Commentaries Archive


JFK and the First Thanksgiving

Posted November 25, 2025 By Triad Today
President John F. Kennedy

President Kennedy receiving a Thanksgiving turkey

President John F. Kennedy receives a turkey presented to him for Thanksgiving by the National Turkey Federation and the Poultry and Egg National Board.
Photo By Abbie Rowe, White House Photographs, John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, Boston


Presidents are only human, so they make mistakes. No, I’m not talking about Bill Clinton hooking up with Monica Lewinsky, or George H.W. Bush not knowing what a bar code was. I’m talking about John Kennedy, and how he misread history, unintentionally insulted the Commonwealth of Virginia, and was compelled to make amends.

The story begins on Wednesday December 4, 1619. That’s the day 38 English settlers from the London Company navigated their ship down the James River and onto Berkeley Hundred (Harrison’s Landing), in what is now Charles City, Virginia, just 20 miles upstream from Jamestown, which had been settled 12 years prior. The landing party was led by Captain John Woodlief, who, as prescribed in the company charter, ordered a day of Thanksgiving to be observed upon their arrival, and every December 4th thereafter.

Over time, Berkeley became known for its historic firsts. The first bourbon whiskey was made there in 1621 (by a preacher, no less). “Taps” was played for the first time while the Union army was encamped at Berkeley in 1862. And, of course, it was the site of America’s first Thanksgiving. More on that in a moment.

In 1907 Berkeley was purchased by John Jamieson, who had served as a Union drummer boy during the army’s encampment at the plantation. Ownership later fell to his son (and my friend) Malcolm, who passed away in 1997. Mac loved Berkeley and was aggressive in marketing the historic site, including through the use of promotional videos and commercials which I helped to produce. He invited the public to tour the house and grounds, sold Berkeley boxwoods and bourbon, and held an annual Thanksgiving pageant which attracted tourists from across the country. But the celebration wasn’t always widely recognized.

One hundred years after his father beat the Yankee drums at Berkeley, Mac was upset by something another Yankee did. In the fall of 1962, President Kennedy issued his yearly Thanksgiving Proclamation in which he recognized his home state of Massachusetts as the site of America’s first Thanksgiving. And so, on November 9th of that year, Virginia state Senator John Wicker was prompted by Mac to write to the President, and point out Kennedy’s faux pas. In his telegram, Wicker referenced historical records about Berkeley’s celebration, which took place one full year before the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth in 1620.

Later that year, Kennedy’s confidant, and noted historian, Arthur Schlesinger sent a reply to Wicker with a tongue-in-cheek apology from the President. According to Berkeley records, Schlesinger “attributed the error to unconquerable New England bias on the part of the White House staff.”

The following year, on November 5, 1963, President Kennedy had to eat crow during his annual Thanksgiving proclamation, saying, “Over three centuries ago, our forefathers in Virginia and Massachusetts, far from home, in a lonely wilderness, set aside a day of thanksgiving.” Kennedy’s New England bias wouldn’t allow him to disavow Plymouth entirely, but Mac was happy that Berkeley finally gained official recognition for holding the first Thanksgiving, even if it was a shared honor. Sadly, it was to be Kennedy’s last proclamation. He was assassinated seventeen days later in Dallas.

The holiday season is now upon us, and that means gathering together with friends and family to share food, gifts, and goodwill. And, despite the personal and financial losses we might have endured over the past year, we will find a way to give thanks for what we have and who we’re with. Perhaps we would also do well to emulate those weary English settlers, and just be thankful for surviving another day of our long journey. So, here’s a Berkeley bourbon toast to Captain Woodlief, a little drummer boy, old Mac, and to that Yankee president who finally set the record straight.

May God bless, and happy Thanksgiving.
 
 


The Threat of Artificial Actors

Posted November 11, 2025 By Triad Today
pixelated image of an AI-generated actor called Tilly Norwood

pixelated image of an AI-generated actor called Tilly Norwood
Hollywood built its reputation on fantasy. Studio bosses, make-up artists, and publicity departments spent tons of money and countless hours making us believe that what we saw on screen was real. We didn’t know that Clark Gable had false teeth, that Bogey wore a toupee, that Rock Hudson was gay, or that Lassie wasn’t a female. But now the tables are starting to turn. Soon, instead of issuing fake news about real actors, publicists will issue real news about fake ones. When that happens, you can blame it all on Tilly Norwood.

Tilly is an artificially generated woman created by Eline van der Velden, who is a producer for Particle6 and its UK-based  Xicoia studios. Tilly, who Xicoia describes as a digital human, had her coming out at the Zurich Film Festival earlier this year, appearing in photos and videos. The AI actress is an amalgamation of countless images and voices, and is a strikingly beautiful young woman with a (sometimes) slight British accent.

Her debut comes on the heels of a campaign by talent unions to fight against unauthorized use of human actors’ voices and likeness. But since Tilly doesn’t look or sound like any one particular actress, then van der Velden and Xicoia can’t be sued, much less stopped from selling Ms. Norwood’s services to film and television companies. Upon seeing Tilly, award-winning actress Emily Blunt told Yahoo Entertainment, “Good Lord, we’re screwed. This is really, really scary.”   

SAG-AFTRA agrees. In a statement issued last month, the organization said, “Our union is opposed to the replacement of human performers by synthetics. [Tilly] has no life experience to draw from, no emotion and, from what we’ve seen, audiences aren’t interested in watching computer-generated content untethered from the human experience…it puts actors out of work, jeopardizing performer livelihoods and devaluing human artistry.”

