Commentaries Archive


McCrory Keeps Getting Attacked

Posted April 30, 2019 By Triad Today
Pat McCrory

Pat McCrory
Last week Pat McCrory pulled up to an intersection in Charlotte, and politely stopped his car to let a man cross the street. The man looked at McCrory and started shouting that he recognized the former governor. The shouting then turned to cursing. Oh yes, and the man, who McCrory described as about 6’2” and built like a pro wrestler, was also carrying a tree limb with which he used to pound on the top of McCrory’s sedan. According to a police report, the man did about $600 worth of damage to McCrory’s car. Fortunately, Pat and his wife Ann (who was in the passenger seat) were not injured.

In a sense, the crosswalk attack was like a tangible metaphor for what McCrory’s life has been like these past three years. Take, for instance, what happened in Washington back in January of 2017. Pat and FOX Business anchor Lou Dobbs were strolling along a sidewalk in front of the Capitol Hilton, when an angry mob gathered and chased Pat into an alley. Within moments, Dobbs, his entourage, and D.C. police were able to rescue McCrory, but not before the former governor had been bombarded with shouts of, “Shame on you, you anti-gay bigot! You’re a bigot and an asshole!”

It’s a sad fact, but Pat McCrory seems to have a bullseye painted on his chest which attracts all sorts of slings, arrows, and outrageous tree limbs. However, as I’ve pointed out in past columns, the attacks on McCrory are misdirected and unjustified. To this day, most people only remember Pat for what they think was his role in passing the Public Facilities Privacy and Security Act, AKA HB2, AKA the “Bathroom bill”, AKA the “You can only use bathrooms that correspond to your biological sex” bill. Not only are provisions of the bill often misunderstood, but so is Pat’s role in signing it. Many folks believe McCrory planned, wrote, and lobbied for HB2, a law which large corporations, big name entertainers, and cowardly sports leagues, used as an excuse for not doing business in North Carolina. Truth is, Pat tried to stop the Republican-controlled General Assembly from passing HB2. In the end he was forced to sign a bill that he neither sought nor supported, in order to adhere to provisions in the state constitution which prevent local governments from assuming powers not given to them by the legislature. In a nutshell, here’s what happened.

In 2016, then-Attorney General Roy Cooper was running to unseat McCrory, who had been a successful, seven-term, coalition-building mayor of Charlotte. As governor, Pat tried to bring that same kind of bi-partisanship to Raleigh, including working with Democrats to pass an historic two-billion-dollar bond package that would modernize college campus facilities. He resurrected the state’s lagging economy, lowered unemployment, and under his leadership, North Carolina outpaced the nation in economic growth. Meanwhile, Donald Trump was poised to lead a GOP sweep through North Carolina. Cooper needed a miracle to beat McCrory, and Charlotte Democratic Mayor Jennifer Roberts handed it to him, giftwrapped. She and her council added “gender identity” as a protected class under the city’s public accommodations ordinance, and planned to enact and enforce it in a matter of days. If, for example, a business owner didn’t allow men who “identified” as women to use the women’s bathroom, then that owner would face a fine and possible jail time.

“I begged Mayor Roberts not to pass the ordinance,” Pat told me during a Triad Today interview. “I wrote her a letter saying, ‘You’re trying to find a solution to a problem that doesn’t exist’. The Attorney General should have declared the ordinance unconstitutional and intervened immediately, but he refused to do it because he was in the pocket, doing fundraisers with Mayor Roberts.”

By July of 2016, economic boycotts were piling up, but a little-known bi-partisan deal was in the works that would have removed enough controversial language from HB2 to end most of those boycotts. The compromise bill was supported by nearly every House Republican and by ten House Democrats. But according to a report by WBTV’s Nick Ochsner, Cooper torpedoed the effort by pressuring the ten Dems to vote against the bill.

