHarvestNWNC.org.

Cancer Services, Inc.’s stated mission is “to enhance quality of life for those living with cancer, and to provide the gift of life through education.” Their services include patient advocacy, financial assistance, providing equipment and supplies, offering peer support groups, and much more. Ninety percent of funds donated to Cancer Services, Inc. goes directly to providing client services. In addition to money, you can also donate used equipment and supplies. Call 336-760-9983, or visit CancerServicesOnline.org.

Greensboro Urban Ministry is on the front lines when it comes to providing emergency assistance. Greensboro Urban Ministry provides homeless families in Guilford County with a safe, temporary environment. Volunteers are needed to prepare and serve meals, manage shelters, tutor children, and perform a variety of other duties. Monetary donations are also much appreciated. Call 336-271-5959, or visit GreensboroUrbanMinistry.org.

Mountain Valley Hospice is a nonprofit agency that serves an 18-county area in North Carolina and Virginia, and provides personalized care for patients at the end of life, as well as comfort to families. Mountain Valley Hospice has offices throughout the region, and operates two hospice homes. They also specialize in care for terminally ill children and veterans, and offer grief support for kids and adults. To give money or inquire about volunteering, call 1-888 789-2922, or visit MtnValleyHospice.org.

The Petty Family Foundation: NASCAR legend Richard Petty and his family support a number of charitable organizations including Paralyzed Veterans of America and Victory Junction Camp, the latter of which provides an uplifting experience for children with severe disabilities and terminal illnesses. To make a donation or learn more, visit PettyFamilyFoundation.org.

Shift_ed provides qualified students with college scholarships and much more. Shift_ed also provides students with support services that are designed to help them be successful in life. Their equity-based program begins in kindergarten and includes everything from tutoring to career counseling. Shift_ed relies in part upon donations from companies and individuals. To learn more about scholarships, or to make a donation, visit Shift-ed.org.

Carolina Donor Services and Red Cross… There can be no greater gift this holiday season than the gift of life, and that’s why you might consider donating blood and signing a donor card. Either gesture requires only a few minutes of your time, and will almost certainly result in saving someone’s life in the future. You can reach Carolina Donor Services at 1-800 200-2672, or CarolinaDonorServices.org. You can call the Red Cross at 336-333-2111, or visit them online at RedCross.org.

Please remember that your donations of time, money, or goods to area community organizations are vitally important, not just now, but throughout the coming year. It’s also a way for us to expand the circle of people we care about, and that’s something worth celebrating in this season of giving.

 
 


Happy 100th Birthday Dick Van Dyke!

Posted December 9, 2025 By Triad Today
Actor Dick Van Dyke in 2009

Actor Dick Van Dyke (with Jim Longworth, left) in 2009
On June 19, 2009, I had the honor of producing and hosting “A Father’s Day Salute to TV Dads” at the Television Academy’s Leonard Goldenson Theatre in Los Angeles.

Aside from the Emmys and the Television Hall of Fame awards, it was the largest gathering of stars for any academy event and the highlight of my broadcasting career.

On that special evening, I gathered together nine iconic TV dads to discuss their lives and careers. Panelists included Bryan Cranston (Breaking Bad), Patrick Duffy (Dallas), Michael Gross (Family Ties), Stephen Collins (7th Heaven), Reggie Vel Johnson (Family Matters), the late great Dick Van Patten (Eight is Enough), Jon Cryer (Two and a Half Men), and my friend Bill Paxton (Big Love) who sadly would only see seven more Father’s Days. But the undisputed star of the evening was Dick Van Dyke who played a Dad on two hit series, The Dick Van Dyke Show and Diagnosis Murder, and who I introduced as being 84 years old. “I’m only 83,” he jokingly corrected me. Sixteen years later, he would publish his eighth book, 100 Rules for Living to 100, and this Saturday he will realize the milestone of which he wrote.

Dick was born Richard Wayne Van Dyke on Dec. 13, 1925, in West Plains, Mo. to Hazel, a stenographer, and Loren, who was a traveling salesman. While still in high school, Dick worked part-time at a radio station in Danville, Ill., then left before graduation to enlist in the Air Force. After the war, he formed a comedy team called the Merry Mutes, but struggled financially. He served a short stint as host of the CBS morning show in New York before working on the stage and eventually landing a starring role in Bye Bye Birdie, for which he won a Tony award. That landed him the same role in the film version as well as a string of successes on television beginning with The Dick Van Dyke Show, for which he won three Emmys. He would go on to win three more, the last of which came in 2023 at the age of 97. His role as Bert in 1964’s Mary Poppins made Dick an international film star and cemented his reputation as a bankable performer in all genres whose talents remained in constant demand throughout his life. What follows are highlights from my conversation with Dick during our TV dads event.

 


Jim: On The Dick Van Dyke Show, Rob and Laura slept in separate beds. Did they ever fool around?

Dick: Of course. It was implied. We had a kid didn’t we? [laughs]

Jim: How did you learn about the facts of life?

Dick: Well, I didn’t know what puberty was until I was almost past it. But I learned a lot about sex from the Sears and Roebuck catalog.