Hey SAG-AFTRA, you’re exactly 100 years too late to be complaining about artificially generated content. In the 1925 silent film The Lost World (as well as in its 1961 remake), actors appeared alongside stop-motion dinosaurs. By 1973, Westworld became the first film to use CGI with live action. In 1982, Tron featured CGI-created live characters and objects, and in 2009, Avatar was absent of any live actors altogether. Human actors might have complained along the way; nevertheless, they agreed to appear on screen with artificial characters and objects because they were paid well to do so.

There are, of course, advantages to studios for using AI-generated performers like Tilly. For one thing, she will work for less pay than human actors and, as Eline van der Velden said, “She will be endlessly adaptable, always available, and immune to scandal.” It is just a matter of time before Xicoia creates a male version of Tilly, and then you’ll probably hear objections from the likes of Daniel Day Lewis and Tom Cruise. But even then, it is the female artists who will feel most cheated by the AI storm because they were finally making some progress in the equal pay department. Actresses are also better protected now from sexual harassment than ever before, freeing them up to concentrate on the work instead of lodging complaints with HR. But all that progress could be moot if Tilly Norwoods start getting all of the jobs.

For now, though, established stars don’t have much to worry about because audiences aren’t going to prefer Tilly Norwood over Sydney Sweeney. However, in due time, AI-generated performers could be on the same footing with young, up-and-coming actresses, and that’s when the job market for human performers could dry up quickly. Call me old-fashioned, but I prefer my film fantasies to be created by real people who act fake instead of the other way around.

 
 


National Guard in the Triad?

Posted October 28, 2025 By Triad Today
A National Guardsman stands in front of the US Capitol

National Guard in the streets of Winston-Salem in 1967
There has been much debate lately about when and how federal troops should be deployed to restore order in cities with high crime rates or where violence is out of control. That’s because National Guard units showed up in Washington, D.C. earlier this year, and the administration is looking to do the same in Portland, Chicago, and other cities. That begs the question: Can we envision a time and circumstance when National Guard troops would ever be sent into the Triad? The answer is “yes,” and in fact it has already happened once before. Here’s the background.

On Oct. 15, 1967, James Eller, an African American father of four, was seen staggering across a street. Mr. Eller made it to the front porch of his house, where several police officers caught up with him and proceeded to arrest him for alleged public drunkenness. According to police, Eller resisted arrest, and the officers tried to subdue him, first by spraying MACE into his eyes. That didn’t work, so Patrolman W.E. Owens struck Eller on the head with a blackjack. It proved to be a fatal blow. Police didn’t release details of Eller’s death until eight days later, and it was another four days after that before Owens was suspended. Eller’s widow swore out a warrant against Owens, which, according to the Winston-Salem Journal, stated that Owens, “feloniously, with premeditation, deliberation, and malice a fore thought, did kill and murder one James Eller.” Judge Leroy Sams dismissed the case, and that ruling triggered riots in downtown Winston-Salem.

Winston-Salem Journal and Twin City Sentinel reporters provided extensive coverage of the riots, which included descriptions of damage to stores along Liberty, North Trade, North Cherry, Claremont, Main, and Fourth Streets. Most of the businesses were looted, then burned. Mobs particularly targeted jewelry and liquor stores, as well as furniture and appliance stores. Fires broke out everywhere, cars were overturned, bricks were tossed, and shots were fired.

Patrolman E.W. Thorpe described the Nov. 2 sniper fire to reporter Eugene White, saying, “Guns were reporting everywhere, and you didn’t know who was shooting at who.” Thorpe’s own patrol car was struck by sniper fire at 13th and Patterson Avenues. His partner, C.E. Crosby, who fought in the Pacific during WWII, described the rioting as a “small scale war.” Said Crosby, “We didn’t know where to take cover when there was shooting. We were afraid we might try to take cover where the shooting was coming from.”

Mobs also set a fire just behind a Reynolds Tobacco factory on Chestnut Street. The fire was burning near a gas tank, and had Thorpe and Crosby not arrived in time to put it out, there probably would be no Innovation Quarter today.

Twin City police chief Cornelius Tucker told his troops to “take things easy on the mob,” but he added, “Pull out the heavy stuff. Don’t use it unless you have to, but display it. But STOP it.” Normally, local National Guardsmen are not called upon to defend their own city, but the 200-man Winston-Salem guard was put on alert.  Meanwhile, Mayor M.C. Benton and Governor Dan Moore deployed National Guardsmen from Mount Airy. Most of them patrolled the streets, while others were given rooftop duty. Two of them, Spec 4 Tommy Hennis and PFC Rodney Cooke, were positioned atop the Robert E. Lee Hotel.

I was 13 years old at the time, and I vividly remember riding to church and seeing armed National Guardsmen positioned on tops of buildings throughout downtown Winston-Salem.

After a couple of days, all that remained of the “small scale war” were charred buildings and debris in the streets. Order had been restored without loss of life.

The events of Oct. 15 and Nov. 2, 1967, taught us a lot about race relations, the criminal justice system, mobs, and the way Winston-Salem dealt with all of them. Officer Owens probably didn’t mean to kill Mr. Eller, but his unnecessary use of force triggered a firestorm nevertheless. Critics of the time said the officers on Eller’s front porch that fateful day should have used handcuffs instead of MACE and nightsticks. The police chief should have gone public within hours of Eller’s death. Judge Sams should have meted out an appropriate punishment for Officer Owens. And the rioters should have stayed home because burning and looting is never an appropriate or effective response to police brutality.

The Winston-Salem police did an admirable job during the riots of 1967, but they couldn’t have restored order without help from the National Guard, proving that there are times when a military presence is absolutely necessary.

Of course, such deployment should always be at the behest of the governor, and in this case, his decision proved to be justified. That was nearly 60 years ago, but we must be ever vigilant when it comes to dealing with the things that often divide us. As then Winston-Salem Journal editor Wallace Carroll wrote, “No city in America is immune from the passions of these days.”