Cooper stood by and watched HB2 burn red-hot because he knew it was his ticket to the governor’s mansion. Then, after taking office, he signed into law a so-called repeal of HB2, titled, HB142, which was a cosmetic bill with no teeth, designed to placate those who had boycotted our state. Ironically, HB142 pretty much just restored the status quo, and left gender identity issues up to the courts to resolve, something McCrory had wanted from the very start.

And so, boys and girls, Roy Cooper became governor by not enforcing the state constitution, while Pat McCrory became a private citizen for upholding it. Cooper got where he is by keeping HB2 alive, while McCrory got where he is by trying to prevent it. Today, Roy gets to go to ribbon cuttings, while Pat gets to be cursed at and have his car bashed with tree limbs. It’s just my opinion, but I think the wrong man is getting attacked.
 
 


Would a Third Party Make Any Difference?

Posted April 23, 2019 By Triad Today
Graphic showing a question mark for a third political party

Graphic showing a Democrat donkey, Republican elephant, and a question mark for a third political party
Last week, Meredith College released a new poll showing that 56.7% of North Carolina voters believe a third political party would be good for our state and the nation. Moreover, those respondents agreed with a survey statement that said “…the two major parties do not do an adequate job of representing Americans.”

The Meredith poll results will come as no surprise to anyone who follows Tar Heel politics. After all, those of us who are registered as “Unaffiliated”, comprise the second largest voting block in the state, now numbering 2.1 million. That compares to 2.5 million registered Democrats, and 2 million Republicans.

Unfortunately, “Unaffiliated” is a designation, and not a political party. Absent being the latter, we alternative-seeking voters have always had a plethora of splinter parties to choose from. During the 2016 presidential election for example, there were 36 nationally recognized political parties, including the Libertarian party, the Green party, and the Socialist party. There were also over 30 active parties indigenous to particular states, like the Vermont Progressive party. The problem is that none of these parties have stood a chance in Hades of putting their candidate into federal office. In order to be viable, a political party has to be able to amass enough votes to win control of the White House, or a chamber of Congress, and right now, no such alternative party has that kind of strength.

In all fairness, though, the two major parties have done everything they can to prevent a national third party from becoming viable, including setting the bar high for upstarts who might dilute their power. For example, here in the Old North State, if a third party candidate wants to get on the ballot in 2020, her party must have garnered 2% of the total votes cast in 2016. Absent that, she must collect names totaling 2% of the votes cast in the last gubernatorial election. Since over 4.6 million people voted for Cooper and McCrory, that means a third party candidate for president must collect over 9,000 signatures if she wants her name to appear on the ballot.

But let’s not forget that there are 2.1 million unaffiliated voters registered in North Carolina, so if we all organized into the official Unaffiliated Party, and if our counterparts in the other 49 states do the same thing, we can be a viable force, capable of winning elections instead of spoiling them. The down side is that once that happens, it won’t be long before leaders in the Unaffiliated party will require our candidates to only support other Unaffiliated candidates, and once they’re elected, only vote for legislation that is endorsed by the Unaffiliated leadership. In time, our grand new party would become as partisan as the two old parties. That’s because when we humans get organized, we tend to become more tribal. We conform rather than question. We become less independent and more intolerant. Even worse, we often lose sight of the principals which brought us together in the first place. Just think about some of the early settlers who came to America in order to escape religious persecution, then immediately started burning witches and redacting Mueller reports.

Ironically, the Constitution makes no mention of political parties, and yet today, the two major parties are charged with interpreting, amending, and subverting that very document. With all due respect to the Meredith poll respondents, forming a nationally viable third party might seem like the best way to “adequately represent the needs of Americans”, but it might also just lead to more partisan gridlock. There’s one last thing to consider. In 2016, third party candidates siphoned off votes in key states that would have gone to Hillary, and that put Trump in the White House. If you’re among the 2.1 million unaffiliated folks in North Carolina, or the 56.7% who say we need a third party, you might want to reflect on 2016, and be a little less independent in 2020.

