
Throughout the 2016 presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton enjoyed a solid lead in the polls over political newcomer Donald Trump. And why not? Clinton was thought to have been the most qualified presidential candidate in history, having served as First Lady, United States Senator, and Secretary of State. She was also very smart, savvy, and ruthless, having allegedly manipulated superdelegates, the DNC, and the primary rules in order to disenfranchise Bernie Sanders’ voters.
Meanwhile, Trump had dispatched the GOP primary field with ease, despite the fact that he had no credentials, no sense of decorum, and was functionally illiterate. Still, pundits all agreed that Trump stood no chance of beating Clinton. But Hillary had two things working against her. First, she was not personable, and second, she was arrogant to a fault. The latter trait would be her undoing. Coming down the stretch, Bill Clinton, a successful and still admired two-term president, advised his wife to focus on the Rust Belt states, and to make as many trips to that region as possible. According to numerous insider reports, Hillary angrily dismissed Bill’s advice. On election night she wished she had listened to him. Though she garnered more votes than Trump, Donald beat her in the Rust Belt, and it was enough to prevail in the Electoral College.
By 2020, Americans of all stripes had grown tired of Trump’s bullying ways and his mishandling of the COVID pandemic, so they voted Joe Biden into office. Democrats were hopeful that the Biden/Harris victory would launch an era of political dominance for the blue team, but it wasn’t to be. Uncle Joe’s age caught up with him, so much so, that staff limited his interaction with the press. But they couldn’t keep him totally out of the public eye, and on those occasions, his speech became increasingly jumbled, and at times he didn’t seem to know where he was. Meanwhile, Biden managed to let over 2 million illegal immigrants cross our borders in less than four years, and food prices were continuing to rise.
When Democratic leadership finally forced Joe from the 2024 race it did so without a cohesive plan for naming his successor. And when Harris was anointed without so much as a mini-primary, the party opened the door for Trump to become the first president since Grover Cleveland to win two non-consecutive terms. During her abbreviated campaign, Harris avoided tough interviews because she was widely known for her word salad answers. To make matters worse, she couldn’t defend her failed immigration policy (Biden had put her in charge of the border crisis) and even said there was nothing she would have changed about Biden’s policies. Unfortunately, her gender and skin color also worked against her due to an increasing number of voters who were misogynistic and racist. But perhaps those hurdles could have been mitigated had it not been for Kamala taking her eye off the ball. Just as Hillary had ignored Middle America in 2016, Kamala refused to move her politics to the center and listen to what Middle America was trying to tell her. Americans didn’t want illegals streaming across our borders. They didn’t like having to choose between food and rent. And they also had grown tired of Democratic wokeness. Americans were tired of having politically correct pronouns forced on them, and tired of having biological men invade women’s sports. Biden never got that message, and Harris didn’t know how to adapt to it. Thus, Republicans easily won the White House, Congress, and the Senate, all in one night.
The question is, have Democrats learned their lesson? The answer is no, and I’ll cite one policy issue as an example. After Trump declared that there are only two genders, all Democratic politicians should have followed California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s lead when he came out against young men playing women’s sports. After all, girls and women have been seriously injured when competing against biological males, and Democratic elected officials need to understand that.
Instead, most of them have continued to double down on their out-of-touch wokeness. Earlier this month when a Senate bill was proposed that would have officially banned trans athletes from competing in girls’ and women’s sports, not a single Democrat supported it. And then there was the testy exchange during a recent White House summit in which Maine’s Democratic Governor Janet Mills told Trump that she would not obey any presidential order that barred biological males from participating in women’s sports. But perhaps the most telling incident of how Democrats haven’t learned their lesson occurred last week during a congressional hearing. GOP committee Chairman Keith Self introduced Sarah McBride, a trans representative from Delaware, as “Mr. McBride.” McBride then snarked, “Thank you Madam Chairman.” That’s when Democrat Congressman Bill Keating angrily scolded Mr. Self and refused to let the hearing proceed until the Chairman introduced McBride in a politically correct manner. Channeling the McCarthy hearings of the 1950s, drama queen Keating said, “Mr. Chairman have you no decency?” Rep. Self then adjourned the hearing, and the people’s business was put on hold, while yet another Democrat had a temper tantrum designed to shame middle Americans for not embracing multiple genders.