 
 


Making Healthcare Better for All

Posted October 14, 2025 By Triad Today
Cheryl Parquet of Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina

Cheryl Parquet of Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina
Too often, we forget that large corporations are composed of individuals who work day-in and day-out to serve their customers and their community. That’s how it is with Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina and people like Cheryl Parquet. Cheryl, who hails from and still lives in Mebane, is the company’s associate vice president for community engagement. She graduated from UNC Chapel Hill and holds a Certified Diversity and Inclusion Professional Credential from Cornell University. She has over 16 years of experience in community relations, marketing activation, and diversity engagement in the health insurance industry, and was named one of the top 50 women leaders in North Carolina. Cheryl was a recent guest on my Triad Today television show, and what I learned is that she is truly committed to making healthcare better for all. What follows are highlights from our conversation.

 


Jim: Blue Cross provides healthcare for nearly 4 million North Carolina residents, so what’s your approach to addressing local health challenges?

Cheryl: About two years ago, we took our executives out to visit all 100 counties. We met with community partners, leaders, legislators, and our members, and we had conversations about the challenges that people in our state are facing. And through those conversations, we’ve taken an intentional approach to how we’re changing our products and services, and how we meet the most challenging needs in our community, such as focusing on youth mental health, improving access to healthcare, and promoting health through food.

Jim: Tell me about the Blue Cross mission here in North Carolina.

Cheryl: Our mission is to improve the health and well-being of our customers and communities. It’s a part of our DNA. Our customers are our neighbors. We live, work, and play with them, so we show up each and every day for them. 

Jim: Who or what led you to a career in healthcare?

Cheryl: It was because of my personal experience growing up. I understand about nonprofits because they were there to support me and my family when we needed it. I have an understanding of what the food bank means to so many families. I understand what it means to go to a free clinic and receive services there and how important these safety net organizations are for our community.

Jim: So, what’s most gratifying to you about the work you do for Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina through community engagement?

Cheryl: What’s gratifying to me is to be able to meet with so many different people across our state, to understand their needs, and then to be able to go back and have conversations with our community partners and say, “How can we support you to do the work?” At the end of the day, our investments of time and money are there to support our customers and also our community partners, who are the ones on the ground doing the work each and every day.



 

For more information, visit BlueCrossNC.com.

 
 


Remembering John Masius: A Principled Scribe

Posted October 7, 2025 By Triad Today
Television screenwriter John Masius

Television screenwriter John Masius
In St. Elsewhere, a doctor’s wife is killed in an accident, and he is left to raise his autistic son, who seldom speaks. In Dolphin’s Cove, a man’s wife dies, and his daughter is so traumatized that she cannot speak. In the original pilot for Touched by an Angel, the lead character has died in an accident and becomes an angel whose first assignment is to care for an autistic girl who won’t speak. In Dead Like Me, the Grim Reaper takes up residence in Seattle. In Providence, a plastic surgeon’s dead mother appears in every episode, and in the premier episode of HawthoRNe, a divorced nurse tries to prevent a stage four cancer patient from committing suicide. 

Over a period of about 40 years, these compelling stories about dealing with death and disability came from the heart and heartbreak of the same man, my friend John Masius, one of Hollywood’s most talented and decorated storytellers. John died on Sept. 13 at the age of 75 following a year-long battle with ALS. He is survived by a remarkable body of work, a remarkable ex-wife, and three remarkable children.

Born in the suburbs of New York City, John displayed a talent for writing early on, yet never enjoyed the process, telling me, “Writing’s very difficult for me. It’s very hard. I don’t jump at the prospect of doing it, like homework. For me, it’s like having an exam paper due.” John attended Penn, then moved west and graduated from UCLA with, of all things, an M.B.A. He waited tables at an L.A. restaurant to make ends meet, where one day he happened to serve Bruce Paltrow, then the producer of The White Shadow for MTM and CBS. Paltrow hired John to be a gopher, and years later promoted him to writer/producer on Shadow and St. Elsewhere.

I first got to know John (“Maysh” to his friends) when I was writing a series of articles about St. Elsewhere, and then when I interviewed him for the first volume of my “TV Creators” series of books. He also appeared on a panel that I moderated in 2000 on “Women in Drama” for the Television Academy, which featured the actresses and creators of several new primetime series headlined by women. I particularly wanted John to participate because it was his groundbreaking show Providence which launched a new era of TV dramas for the 21st century, starring women in the lead role.

Maysh was a complex man of strong principles who didn’t suffer fools well, but sometimes his principles put him at odds with those in power. That’s what happened with Touched by an Angel. John and his wife, Ellen Bry (an actress and ensemble star in St. Elsewhere), had three children—a daughter and two sons, both of whom were diagnosed with autism. While interviewing him for my book, Maysh told me, “At that time I was pretty angry at God, and I still don’t really understand what kind of God does terrible things to small kids. The other thing I couldn’t handle was people, in their urge to comfort us, would say, ‘God doesn’t give you more than you can handle,’ which Ellen and I found incredibly disturbing.” 

Ellen’s and John’s struggle to cope was an impetus for Touched by an Angel, where in the pilot episode, angel Monica (Roma Downey), who had died in the 1920’s was now comforting her terminally ill, 80-year-old “daughter” who she had saved seven decades earlier. Monica pleads with the Angel of Death to end her daughter’s suffering, but he refuses, saying, “God doesn’t give you more than you can handle,” to which Monica replies, “That’s a lot of crap.” Executives at CBS felt that Monica’s retort was too dark and told John to remove that line of dialogue. Maysh refused, his pilot never aired, and he was fired from the series.