 
 


“Crash” Craddock to Perform at High Point Theatre

Posted April 16, 2019 By Triad Today
Billy Crash Craddock on the set of Triad Today

Billy Crash Craddock (left) on the set of Triad Today with Jim Longworth
Growing up in Greensboro, Billy Wayne Craddock loved two things, football and music.

 


Jim: Who was your favorite singer when you were a boy?

Crash: I had a lot of them, Hank Williams, Faron Young, Jim Reeves, but my very favorite was Carl Smith.

Jim: So how did you get the nickname “Crash”?

Crash: A lot of people think I got it from racing cars, and where that came from was Marty Robbins introduced me one night as a “race car enthusiast”. Actually, I got it from playing football, believe it or not. I played right half back and my brother played left, and I was the smallest man on the team. So when the guard or tackle would open up a little hole, I was gone, ‘cause the other guys were so big I didn’t want to get hurt. [laughs]



 

But young Crash dreamed of making hits, not getting hit, so in 1957 he made his first professional recording at a local studio, singing the rockabilly song, “Smacky Mouth”. The following year he was picked up by Columbia records as their answer to Elvis. In 1959, Craddock, the Everly Brothers, and several other performers were booked for a concert tour of Australia. Sometime earlier, Crash had filmed a black-and-white demo of Boom Boom Baby, but unbeknownst to him, the film had made its way to Brian Henderson, popular host of the “Bandstand” program on Australian television. Said Henderson, “We played the film many times, and we were able to promote Crash Craddock so successfully that he was able to fill stadiums all over the country, and made several live appearances on “Bandstand”.

 


Crash: When I landed in Sydney, there were thousands of fans waiting, and I thought they were screaming for the Everly Brothers, but they had turned out for me because of the video that had played on Australian TV.



 

In fact, Boom Boom Baby became a number one hit down under, and Crash became a superstar in the land of Oz. Over the next two decades, Billy became the international “King of Country Rock” music, and racked up a number of hits here in America, including the sexually suggestive, Rub it In. Not long after he was inducted into the North Carolina Music Hall of Fame, Crash went to see a comedian perform at High Point Theatre, and one of the ushers recognized him.

“You know, I’ve never played here,” Billy told the usher. “Wait a minute, I want to introduce you to somebody,” said the usher, who then brought Crash together with Dave Briggs, director of the Theatre.

 


Dave: Billy told me he had never played here, so I said, “We can fix that!”



 

Briggs and Crash finally got their schedules to jive, and Craddock headlined a special show in the summer of 2016. On April 27, Crash returns to High Point Theatre for a much-awaited encore performance. On a recent visit to Triad Today, I asked Crash why he chose to remain in Greensboro, when he could have lived in so many other cities.

 


Crash: Jim, I love it here. When I go somewhere, I know how to find my way back. They asked me to move to Nashville several times, but I told them, “Look, I love my hometown. When I die, they’re going to put me in a pine box and send me back home anyway, so there’s no need to move. I’ll just stay right here.” [laughs]



 

I also asked Crash, now 79 years old, if women still throw their under garments at him on stage.

 


Crash: No. Now they throw Depends. [laughs]



 

You can listen to, and throw your underwear at, Billy “Crash” Craddock on Saturday, April 27 at 8pm, at High Point Theatre. For tickets, visit HighPointTheatre.com or call the box office, (336) 887-3001.

 
 


#MeToo Could Lead to Trump 2

Posted April 9, 2019 By Triad Today
Former vice president Joe Biden

Former vice president Joe Biden
Ever since the 2020 presidential sweepstakes began, Democratic candidates have been on a continuous apology tour. Kirsten Gillibrand has apologized for once being a conservative and voting with the NRA. Elizabeth Warren has apologized for lying about being a Native American. Amy Klobuchar has apologized for verbally abusing her staff, throwing everything at them from notebooks to tantrums. Bernie Sanders has apologized for turning a blind eye to campaign workers being sexually harassed. Beto O’Rourke has apologized for making statements that smack of misogynism. Tulsi Gabbard has apologized for supporting homophobic policies while serving in the Hawaii legislature. And now, Uncle Joe Biden, a long-time senator and two-term vice president, has had to apologize for being a space invader.