Jim: I thought that was a hardware magazine.

Dick: Not in those days. Actually, though my wife taught me most of what I know.

Jim: Dick I understand that your dad’s nickname was “Cookie” because he worked for the Sunshine Biscuit company.

Dick: How’d you know that?

Jim: ’Cause I did my homework. Tell me about him.

Dick: He was a traveling salesman, so he was only home on weekends. My association was mainly with my mother because Dad was very distant. But I grew up during the Depression, and times were really tough. We were constantly in debt and worried about money. I was 4 years old when the stock market crashed, and I lost everything [audience laughs]. But my dad’s saving grace was that he had a great sense of humor about his condition in life and about himself, and I can remember laughing until I had tears in my eyes. My mother was the same way, and they could both laugh about their poverty. My brother Jerry and I have often talked about it because we didn’t know we were poor. We had a wonderful childhood, I think much better than kids today, because we weren’t micromanaged. Our summer vacation was ours, and we did what we wanted to. Those were great days.

Jim: I read somewhere that your first acting role was when you were 4 years old, and you played the baby Jesus.

Dick: That’s right, and I got laughs [laughter].

Jim: What was your first paid acting job?

Dick: I loved magic as a child, and at age 12, I was doing Kiwanis Club luncheons and things like that for $3. So, I liked performing right from the beginning. In high school, I was in all the shows, and I never really thought it was a chance to be in show business; I just loved it so much, but I got all the breaks.

Jim: I heard that when filming the pilot for The Dick Van Dyke Show, you sweated through six dress shirts because you were uptight.

Dick: Yeah, but not only that. I was doing Bye Bye Birdie on Broadway, and they gave me a week off to film the pilot and I was so nervous, and it meant so much to me that I developed five fever blisters on my mouth, and I had to kiss Mary Tyler Moore like that [he cringes].

Jim: When you start any new project do you still get butterflies?

Dick: No, these days I just have a wonderful time. All the nerves stopped years ago because I did a lot of stuff that I had never done before. I auditioned for Bye Bye Birdie for Gower Champion when I couldn’t even sing and dance, so I got up and did a little soft-shoe, singing “Once in Love with Amy,” and they gave me the job. And I thought, “Oh great. Now I gotta learn how to sing and dance.” [laughs].



 

As we wrapped up our discussion, I asked each panelist to name their favorite TV dad, and Bryan Cranston spoke for everyone, saying, “When I first started to work on Malcolm in the Middle, I really didn’t know where my character was going, but I knew all I had to do is look to my hero Dick Van Dyke. I adore you. You know that. You have always been my idol and every stitch of comedy that I’ve ever attained has come from you [audience applauds and they shake hands]. I also owe you a lot of commission money, by the way.”

At the end of the event, I summoned co-stars and family members to come up on stage and say a few words about the TV dads, then I pressed Dick into service to perform with his quartet, Dick Van Dyke and the Vantastix. Not surprisingly, they garnered an enthusiastic standing ovation from the capacity crowd.

A few weeks ago, Dick graced the cover of PEOPLE magazine, proclaiming, “I’m having the time of my life!” I felt the same way, being able to work with Dick on that memorable summer evening 16 years ago. Happy 100th birthday to everyone’s favorite TV dad.

 
 


JFK and the First Thanksgiving

Posted November 25, 2025 By Triad Today
President John F. Kennedy

President Kennedy receiving a Thanksgiving turkey

President John F. Kennedy receives a turkey presented to him for Thanksgiving by the National Turkey Federation and the Poultry and Egg National Board.
Photo By Abbie Rowe, White House Photographs, John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, Boston


Presidents are only human, so they make mistakes. No, I’m not talking about Bill Clinton hooking up with Monica Lewinsky, or George H.W. Bush not knowing what a bar code was. I’m talking about John Kennedy, and how he misread history, unintentionally insulted the Commonwealth of Virginia, and was compelled to make amends.

The story begins on Wednesday December 4, 1619. That’s the day 38 English settlers from the London Company navigated their ship down the James River and onto Berkeley Hundred (Harrison’s Landing), in what is now Charles City, Virginia, just 20 miles upstream from Jamestown, which had been settled 12 years prior. The landing party was led by Captain John Woodlief, who, as prescribed in the company charter, ordered a day of Thanksgiving to be observed upon their arrival, and every December 4th thereafter.

Over time, Berkeley became known for its historic firsts. The first bourbon whiskey was made there in 1621 (by a preacher, no less). “Taps” was played for the first time while the Union army was encamped at Berkeley in 1862. And, of course, it was the site of America’s first Thanksgiving. More on that in a moment.

In 1907 Berkeley was purchased by John Jamieson, who had served as a Union drummer boy during the army’s encampment at the plantation. Ownership later fell to his son (and my friend) Malcolm, who passed away in 1997. Mac loved Berkeley and was aggressive in marketing the historic site, including through the use of promotional videos and commercials which I helped to produce. He invited the public to tour the house and grounds, sold Berkeley boxwoods and bourbon, and held an annual Thanksgiving pageant which attracted tourists from across the country. But the celebration wasn’t always widely recognized.