Several years later John resurrected his career when he created Providence for NBC, followed by HawthoRNe for TNT, both of which were well received by audiences and critics alike. And though Maysh told me, “critically acclaimed doesn’t pay the mortgage,” he was, nevertheless, richly rewarded by his peers and admirers, picking up numerous honors including two Emmys, a Peabody, the Humanitas Prize, a Writers Guild award, and several People’s Choice awards.  

Over the years Maysh and I kept in touch by email and phone, but the last time I saw him in person was on the set of HawthoRNe, where he greeted my wife Pam and me warmly and with his trademark impish smile. As I think of that day, I recall his response to a question I had asked him during our conversations for “TV Creators.”

Jim: Suppose there was no such thing as on-screen credits for TV shows. How would someone know they had just watched a John Masius show?

John: They’d get some laughs and probably be moved. They’d also be twisted up a little bit emotionally. They’d be manipulated because I would have fu#ked with their heads. [laughs]

Rest in peace, my perverse and principled friend.

 
 


What’s Up With Youth Sports?

Posted September 30, 2025 By Triad Today

Having a long-time interest in ACC sports, I recall vividly watching the 1978 Gator Bowl in which the Clemson Tigers faced Big Ten powerhouse Ohio State, coached by the legendary Woody Hayes. With about two minutes remaining in the game, OSU was poised to score and take the lead when the Buckeye quarterback threw an interception. The recipient of that errant throw was Clemson’s Charlie Bauman, who eluded a number of tackles before getting knocked down out of bounds along the OSU sideline. As Bauman got to his feet, Hayes punched him in the throat and continued the beating until he was pulled away. Hayes was later fired for the incident. Well, that was then, and this is now. Back then players, coaches, and fans did lots of macho stuff like fighting and spitting, but thank goodness we’re more civilized today. NOT! If anything, incidents of bad behavior at all levels of youth sports are far worse and far more frequent than ever before.

Last month, 38-year-old Daniel Fazio, coach of a youth football team in Connecticut, shoved an opposing player to the ground. The player was all of 7 years old.

That same week, federal civil rights charges were filed against the football coach at Ursuline High School in Youngstown, Ohio. He was charged with allowing hazing and assault of his own players during a football camping trip, then covering it up. As it turns out, that same coach was also accused of abusive behavior at his previous coaching job, including threatening to burn down the home of one of his players.

Also, last month, a Rhode Island High School coach was sentenced to probation for having his players strip naked so he could perform a hands-on inspection for body fat. Although that perverse behavior didn’t result in any physical harm to the players, it was abuse, nonetheless.

None of this comes as a surprise to researchers at UNCG and Stanford, who earlier this year released the results of a joint study on the health and wellness of college-age athletes. They concluded that one in five coaches are abusive to the kids in their charge. For mathematically challenged individuals such as myself, that means 20% of coaches inflict physical or emotional damage on their players.

OK, so much for coaches, now let’s turn to parents and fans. In October of 2023, the coach of a youth football team in St. Louis was shot four times by a parent who was angry that his son wasn’t getting enough playing time. USA Today’s Stephen Borelli reported a number of similar incidents that same year in Florida, Indiana, Mississippi, and California.

In February of this year, a Seattle dad was arrested for shoving two ice hockey referees to the ground for calls they made against his son. The man was 38 years old, and the volunteer refs he assaulted were 12 and 14 years old.

Increasingly, volunteers who officiate youth games are frequent targets of parental violence, so much so that there is now a nationwide shortage of men and women who want to referee youth sports. This is backed up by a report from the National Association of Sports Officials, in which 50% of all referees and umpires feel unsafe while doing their job.

And that brings me to the players themselves.

Last week, North Carolina A&T football coach Shawn Gibbs dropped one of his players from the team for squirting water at the opposing coach in a game against N.C. Central. Gibbs referred to the incident as an “issue with team culture.”

Team culture is also a problem at Smith High School, where two recent games had to be called off early due to violence.

Back in August, while competing against Northwest Cabarrus in the Mount Tabor football jamboree, Smith players got into two separate fights along the Northwest sideline. Then, last month, in a game against High Point Andrews, a Smith player punched a referee in the head. Following that incident, Que Tucker, commissioner of the N.C. High School Athletic Association, issued a press release saying, “A concerning rise in ejections related to unsportsmanlike behavior this year undermines the values of education-based athletics.”

I agree with Tucker’s rather obvious conclusion, but I doubt that isolated and individual suspensions of players and coaches are going to change the current culture of violence in youth sports. Certainly, fans and parents who assault players, coaches, and referees can be dealt with by the courts, but I fear that the only way to break the cycle of on-field violence is to severely penalize entire programs. In the case of Smith High School, it might be time to suspend the remainder of their football season altogether.

In explaining the rise in bad behavior among players, coaches, and fans involved with youth sports, Todd Nelson, a member of the N.Y. State Public High School Athletic Association, told USA Today, “We’ve lost some decorum in our society.” Nelson is correct, and we have social media and vitriolic elected officials to blame. Ten years ago, you never would have seen a grown woman take a home run ball away from a child. You also didn’t used to see as much road rage, and political debates used to be more civil. Folks today seem to be more empowered to feel more entitled, and that’s just not a good formula for how we should treat one another.

The one thing all sports have in common is that participants must follow a specific set of rules. Too often, though, the one rule they forget to follow is the golden one.

 
 


The Ironic Life and Death of Charlie Kirk

Posted September 23, 2025 By Triad Today

Charlie Kirk’s life was replete with irony. He was a college dropout who became the intellectual leader for a generation of college kids. He was a Biblical scholar who was also an activist in the secular world of politics. He didn’t originally seek the spotlight, yet became a popular host of radio, TikTok, and podcasting. He is also credited with handing the White House over to the Republican Party in last year’s election by delivering the coveted 18 to 29-year-old voting block. Yet earlier this month, he was murdered by a member of that same demographic group.