Biden’s troubles began earlier this month when former Nevada legislator Lucy Flores claimed that Joe smelled her hair and kissed the back of her head while waiting to accompany her on stage at a 2014 rally, in which she was campaigning to be the state’s lieutenant governor. Flores’ five-year delay in feeling “uncomfortable” spawned a rash of similar #MeToo complaints from other women who now say that Joe put his hands on their shoulders, or touched their arm, or pressed his nose against theirs.

Some pundits speculate that Flores is motivated by politics given the timing of her announcement, and considering that, should Biden become a candidate, his chief competition would be Bernie Sanders, a man for whom Flores worked in 2016. But video is worth a lot more than speculation, so I reviewed footage of the 2014 rally, and discovered that right after Flores and Biden emerged from the alleged hair-sniffing incident, Lucy grabbed Joe’s right hand with her left hand, and thrust them up in the air together, as if she was a boxer declaring victory in the ring. She was smiling broadly during the hand clasp. Clearly she invaded Joe’s personal hand space, but Joe didn’t complain. No reasonable person would. And yet, five years later, Joe Biden is having to explain and apologize for being Joe Biden.

Last week, iconic women’s rights activist Gloria Steinem told the Associated Press, “I think women are more than smart enough to know that Joe Biden is who he is, and hugs everybody.” Steinem is correct. Joe hugs, kisses, and touches men and women alike. He is a touchy-feely guy who is now having to re-think his way of communicating. But while Joe is re-learning 21st century etiquette (Nancy Pelosi advised him just to shake hands from now on), Steinem’s comment should also serve as a warning to women who are taking the #MeToo movement in the wrong direction. In an era when these same women complain of too much vitriol in Washington, their scolding of Joe Biden is ironic, for he is one of the few politicians who always exudes civility.

Certainly, there are valid reasons not to support Joe Biden for president, including his thumbs-up on a crime bill that filled our prisons with first-time drug users and a disproportionate number of black men. He also failed to give Anita Hill a fair hearing when she bravely accused Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment. On the flip side, Joe has been a stalwart supporter of women’s rights, he single-handedly forced Barack Obama into endorsing same-sex marriage, and he has a straight-shooter appeal that could derail Trump in the Rust Belt and Midwest. Given those assets and a wealth of government experience, it would be a shame if hair-kissing and arm-touching forced Biden to exit the presidential race before he even enters it. If that happens, then the #MeToo movement might be responsible for handing Donald Trump the keys to the Oval Office for another four years, and that’s a personal space we don’t need him in.

 
 


Child Stars Paying it Forward

Posted April 2, 2019 By Triad Today

Actors Paul Petersen, Tommy Cole and Johnny Crawford at the Annette Funicello exhibit of the Hollywood Museum in 2018

Left to right: Actors Paul Petersen, Tommy Cole and Johnny Crawford, three of the original Mousketeers, at the Annette Funicello exhibit of the Hollywood Museum in 2018


As a child actor starring in The Rifleman, Johnny Crawford had to memorize lines at a grueling pace. As an adult, he had to memorize lyrics to the songs he sang while conducting his own orchestra. Today at age 73, Johnny’s memory skills have been significantly diminished by Alzheimer’s, and the care he receives is expensive. That’s why his friend and fellow child star Paul Petersen (Jeff on The Donna Reed Show), along with members of Petersen’s support organization, “A Minor Consideration”, started a GoFundMe campaign to lessen the financial burden on Johnny and his wife Charlotte.

I first met Johnny at the 2014 Western Film Festival and have kept in touch ever since. He and Paul, however, have been friends since 1955 when they were both cast by Walt Disney to be in the original group of Mouseketeers. I spoke with Paul last week about Johnny’s condition, and about the fundraising effort.

