
Last week, a 10-year-old boy was bullied, not by another student online, but by an adult writing on official government stationery. The boy is Christian Mango, a fourth grader at Canterbury School in Greensboro. The bully is 82-year-old Virginia Foxx, an 11-term Congresswoman serving North Carolina’s fifth district, who represents some 750,000 people, including young master Mango.
Here’s how it all went down. Christian was given a school assignment in persuasive writing, so he elected to write his Congresswoman to persuade her to support a $5,000 tax rebate for anyone who purchases a new electric vehicle.
Instead of saying how impressed she was with his concern for the environment, Foxx criticized Christian’s teacher for spreading propaganda. Her malicious missive didn’t stop there. Wrote Foxx, “My guess is that your teachers will not give you a good educational experience and help you learn to think, as they are too interested in indoctrinating you.”
What the f**k, Virginia?! We’re talking about a 10-year-old child, not someone at the EPA who just leaked government secrets to the Russians. This boy did nothing to disparage or attack you. He just wanted to engage you in a dialogue about a policy issue.
I don’t know Christian Mango, but it turns out that I do know about being 10 years old and writing something I thought was important. It was 1964, and my Cub Scout leader encouraged me to enter the Freedom Foundation’s annual essay competition. The theme of my paper was “Why I Love America.” Imagine my surprise when I received word that I had won. The award consisted of a bronze medallion with my name inscribed right under a profile of George Washington. I was on cloud nine because my parents, teachers, and scout leader all bragged on me. That’s how adults are supposed to act when a 10-year-old boy takes the initiative to write about his beliefs. Without that kind of positive reinforcement, a kid could become discouraged. Virginia Foxx should know that because she used to be a teacher.
Ms. Foxx appeared on my television show a number of times back when she was still new to the Washington scene. In those days, we got along quite well, so much so that in 2005, she presented a resolution to Congress that recognized Triad Today for our commitment to voter education. Interestingly enough, she also used that occasion to praise the news media for the crucial role it plays in society. It was a grand gesture from a woman who began her political career as a hard-working advocate for her constituents. Her tireless efforts in that regard harkened back to her youth when she worked part-time as a school janitor in order to help support her family. Somewhere along the way, though, Virginia morphed into a very angry person who is increasingly given to rude outbursts when anyone asks or says something that she doesn’t like.
Three years ago, I wrote a column titled “Time for Foxx to Retire”. In that article, I recounted how she had frightened senior citizens away from supporting the Affordable Care Act by telling them that Obama intended to establish “death camps” for older people. She once called the brutal murder of Matthew Shepard a hoax. She defended the actions of insurrectionists on Jan. 6 and, right afterward, threw a temper tantrum when asked to walk through metal detectors leading to the House Chamber. Two years ago, when fellow Republican colleague Byron Donalds was speaking with reporters, Foxx yelled at him, saying, “Get away from the damned elevator. Move!” And her bullying ways were also on display at an impromptu press conference for newly elected House Speaker Mike Johnson. On that day, a reporter from ABC News asked Johnson about his role in trying to overturn the 2020 election. But before the affable Johnson could even respond, Foxx pushed her way in front of the gaggle and shouted to the reporter, “Shut up! Shut Up!” This from a woman who once praised the fourth estate as a “guardian of democracy.”
Obviously, my column back in 2023 did not persuade Ms. Foxx to retire, but perhaps widespread negative reaction to her exchange with Christian Mango will succeed where I had failed. In fact, last week, Michael Garrett, who represents Guilford County in the state legislature, called on Foxx to resign. Writing on Facebook, Garrett said, “You do not slam the door on a child reaching for democracy…a child wrote you a letter…and you called his teachers liars. That is not policy disagreement. That is a loss of soul. It is time to go.”
For what it’s worth, I second that sentiment. First, because I know what it feels like to be a 10-year-old boy seeking validation from adults, and second, because as Capt. Woodrow Call said in “Lonesome Dove,” “I can’t stand rude behavior.” Virginia, I don’t know why you have become so angry and so intolerant, but at this point, I really don’t care. To quote Debbie Harry, “Don’t go away mad, just go away.”





























Posted June 2, 2026 By Triad TodayLate-Night Talk Shows On the Way Out?
Much has been written about the controversies over late-night television, including the recent cancellation of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, and the temporary suspension of Jimmy Kimmel last fall. Certainly, both instances were triggered by networks, corporations, and television station groups trying to curry favor with the White House. For example, Paramount Global and Skydance Media needing federal approval to move forward with their merger, and Nexstar’s pending deal to buy Tegna. Left unchecked, these kinds of political appeasements could very well lead to the demise of late-night, network TV talk shows as we now know them.
No doubt Paramount and Nexstar couldn’t afford to alienate the FCC when they both had deals pending that would greatly benefit their stockholders. That’s why CBS had agreed to pay Trump $36 million dollars over the so-called “edited” 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris. That’s why ABC paid Trump $15 million dollars after George Stephanopoulos mischaracterized candidate Trump’s role in the alleged rape of E. Jean Carroll. That’s why CBS/Paramount agreed to take Colbert off the air so that he would no longer have a national forum for nightly Trump-bashing. And that’s why Nexstar joined with ABC and Sinclair to call for dismissal of Kimmel over an ill-timed joke about Charlie Kirk. Yes, broadcasters need to make money, but when they give in to political pressure in order to facilitate their own expansive greed, then they have failed to serve their primary stockholder: the public who own the airwaves.
But if the talk genre should disappear from the television landscape, a lot of the blame will lie at the feet of the hosts themselves. That’s because the new breed of monologists haven’t adhered to the time-honored tradition of how humor should be disseminated on free TV. Johnny Carson dominated late-night for 30 years because he knew how to appeal to a wide audience and do political humor without being political. Letterman and Leno never veered too far from Carson’s example, but Kimmel, Colbert, Seth Meyers, and (to some extent) Jimmy Fallon have disregarded it, thus alienating half of their potential viewers in the process. The result is less ad revenue and higher production deficits for the networks.
Don’t get me wrong. As a broadcast veteran of 56 years, I believe strongly in freedom of expression, and I abhor any form of censorship, whether it comes through intimidation or extortion. No one should lose their job for speaking truth to power, but they CAN lose their job if they lose sight of their primary mission. For hosts of network TV shows, that mission is to entertain and hold as many viewers as possible. It’s different for guys like Bill Maher, John Oliver, and Jon Stewart because they appear on pay cable and can be openly partisan with their smaller, niche audiences. Kimmel and Colbert can’t afford that luxury. Bill Maher learned that lesson when his original show was cancelled by ABC after he referred to 9/11 terrorists as heroes. His comment was taken out of context by advertisers and the Bush White House, but the handwriting was on the wall, and Bill packed his bags for HBO.
Sometimes you have to stand up to intimidation. Sometimes you have to take a stand against politics and avarice (and the politics of avarice). But if you host a network show which is broadcast over publicly owned airwaves, you need to learn how to entertain the masses without offending half of them, or else face the consequences. Colbert has just launched his own YouTube channel and will now be free to bash anyone and anything within tasteful bounds. My advice to Kimmel, Meyers, and Fallon is to either launder partisan politics from their monologues or else abandon network television before it abandons them.