While speaking to a large crowd of college kids at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10, Kirk was shot in the neck and killed by 22-year-old Tyler Robinson. We may never know the full extent of why Robinson hated Kirk enough to murder him. Liberals say Tyler was radicalized by the right, and conservatives say he was radicalized by the left. Some in both camps say he was radicalized by a romantic involvement with his trans male roommate. All we know for sure is that Charlie Kirk’s voice was silenced that day by a disturbed young man who left our nation more politically divided than ever before, with people on both sides more willing to cancel each other out than to talk things out.

Charlie Kirk welcomed diversity of thought and invited civil discourse and debate everywhere he appeared throughout his tour of college campuses. To be sure, Kirk’s views were controversial. He was an election denier, he opposed DEI, he said that abortion was worse than the Holocaust, and he was anti-transgender. But above all, he was a staunch advocate for everyone’s right to free expression, and in that regard, I believe that Charlie would be sorely disappointed in what has transpired since his death.

In the days following Kirk’s assassination, journalists, broadcasters, public relations specialists, teachers, military personnel and others have been fired or disciplined for making public statements that were critical of Charlie.

Among those who found themselves out of a job were: MSNBC’s Matthew Dowd, who commented that “Hateful words lead to hateful actions,” implying that Kirk’s controversial views brought about his murder.

Charlie Rock, a PR coordinator for the Carolina Panthers, was canned for joking about Kirk’s 2023 statement in which Charlie had said “It’s worth…some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our God-given rights.” Rock used that quote to imply that Kirk’s assassination was justified.

Lisa Greenlee, a part-time instructor at Guilford Technical Community College, was fired after she told her students, “I’ll praise the shooter [Robinson]. He had good aim.” And last week, Randolph County high school teacher Heidi Varner resigned after she posted disparaging remarks about Kirk on social media.

Meanwhile, David Bauder of the Associated Press reported that a Florida journalist was suspended for the phrasing of a text he sent to his Congressman. And a Marine Corps recruiter was fired for posting: “Another racist man popped.”

A Washington Post columnist believes she was fired over posts she made about Kirk and America’s apathy toward guns, while over at ABC, Jimmy Kimmel’s TV show was suspended after he criticized Trump for not properly grieving his slain friend.

And last week, Attorney General Pam Bondi said that DOJ will start targeting left-wing protestors, while J.D. Vance called on everyone to report anyone who posts something negative about his friend Charlie Kirk.

Let me be clear. I am in no way defending the tasteless remarks that some folks have made in the days following Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Truth is, I would have probably fired some of them too, but it was Charlie’s firm belief that no one’s speech should be abridged. Beyond that, Kirk took criticism calmly and in stride. He also had a great sense of humor and never took himself too seriously. In fact, prior to his death, Charlie posted a video to say how much he enjoyed an episode of South Park which featured him as a “master debater” (a double entendre that hinted at a sexual act). Still, Comedy Central yanked that episode from rotation the day after Charlie’s assassination.

I was no fan of Charlie Kirk, and I disagreed with most of his political beliefs. Nevertheless, I respected him for his commitment to civil discourse. He seldom raised his voice, never used foul language, never engaged in degrading name-calling, and so far as we know, he never betrayed his faith or his family. In life, Charlie didn’t call for his critics to be censored, fired, or suspended, so it seems ironic that both his supporters and detractors want to silence each other now that he’s gone.

 
 


Botched Branding

Posted September 9, 2025 By Triad Today
Detail of the old Cracker Barrel logo

Detail of the old Cracker Barrel logo
My late cousin Hannah Campbell was the first accomplished writer in our extended family. In the 1960s, her articles appeared in a number of national publications, including Cosmopolitan for which she penned a monthly column titled “Why Did They Name it?” about the origins of famous brands and companies. Later, she compiled her research into a book by the same name and sent me a signed copy. I was fascinated by her stories, like the one about a young man who was working in a Virginia drug store when he fell in love with the daughter of the store owner. The young suitor was fired, traveled west, and invented an innovative soft drink which he named after the drug store owner — a medical doctor named Pepper.

Cousin Hannah sparked my interest in writing and advertising, both which would later serve me well when, in addition to producing TV shows, I also ran a small ad agency where I was occasionally called upon to create product names and slogans. Along the way, I learned a valuable lesson about branding from an unlikely source. In May 1977, Bert Lance, director of the OMB under President Jimmy Carter, told Nation’s Business magazine, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”

Coincidentally, that same year, Nashville designer Bill Holley created a logo for a brand new restaurant chain that would serve good old country cookin’. The logo featured an illustration of an old man sitting in a wooden chair and leaning on a large barrel. The name adjacent to the logo was Cracker Barrel. It was a welcoming sign to hungry travelers for 56 years…until late last month when company CEO Julie Masino forgot to heed Bert Lance’s advice. She and her ad agency decided to go for a more modern image, and suddenly the old timer, his chair, and the barrel all disappeared. Needless to say, the Cracker Barrel universe was collectively pissedSocial media blew up, and company stock prices tumbled. Within days, Masino reversed course and restored the old logo.

Change for change’s sake is never a good idea, yet there always seems to be some corporate marketing executive who’s willing to fiddle with success in order to justify his salary and impress the boss. For example, Master Card removed its own name from its iconic orange and yellow intersecting circles. Petco removed the dog and cat from its logo. And Eskimo Pie changed its name to Edy’s Pie as if we’d all care that the frozen treat was created by Joseph Edy.    