 


Jim: When did you first know that Johnny had Alzheimer’s?

Paul: Last Summer, my wife and I, Tony Dow, Johnny and others were at the Hollywood Museum to honor Annette (Funicello), and we noticed that something was amiss with Johnny. He seemed to be a little confused, but we covered for him because that’s what you do for friends. Later when Charlotte had to put him in a facility, we knew what it was and how severe it was.

Jim: When did you start the GoFundMe campaign?

Paul: Well we had to get approval from my board of directors, and most importantly we had to get permission from Charlotte because it would be a public affair. She was grateful for the help, and frankly kind of surprised because Johnny had always been the one helping other people, and now, here was the whole bunch of former kid stars taking care of one of their own. So we started the campaign formally about five weeks ago, and it just exploded right out of the gate because people know who Johnny is. He’s like everybody’s brother because we had all watched him grow up on The Rifleman..



 

In recent years, GoFundMe pages have come to the rescue for people in special circumstances. Last Fall, for example, following complications from knee surgery, Dawn Wells, star of Gilligan’s Island, was faced with staggering medical bills. Paul and his gang of former child stars contributed to that fund, which raised over $200,000.

 


Paul: It’s rare, when you try to help someone, that all of the monies end up going to the person who needs it. GoFundMe did right by Dawn.



 

And while fundraising efforts like those for Johnny and Dawn offer financial assistance, that’s not the main focus of “A Minor Consideration”, a group that Paul and his wife Rana formed in 1991 to advocate for the rights of child actors, and offer them guidance and support as they transition into adulthood.

 


Paul: In too many instances the parents take the money (that kids make).



 

In fact, in 50% of all the troubles when it comes to high-profile kids, whether it’s sports or music, or the film business, the parents are at fault. They have not prepared the children and that’s a shame. In other cases, kids are cheated by managers and agents. In the other half of problems, chalk it up to kids who make bad decisions.

Paul knows something about the pitfalls of fame at an early age, and not long after his successful run on The Donna Reed Show, an award-winning former child star took the time to offer him support.

 


Paul: Mickey Rooney showed up at my front door, barged into my front room, took over my couch, and said, “Paul, you’ve got to get out of town, get your education, and find something else to do because they won’t let you work for 25 years.” And I said, “What the heck are you talking about, Mick? Why are you saying that?” And he said, “Because Paul, it happened to me.” Mickey paid it forward to me, and I have paid it forward by having that same kind of conversation with other prominent kids.



 

Paul’s pal Johnny Crawford has paid it forward over the years, too, and now, as fans, we can repay Johnny for the great joy he has given us over the years. To make a donation to the Johnny Crawford Alzheimer’s Fund, visit their page at www.gofundme.com. To learn more about A Minor Consideration, visit www.AMinorConsideration.org.

 
 


Budd, Walker to Appear on Triad Today

Posted March 26, 2019 By Triad Today
Triad Today logo

Jim Longworth (right) with NC congressmen Mark Walker and Ted Budd
North Carolina’s gerrymandered congressional boundaries are, to say the least, confusing. For example, if you stand in the middle of NC A&T University’s campus, you’ll have one foot in the 6th district, and the other foot in the 13th district. And while the courts and our state General Assembly may alter those boundaries by next year, and while some residents of those districts may disagree with the politics of their respective representative, the upside is that Mark Walker and Ted Budd, both Republicans, are two of the most honest, congenial, and hard-working politicians I have ever known. High praise indeed from this old liberal Independent who often disagrees with them on public policy initiatives, many of which we discussed last week when both men stopped by the studio to tape a special edition of Triad Today, which will air this Saturday at 7:30am on abc45, and Sunday at 11am on MY48. An audio edition will air on WSJS radio, Saturday at 8:30am. During the half-hour program, we covered a wide range of topics, ranging from hate speech to immigration. What follows are some highlights from our conversation.

