
If a local, publicly owned industry were to misspend and lose $46 million, putting over 300 people out of work, there are several important things that we expect would happen. First, we expect debts to be paid and the losses to be recovered. Second, we expect that the lost jobs will be restored. Third, we expect the company to enact necessary reforms to prevent future debacles. Fourth, we expect the company to do all it can to rebuild the public trust. And finally, WE EXPECT ANYONE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MESS TO BE PUNISHED!!!
I am, of course, referring to the largest publicly-owned industry in our community—the Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools, and the devastating financial crisis its leadership caused. Yes, there are folks who say, “It’s time to move on.” “It’s time to put those troubles behind us and focus on the future.” The problem is that it’s nearly impossible to move on without closure, and we can’t have that unless and until the guilty parties are brought to account.
Last spring, it was discovered that WS/FCS CFO Tommy Kranz had, over a period of several years, misappropriated and misapplied local, state, and federal funds, leaving the schools in a $46 million hole. That left us unable to pay employees and vendors, or to reimburse the county for SROs and other services. It even left us unable to pay the interest on what we owed to the N.C. Department of Public Instruction. Kranz suddenly retired and got the hell out of Dodge. So did Superintendent Tricia McManus. It was an easy departure for the duo because neither had deep ties to the Triad. McManus kept her permanent residence in Florida while working here, and Kranz had come here from Virginia, where, according to the Richmond Free Press, he had engaged in the same kind of behavior that would repeat itself in Winston-Salem. More on that in a moment.
By late last year, auditors and local prosecutors concluded that no crime had been committed, but they were wrong. True enough, there is no evidence to suggest that Kranz, McManus, or members of the school board profited financially from the multi-million-dollar mess. Nevertheless, according to state law, misappropriation of public funds still falls under the category of embezzlement. The truth is that Kranz deliberately moved funds around in an illegal fashion and caused irreparable harm to over 300 families and to the community at large. The other hard truth is that neither McManus nor the school board bothered to do a deep dive on Kranz’s record in Richmond, Virginia where he had served as CFO and interim superintendent, and where (according to the Richmond Free Press) he kept $8.3 million in a secret “unassigned fund balance” while asking city council to pony up an additional $16 million to make up for budget shortfalls. At the same time, he paid a friend $24,000 for two months of consulting work even though that man was still under investigation by Maryland authorities. When all of this finally came to light, Kranz was fired. Had McManus and the board done their due diligence, Kranz would have never been hired in the first place.
Our community is fortunate to have organizations like the Winston-Salem Foundation and companies like Modern Auto, which stepped up with major donations to help erase the school’s debts and lend a hand to teachers. And we look forward to newly-appointed superintendent Don Phipps taking on the task of reform. He has a sterling reputation and a track record to suggest that he can restore the WS/FCS to a level of performance that we haven’t seen since the days of Dr. Don Martin, who led the schools for 19 unsullied years.
And yet, there’s still the matter of closure. Kranz was incompetent, and McManus was a very compassionate and trusting individual who allowed Kranz to operate in a vacuum. Their shortcomings were dissimilar to be sure, but together they perpetrated an unprecedented crime on our community. They should both be held to account for the damage they caused. Then and only then can we put this ugly chapter behind us and be assured that it will never happen again.




























Posted February 10, 2026 By Triad TodayAmericans Need a Voting License
There’s no doubt that our nation is ruled by elites, but then, it always has been. The founding fathers were all highly educated men with (pardon the expression) revolutionary ideals, but they also believed that only landowners should have the right to vote and hold office. Today, that way of thinking would disenfranchise tens of millions of people who pay rent instead of a mortgage. Still, there should be some criteria for being able to participate in the political process. As it stands now, there are only a few restrictions on voting privileges, among them: you must be registered, you must be a citizen, you must not be a felon, and you must have voted in a recent election. The problem is that these criteria have everything to do with procedure and nothing to do with competence.
To that point, Georgetown University professor Jason Brennan believes that most voters are ignorant, biased, and misinformed. His solution is for our democracy to operate as an “epistocracy” whereby the right to vote is conditional on knowledge. Brennan suggests we establish some type of national competency exam to determine whether an individual is capable of casting an informed vote. Under his proposal, we could either use the United States citizenship test, or develop something new, so long as it is drafted in a non-partisan manner and not based on the ideologies of any one political party or group. It’s a sound approach, and one that party hacks in Georgia should have heeded.
Not long ago, the Republican Party of Catoosa County, Georgia, required all potential GOP candidates to answer a series of ideological questions in order to get on the ballot under the party banner. However, candidates whose responses were rejected by party leaders and who were kept off the ballot as a result ended up suing the county. The rejected candidates prevailed, the GOP paid hefty fines, and their loyalty test was scrapped. Today, political parties require candidates to sign a loyalty oath, but that doesn’t ensure a competent slate of candidates, just as registering to vote doesn’t ensure a competent electorate, and that brings me back to the concept of a national voting license.
According to a survey by the Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation, only one in three Americans would be able to pass the U.S. citizenship test, and according to goodparty.org, “Americans can’t even pass a standard civics test” adding, “Voter education is not just an accessory to the democratic process, but rather the cornerstone upon which a thriving democracy is built.”
Voter ignorance wasn’t much of a problem a hundred years ago because civics education was required at every grade level. The Heritage Foundation recalls a textbook from 1928, which stated that civics classes “strive to develop character in the student and produce an effective citizen.” Today, 30 states require only one semester of civics in order to graduate high school, while 11 states require no civics at all. Only nine states require a full year of civics in order to graduate. Clearly, we need to do a better job of teaching students how to understand and navigate our system of government, but until then, we shouldn’t be content to let millions of uninformed voters determine the outcome of local, State, and federal elections. That’s why every state should require its citizens to pass a basic knowledge exam before being issued a voting license, which, like DMV licenses, would have to be renewed periodically.
I don’t want to be on the highway next to someone who is unqualified to drive, and I don’t want to be at the polls next to someone who is too uninformed to vote. Both scenarios have dangerous consequences.