Remember “New Coke” from 1985? That disaster was the creation of a corporate executive who thought it would be a good idea to add more sugar to Coke’s formula in order to better compete with Pepsi. CEO Robert Goiuzeta told reporters at the time that it was “the surest move we ever made.” Loyal Coke drinkers disagreed. According to the History Channel, the company received 8,000 complaint calls per day, and shares of stock were headed in the wrong direction. Within months, New Coke was out and “Coca-Cola Classic” was born. The Coke fiasco should have served as a warning to all future beverage makers, but a few folks at Budweiser didn’t get the memo.

In 2023, Bud Light featured social media personality Dylan Mulvaney in a promotional video. The only problem was that Mulvaney is transgender. Millions of conservative Bud drinkers boycotted the parent company, stock prices fell by 26%, and Bud Light lost its top spot to Modelo after having been number one for 20 years. Alissa Heinerscheid, who had been VP of marketing for less than a year, was responsible for changing Bud Light’s gender, saying she was only trying to make the drink “more inclusive.” Not surprisingly, Heinerscheid was fired.

Of course, inclusivity can be a good thing if a name or logo has become offensive to consumers. Uncle Ben’s rice, Aunt Jemima Pancake mix, and the Washington Redskins all come to mind. But it makes no business sense to trash a name or image just for the sake of creativity. If my cousin Hannah were alive today, she would probably be writing a sequel to “Why Did They Name It?” and title it, “Why Did They Change It?” or,” WTF is Wrong with Cracker Barrel?”

 
 


School CFO Should Be Held Accountable

Posted August 26, 2025 By Triad Today

An audit, by definition, is an independent inspection of financial accounts. It is helpful for examining line items, but not so much for reading between the lines. For example, an audit can tell you if money was misspent, but it can’t tell you the intent of the person who did the misspending. That’s because auditors are experts in finance, not criminal law or psychology. And that brings me to a recently concluded audit of the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools, which attempted to explain an unprecedented budgetary fiasco that is about to have a disastrous effect on thousands of students, and hundreds of teachers, administrators, families, and vendors.

The financial woes of WS/FCS have been building for several years but were only recently revealed to the school board and the public. We now know that the N.C. Department of Public Instruction had sent numerous notices and reminders to former school CFO Thomas Kranz about deadlines for submitting an audit. But according to various news reports, superintendent Trish McManus and the school board indicated that they knew nothing about those notices, much less why Kranz had been dragging his heels. They also didn’t know that Kranz had routinely misappropriated federal, state, and county funds, moving money from one pot into another so that Peter could pay Paul. For example, he used county funds designated to pay SROs and nurses for covering other expenses. Aside from being unethical (and potentially illegal), such misdirection left the school district in dire financial straits, the full extent of which Kranz initially kept from McManus. Apparently, he first told her that the school district was $8 million short and unable to meet payroll for the balance of the current fiscal year.

And so, in March of this year, seeing only the tip of the iceberg, McManus informed the board of the $8 million deficit and laid out a strategy for balancing the books over the remaining three months. Her plan included only using state funds for summer school programs, freezing new hires and freezing spending unless for essential purchases, eliminating long-term substitutes, and reallocating central office staff. She would also hire HIL consultants to conduct an official audit, which was now past due, with DPI threatening punitive action. But when McManus made her report to the board, she was unaware of just how deep a hole Kranz had put WS/FCS in.

Knowing that the shit was about to hit the fan, Kranz announced that he would be retiring in June and, despite his incompetence, McManus publicly praised the CFO for his service. Little did she know that a financial tsunami was about to make landfall. Not long after she announced her cost-cutting plan, McManus learned that the shortfall wasn’t $8 million. Instead, it was over $40 million and growing, including $11 million owed to the state, and millions more owed to vendors and to the county. By the time that news leaked out, McManus announced she too would be retiring, and Kranz’s last day was moved up a month.

Former State School Board member and veteran educator Catty Moore was brought in to serve as interim superintendent and clean up the financial mess. Her first move was to ask the Forsyth County Board of Commissioners to bail out the schools and pony up the entire $42 million. Predictably, the Commissioners rejected her proposal but later voted to give her $8.6 million, provided that the money goes toward paying down the DPI debt. Moore also hoped that DPI would help out by waiving interest charges on the debt owed, but that request fell flat. Moreover, for some strange reason, she allegedly waited for nearly two months before asking Triad area state legislators to intercede. Some, like Rep. Donny Lambeth, made it known that it wasn’t the state’s responsibility to bail out a local school district. Nevertheless, a face-to-face meeting with state lawmakers has been scheduled for September.

And that brings me back to the audit. On Aug. 13, HIS submitted a 39-page report which concluded that WS/FCS was guilty of years of financial mismanagement, but that there was no evidence of fraud. The former conclusion was predictable, and the latter was welcome news to Moore, the school board, and to District Attorney Jim O’Neil, who now has justification for not prosecuting anyone. But the good news was short-lived because that same day, Moore informed her board that despite help from the county, WS/FCS would have to eliminate up to 350 positions. The Winston-Salem Journal’s Lisa O’Donnell observed Moore wiping tears of sadness from her eyes while delivering the bad news. Perhaps she was crying for the 350 families whose lives will be forever changed, or for the vendors who might never get paid, or for the students who may have their favorite course or activity eliminated. It is also sad that those people most affected by this debacle may never get closure. That’s because the audit told us a lot about accounts, but nothing about accountability, and that brings us to the villain of this tragic story.