 


Jim: When Republican congressman Steve King made racist remarks, you guys drafted a resolution condemning him, and even stripped him of his committee assignments. But when Democratic congresswoman Ilhan Omar made anti-Semitic remarks, her name was nowhere to be found on a resolution. Is that why the two of you voted against the final resolution?

Ted: It was nearly unanimous when Republicans spoke against the words of Steve King, but when it came to Omar, the Democrats came up missing. They didn’t deal with the committee assignments, they didn’t deal with the actual hate speech which she had repeated multiple times.

Mark: I was in the room when we made the decision to remove Steve King from his committees. We expected that the Democrats would offer the same decorum.

Jim: Speaking of resolutions, why not draft one that admonishes President Trump for his divisive rhetoric, which the Southern Poverty Law Center says is responsible for the historic rise in hate groups, and which the New Zealand shooter said inspired him to kill 50 Muslims?

Mark: I have no problem calling out hate and standing up for injustice anytime it happens, but I will push back a little on the Southern Poverty Law Center. Though they did great work in the beginning and should be commended for it, they list people like Ben Carson and the Family Research Council as hate groups, and I think the SPLC needs to be more responsible.

Jim: Nearly every mass shooting over the past 20 years has involved assault-style weapons and large capacity ammo clips. Do you support a ban on those weapons and clips?

Ted: Absolutely not. We have to deal with those who have terrorist intent, and those who have criminal intent. You have to deal with the people and not the device.

Mark: I’m willing to take a second look at anything that comes across our desk, but Republicans stand strong for background checks. Also, last session we worked on the “Fix/Nix” legislation which deals with the national criminal data base, to make sure there were no loopholes or gaps.

Jim: I am not a fan of President Trump, but he’s right when he says we have a border crisis. In February alone over 75,000 illegal immigrants crossed our southern border, and that number is expected to grow to one million by year’s end.

Ted: This has been a problem that is very bi-partisan. Go back to 2006, 2011, and 2013. $50 billion dollars was appropriated, and Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer were behind the “Secure Fences Act”. Now, all of a sudden when Trump is in office, they’re absolutely against him. It’s become hyper-politicized, and we need to realize this is a national security issue.

Mark: I’ve looked at these numbers, and there’s been a 572% increase in illegal immigration since the last administration, and now it’s a humanitarian issue because we’re seeing immigrant children being abused. Even Doctors Without Borders will tell you that one out of three of these young girls are being assaulted, and one out of six young men.

Jim: How are things different now that you’re no longer in the majority?

Mark: It’s a little different place, but you know what? It’s a privilege and an honor to serve the people of North Carolina, and we’re still learning. I’m happy to have the opportunity, and we hope to do the very best job we can.



 
 


Nooses, Swastikas, and Words Matter

Posted March 19, 2019 By Triad Today
Pro-Trump graffiti of a swastika

Pro-Trump graffiti of a swastika
A noose was found hanging at a Boeing factory in North Charleston. A New York City youth was arrested for drawing Nazi swastikas on the school playground. A White Nationalist Coast Guardsman was arrested just before he was able to carry out a mass terrorist attack, and another White Nationalist murdered 49 Islamic worshippers inside a New Zealand mosque. All this, and we’re not even three months into 2019. And, if a new report from the Southern Poverty Law Center is any indication, the next nine months could be just as bad.

Last month the SPLC issued its annual “Year in Hate and Extremism” report, in which the number of hate groups in the United States (now estimated at 1,020) is said to be at a 20-year high. Heidi Beirich, director of the civil rights organization, blames the sharp rise on divisive, hate-filled rhetoric and policies from Donald Trump. In a statement released to the media, Beirich said, “The numbers tell a striking story – that this president is not simply a polarizing figure, but a radicalizing one.”