It’s no wonder that a recent CNN poll shows the Democratic Party’s favorability rating is at an all-time low. Truth is, average Americans of all faiths, genders, and races just want to feel like our elected leaders are “woke” to our everyday concerns, and if they can’t manage to do that, then it will be a cold day in Hell before Democrats take back the White House.





























Posted April 1, 2025 By Triad TodayMuch Ado About Sex
If there was a competition for who gets the most media exposure it would be a tight race between Donald Trump and Blake Lively. Both are well known. Both are engaged in lawsuits. Both demand to be the center of attention. Both have been in high-profile relationships, and both create chaos in their respective workplaces. The only thing that sets them apart is that only one of them insists on having an intimacy coordinator during sex.
The truth is that you can’t pick up a newspaper or magazine, or search online for news without having to first navigate around the latest story about Blake Lively. That’s because she has become the latest poster girl for the Me Too movement in its fight against sexual harassment. Don’t get me wrong. Women have been and continue to be harassed by misogynist males who think it’s OK to make lewd comments to female co-workers, or touch them inappropriately. It’s even worse when that behavior is generated by male bosses. But lately, we have been bombarded by news of alleged harassment in Hollywood, particularly when a film or television production involves scenes of intimacy.
In Lively’s case, she claims that co-star/producer Justin Baldoni acted verbally and physically inappropriately during the filming of It Ends With Us. I won’t get into the specific, he said/she said elements of this particular case, except to say that over the past few years, film studios have increasingly assigned intimacy coordinators to be on set as a guardrail against unwanted actions that might otherwise be construed as sexual harassment. In fact, the intimacy coordinator profession has grown into such a cottage industry that there’s even an organization to represent it. Intimacy Directors International was established in 2016 to define the responsibilities of intimacy coordinators, including being on set to ensure that actors “continually consent to all scenes of intimacy.”
These coordinators are welcomed by some actresses and scoffed at by others, especially old-school performers like Gwyneth Paltrow who recently told Vanity Fair that she feels stifled by using an intimacy coordinator. While filming a number of sex scenes with Timothy Chalamet for the upcoming Marty Supreme, Paltrow was asked by the intimacy coordinator if she felt comfortable with a particular sexual position. Paltrow’s response was, “Girl, I’m from the era where you get naked, you get in bed, and the camera is rolling.” Another Hollywood veteran, Kim Basinger also told Variety that intimacy coordinators are unnecessary. “Either we work it out or we don’t. I don’t see the need for supervised visits,” said Basinger.
Granted things can get out of hand when an actor and actress are heating up the sheets during a racy scene, so much so that Nicole Kidman had to take a break from filming Babygirl. Meanwhile, other performers have allegedly just let nature take its course during filming, such as Donald Sutherland and Julie Christie in Don’t Look Now, and Michelle Borth in HBO’s Tell Me You Love Me. On the opposite end of the spectrum, there are actors who refuse roles just to avoid intimacy of any kind. Such is the case with Yellowstone villain Neal McDonough who says acting in sex scenes goes against his marriage vows, and Pat Boone who once declined to even kiss Shirley Jones in April Love without first getting permission from his wife.
I suppose the public will always be interested in what goes on behind the scenes in Hollywood, so it’s no wonder that the internet is inundated with the latest juicy gossip about all things sexual. I just wish there was less vitriol and more funny anecdotes to read about, like what happened during the 1974 filming of The Towering Inferno. As it so happens Faye Dunaway was nervous about her upcoming sex scene with Paul Newman, so in order to break the ice and put everyone at ease, just before Dunaway got into bed, Newman threw back the sheets to reveal that he was wearing cowboy boots and spurs. The prank broke everyone up, the tension was eased, and there was no need for either an intimacy coordinator or a bunch of attorneys to file lawsuits for harassment. Where’s Paul Newman when you need him.