It looks like CFO Tommy Kranz is off the hook for his misdeeds, but he shouldn’t be. True, he doesn’t appear to have profited financially from his fiscal mismanagement, but according to the state code, misappropriation of funds is still a form of embezzlement. He may also not be guilty of malfeasance, but he certainly seems to be guilty of misfeasance. He also kept his ongoing misappropriations a secret from the folks he reported to, and he is singularly responsible for hundreds of jobs that will be lost. But hey, we all make mistakes, and so what if Kranz was grossly incompetent? After all, this is his first offense, right? Wrong.

Kranz once served as CFO and interim superintendent of Richmond, Va. public schools, where, according to the Richmond Free Press, he kept $8.3 million in a secret “unassigned fund balance” while asking the city council to pony up an additional $16 million to make up for budget shortfalls. At the same time, he hired Dallas Dance (a front-runner for the superintendent’s job) as a “consultant,” paying him $24,000 for two months work. This while Dance was still under investigation by Maryland authorities for a relationship he had with an Illinois company while he served as superintendent of Baltimore schools. All of this was kept from the Richmond school board. The Free Press story ran in September 2017, and by February 2018, Kranz was fired as CFO.

The question is, were McManus and the WS/FCS Board aware of Kranz’s past problems in Richmond? If so, Kranz should never have been hired. If not, then why didn’t they do their due diligence? The fact is that Tommy Kranz appears to be a serial misappropriator, so perhaps it would be appropriate for the hundreds of people who stand to lose their jobs to enter into a class action against him when the time comes. If successful, it might mitigate the damage about to befall them, and send a message to superintendents and school board members everywhere to pay more attention to the books and to those who might cook them.

 
 


Heinous Drinking

Posted August 19, 2025 By Triad Today

Here in North Carolina, the death penalty is only imposed when someone has been convicted of first-degree murder and only then when the crime was deemed to be “heinous.” Well, we sure must have a lot of heinous going on here because our state has the fifth-largest death row population in the nation. However, the last time we executed anyone was in 2006, mainly because, like many other states, North Carolina is moving away from death penalty sentencing in favor of life without parole. No doubt a life sentence is more humane than the electric chair or lethal injection, and it ensures that innocent men aren’t put to death. The problem is that the criteria remain pretty much the same for life without parole as it is for the death penalty. That means under current law, an entire category of killers may never see the inside of a prison, much less spend the rest of their lives there.

In 2017, a Forsyth County man got drunk, drove his car at high speeds, and crashed, killing his passenger. He was charged with felony death by motor vehicle and ordered to serve a maximum of five years in prison. Why such a light sentence? First, because his misdeed wasn’t considered murder or heinous, and second, because the judge found that the man had no criminal record. In 2023, a drunken driver was operating a golf cart when she struck and killed a young Charlotte woman. The driver was convicted of DWI homicide and sentenced to serve a maximum of 10 years.

And that brings me to Quinten Kight and Annemarie Flanigan, who just last week were charged with “death by impaired boating.” That’s right, the pair got drunk and ran over a 10-year-old girl who was swimming in Harris Lake. The little girl died instantly. We won’t know for a while how a court will rule, but I’ll guarantee that the sentence will be similar to that of every other drunk driving case in recent memory.

In any event, you can bet that the ruling will be light and inconsistent.

Here in North Carolina, sentencing in drunk driving cases varies from county to county and from judge to judge, and the discrepancy can be huge. Many years ago, the Charlotte Observer reported that judges in some counties convict 90 percent of drunk drivers while judges in other counties only convict 10 percent. Overall, our judges acquit about one-third of all drunk drivers. Even worse, according to M.A.D.D., one-third of people convicted of drunk driving are repeat offenders. Talk about catch and release! Tragically, many of those repeat offenders eventually cause the death of one or more persons.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 37 Americans die in drunk driving crashes every day. That’s one death every 39 minutes, and the problem is getting worse. Drunk driving deaths were up 14 percent from 2020 to 2021. Want another horrible statistic? According to the Centers for Disease Control, intoxicated drivers get behind the wheel no less than 112 million times per year. And that doesn’t count drunks who operate ATVs, boats, or golf carts. Yet, for some reason, judges, prosecutors, and society at large don’t treat drunk driving killers the same way as we do other killers.

Let’s be clear about something. Driving drunk is no accident. It is a premeditated act, and when that act results in the death of another person, then that is murder, and every murder is heinous, just ask the families of victims. Here in North Carolina, a drunk driver can get off scot-free if no one was injured, if he has no criminal record, and is a pillar of the community. That then puts the car keys back in his hands and enables him to drive drunk again, which could result in an alcohol-related death. The only way to abate these tragic situations is to mandate a year in prison for first-time drunk driving and life in prison without parole for death by impaired driving. Otherwise, we’re letting drunks drive around with a loaded weapon that’s just waiting to go off, and I can’t think of anything more heinous than that.

 
 


Andy Huggins: It’s Hip to Be Old

Posted August 12, 2025 By Triad Today
Comedian Andy Huggins

Comedian Andy Huggins
There are only a handful of stand-up comedians whose approach to the genre has been transformative, among them, Richard Pryor, George Carlin, Jerry Seinfeld, Rodney Dangerfield, and more recently Nate Bargatze and Leanne Morgan. Pryor revolutionized modern-day storytelling. Carlin was a master wordsmith. Seinfeld took observation comedy to new heights. Dangerfield morphed his tag line into a career of one-liners. Bargatze and his signature pauses elevated the art of self-deprecation, and Leanne Morgan is proving that women everywhere can identify with a mom from the South. And just when we thought there was no more new comedy ground to break, Andy Huggins appears on the scene.

Huggins is the Rodney Dangerfield of geriatrics. Rodney built his entire act from one premise, and so too has Andy. For Dangerfield, it was “I get no respect.” For Huggins, it is “It’s tough getting old.” I can relate to Andy’s comedy. He is 75 years old and I’m nearly 72. But his brand of humor also makes young people laugh out loud. Just take a look at his act on YouTube and you’ll see why his universal appeal is going viral.