One hundred years after his father beat the Yankee drums at Berkeley, Mac was upset by something another Yankee did. In the fall of 1962, President Kennedy issued his yearly Thanksgiving Proclamation in which he recognized his home state of Massachusetts as the site of America’s first Thanksgiving. And so, on November 9th of that year, Virginia state Senator John Wicker was prompted by Mac to write to the President, and point out Kennedy’s faux pas. In his telegram, Wicker referenced historical records about Berkeley’s celebration, which took place one full year before the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth in 1620.

Later that year, Kennedy’s confidant, and noted historian, Arthur Schlesinger sent a reply to Wicker with a tongue-in-cheek apology from the President. According to Berkeley records, Schlesinger “attributed the error to unconquerable New England bias on the part of the White House staff.”

The following year, on November 5, 1963, President Kennedy had to eat crow during his annual Thanksgiving proclamation, saying, “Over three centuries ago, our forefathers in Virginia and Massachusetts, far from home, in a lonely wilderness, set aside a day of thanksgiving.” Kennedy’s New England bias wouldn’t allow him to disavow Plymouth entirely, but Mac was happy that Berkeley finally gained official recognition for holding the first Thanksgiving, even if it was a shared honor. Sadly, it was to be Kennedy’s last proclamation. He was assassinated seventeen days later in Dallas.

The holiday season is now upon us, and that means gathering together with friends and family to share food, gifts, and goodwill. And, despite the personal and financial losses we might have endured over the past year, we will find a way to give thanks for what we have and who we’re with. Perhaps we would also do well to emulate those weary English settlers, and just be thankful for surviving another day of our long journey. So, here’s a Berkeley bourbon toast to Captain Woodlief, a little drummer boy, old Mac, and to that Yankee president who finally set the record straight.

May God bless, and happy Thanksgiving.
 
 


The Threat of Artificial Actors

Posted November 11, 2025 By Triad Today
pixelated image of an AI-generated actor called Tilly Norwood

pixelated image of an AI-generated actor called Tilly Norwood
Hollywood built its reputation on fantasy. Studio bosses, make-up artists, and publicity departments spent tons of money and countless hours making us believe that what we saw on screen was real. We didn’t know that Clark Gable had false teeth, that Bogey wore a toupee, that Rock Hudson was gay, or that Lassie wasn’t a female. But now the tables are starting to turn. Soon, instead of issuing fake news about real actors, publicists will issue real news about fake ones. When that happens, you can blame it all on Tilly Norwood.

Tilly is an artificially generated woman created by Eline van der Velden, who is a producer for Particle6 and its UK-based  Xicoia studios. Tilly, who Xicoia describes as a digital human, had her coming out at the Zurich Film Festival earlier this year, appearing in photos and videos. The AI actress is an amalgamation of countless images and voices, and is a strikingly beautiful young woman with a (sometimes) slight British accent.

Her debut comes on the heels of a campaign by talent unions to fight against unauthorized use of human actors’ voices and likeness. But since Tilly doesn’t look or sound like any one particular actress, then van der Velden and Xicoia can’t be sued, much less stopped from selling Ms. Norwood’s services to film and television companies. Upon seeing Tilly, award-winning actress Emily Blunt told Yahoo Entertainment, “Good Lord, we’re screwed. This is really, really scary.”   

SAG-AFTRA agrees. In a statement issued last month, the organization said, “Our union is opposed to the replacement of human performers by synthetics. [Tilly] has no life experience to draw from, no emotion and, from what we’ve seen, audiences aren’t interested in watching computer-generated content untethered from the human experience…it puts actors out of work, jeopardizing performer livelihoods and devaluing human artistry.”

Hey SAG-AFTRA, you’re exactly 100 years too late to be complaining about artificially generated content. In the 1925 silent film The Lost World (as well as in its 1961 remake), actors appeared alongside stop-motion dinosaurs. By 1973, Westworld became the first film to use CGI with live action. In 1982, Tron featured CGI-created live characters and objects, and in 2009, Avatar was absent of any live actors altogether. Human actors might have complained along the way; nevertheless, they agreed to appear on screen with artificial characters and objects because they were paid well to do so.

There are, of course, advantages to studios for using AI-generated performers like Tilly. For one thing, she will work for less pay than human actors and, as Eline van der Velden said, “She will be endlessly adaptable, always available, and immune to scandal.” It is just a matter of time before Xicoia creates a male version of Tilly, and then you’ll probably hear objections from the likes of Daniel Day Lewis and Tom Cruise. But even then, it is the female artists who will feel most cheated by the AI storm because they were finally making some progress in the equal pay department. Actresses are also better protected now from sexual harassment than ever before, freeing them up to concentrate on the work instead of lodging complaints with HR. But all that progress could be moot if Tilly Norwoods start getting all of the jobs.

For now, though, established stars don’t have much to worry about because audiences aren’t going to prefer Tilly Norwood over Sydney Sweeney. However, in due time, AI-generated performers could be on the same footing with young, up-and-coming actresses, and that’s when the job market for human performers could dry up quickly. Call me old-fashioned, but I prefer my film fantasies to be created by real people who act fake instead of the other way around.