Andy is funny because of his material and his delivery. His pauses before the joke line are as artful as Bargatze’s, and his one-liners are not one-dimensional. They aren’t just about his age; rather, they are commentaries on current trends.

 


“As far as social media goes, you can follow me on the bulletin board at Kroger’s.”

“I’m not on Twitter, but I will stop people on the street and tell them shit they’re not interested in.”



 

Those kinds of jokes point to what happens when we age, but they also poke fun at the absurdity of our reliance on posting and sharing every thought that comes into our heads.

Andy also makes fun of phrases and trends that inhabit our politically correct world.

 


“I have an inner child, but I don’t think it’s mine.”

“I’m woke…for about another five hours.”

“I took a quiz on Facebook called, ‘What’s your spirit animal?’ I got ‘Extinct.’”

“I’m 75 years old, and life expectancy for a man is 76. Life expectancy for a woman is 81. I figure if I transition…”



 

Earlier this year, Andy signed on to do his first comedy special, which can be seen on Apple TV and Prime Video. Yet despite his meteoric rise to fame, Andy is not an overnight success. He has been performing stand-up for 40 years. Asked by NPR’s Scott Simon about developing an act around his advanced age, Huggins said, “It’s what I know better than anything at the moment. I write what I’m familiar with, and age is inescapable. Age is a fact of life.”

It’s also a fact that audiences love Andy’s brand of humor. And, thanks to the internet and a plethora of streaming services, he’s reaching more and more people every day. “It’s so deeply satisfying,” he told Simon. “So deeply reassuring that I’ve got a useful purpose while I’m still alive.”

Truth is, none of us knows how much time we have left, yet we hope that we can make the most of it and somehow make a lasting contribution. Young Andy Huggins has done that in a big way.

“A couple of Saturdays ago, before I went onstage, I asked the club manager, ‘How much time do I have?’ He said, ‘Can’t be much.’”

We all hope that club manager is wrong.

 
 


Scammers are Nothing New

Posted July 29, 2025 By Triad Today

I was listening to an episode of “The Howard Stern Show” recently, in which he interviewed a caller whose mother had been scammed by someone with the AI-generated voice of actor Liam Neeson. As the story goes, the fake Liam pretended to be in love with the caller’s mom and needed her to send him money for a project he was working on.

Over a period of time, fake Liam asked for more and more financial support while promising to marry the woman. The caller told Howard that he had tried to tell his mom she was being duped, but to no avail. At first, I thought this was just another Stern comedy bit, but later, there were more callers complaining of similar situations with their moms. Then, last week, I read an article in The Hollywood Reporter that detailed a rash of celebrity scams, including the story of a 73-year-old divorcee who met a fake Kevin Costner on Facebook. Fake Kevin pretended to be in love with this woman and asked her to fund a new film project he was working on. Over a period of several months, the woman made bitcoin deposits to fake Kevin worth over $100,000. Again, I refused to believe that this was a widespread problem, but I was wrong.

THR cited a study by the FBI saying that in 2024 alone, “Americans reported $672 million in losses to confidence and romance scams,” and elderly folks suffered the most, averaging $83,000 per victim. Even worse, those statistics do not include untold thousands of victims like the aforementioned 73-year-old divorcee who were too embarrassed to file a complaint. Other AI and social media-generated scams have included celebrities like Keanu Reeves, Dolly Parton, and Oprah Winfrey, in which victims were fooled into giving the criminals their bank account numbers, credit card numbers, and the passwords to access those accounts.

In addition to the FBI, the Federal Trade Commission also keeps track of scams. Last year, the FTC filed 2.6 million fraud reports, representing a loss of $12.5 billion to victims. Of that amount, social media scams alone accounted for $1.9 billion. But scams also occur through phone calls, emails, texts, and the Internet.

Certainly, celebrity-related romance scams have garnered the most attention of late, but criminals are also making money from a host of other scams, including employment scams which target unemployed folks, have them fill out an application, then use their personal information to rob their bank and credit card accounts.

All of this is disturbing to be sure, but we shouldn’t be surprised because scammers have been around forever.

They are like some sort of prehistoric insect that adapts to new environments in order to thrive. They have evolved by using whatever forum or technology was available to best suit their purpose. In the 19th century, so-called medicine men traveled around the Old West hawking bottles of snake oil, which supposedly cured all ills. Gullible townsfolk bought the concoction only to discover it was just cheap whiskey.

In later years, con men would pose as preachers and hold tent revivals where they fleeced money from patrons hoping to be healed. That evolved into televangelists who asked viewers to purchase a prayer cloth or special holy water if they wanted to be saved. And when email became a common way of communicating, the fraudsters pretended to be someone you know who is stranded overseas and needs money to get home. These indestructible creatures never give up and never stop coming up with new ways to scam us.

To date, some 400 celebrities have signed on to support the “No Fakes Act,” which, if passed by Congress, would protect their likeness and images from AI scams. Unfortunately, though, there’s not much that us common folks can do to outsmart scammers and fraudsters except to stay on guard and stay grounded in reality. A credit card company or bank that you have an account with is never going to call you out of the blue and ask for your information. Kevin Costner is never going to meet you on social media and ask you for money. And no one you know is going to email you and ask you to immediately wire them funds so they can get home from Europe. There is only one foolproof way I know of that can protect you against every kind of scam in the world, and I’ll be glad to share it with you if you mail me a cashier’s check for $2,000 c/o YES! Weekly. Sincerely, fake Jim.

 
 

facebook marketing