But where does polarizing end and radicalizing begin? On the campaign trail Trump suggested that NRA members with guns could take care of Hillary. He also referred to Mexicans as murderers and rapists. Later, as president, he sought to ban all Muslims from entering the United States, and told his supporters that “Islam hates us.” And, just two days before the New Zealand massacre, Trump told Breitbart News that liberals who disagree with his political agenda better watch out. Said Trump, “I have the support of the police, the support of the military, the support of Bikers for Trump. I have the tough people, but they don’t play it tough until they [liberals] go to a certain point, and then it would be very bad, very bad.”

Let’s be clear. Donald Trump has never told anyone to draw swastikas or hang nooses, nor has he ordered anyone to go out and massacre a church full of innocent people. On the other hand, if Beirich’s conclusion is accurate, then the President bears some responsibility when unstable individuals heed his words, and then act upon them. For example, in his nearly 80-page manifesto, Brenton Tarrant, the man charged with the New Zealand massacre, cited Trump’s rhetoric as an inspiration for his attack on Muslims. Still, after news of the attack reached Mr. Trump, he denied that White Nationalism is a rising threat. “I think it’s a small group of people who have very serious problems,” said the President. First, White Nationalists are not a small group of people, and second, if you think they have problems, then why throw fuel on the fire with hateful tweets and speeches? Why not allocate government resources to prevent and combat the growing threat of terrorism by White Nationalists? Why defend some of the Nazis at Charlottesville as “fine people?” The answers to those questions may lead us to conclude that Trump is a racist, but more probably he is just afraid of losing his mostly white base.

In the musical South Pacific, there is a song whose lyrics include a possible explanation for how someone comes to identify as a White Nationalist.


You’ve got to be taught to hate and fear.

You’ve got to be taught from year to year.

It’s got to be drummed in your dear little ear.

You’ve got to be carefully taught.

The implication is that children learn to hate from their parents, but as those children grow older, they can also learn to hate from the words of influential public figures.

During the 2008 presidential campaign between Barack Obama and John McCain, private citizen Trump kept claiming that Obama was born in Kenya. Later, a woman who had bought into Trump’s racist rhetoric stood up at a McCain town hall, and said, “I can’t trust Obama. […] He’s an Arab.” McCain could have nodded or smiled in tacit agreement. He could have worked the crowd up into a frenzied chant of “Send him back! Send him back!” Instead, McCain took the microphone from the woman and said, “No ma’am. He’s a decent family man and citizen that I just happen to have disagreements with.”

That’s how a real leader is supposed to sound. That’s how a real leader uses words to stand up to his base in order to defuse and denounce hate speech. That’s how a real leader inspires us to do our best, instead of inspiring others to do their worst.

 
 


Yes, the Border Crisis is Real

Posted March 12, 2019 By Triad Today

Children look through the wall on the US-Mexico border
Lord knows I am not a fan of Donald Trump. Over the past two years I have written about the President’s amoral character, his proclivity for telling lies (over 8,000 of them since taking office), about his mean-spirited, un-presidential tweets and speeches, about his refusal to read briefing papers or accept input from his own intelligence agencies, and about his treatment of women. I’ve even referenced findings from two dozen psychologists who say the man has a clinical mental illness, and is unfit for office. But, as the old saying goes, even a stopped clock is right twice a day. Translation? Trump might be an incompetent, misogynistic, lying man-child, but he’s right about one thing: we have a crisis at our southern border. According to the New York Times (also not a fan of Trump’s), over 76,000 illegal immigrants crossed the Mexican border in February alone, and that number is expected to grow to over one million by year’s end.

At first, Trump’s critics in Congress and the media balked at his border wall project, saying that southern border crossings were at an all-time low. But when the statistics proved otherwise, the naysayers tried a different tactic. They ignored the onslaught of illegals, and focused instead on lamenting over the immigrant children who might have been separated from their parents. Such outrage plays well to the cameras, but the problem is that criticism of Trump’s zero-tolerance policy has been exaggerated and coverage of that policy has been misleading.

Let’s go back to June of last year when CNN claimed that thousands of children had been separated from their parents after crossing the Mexican border illegally. Yet Townhall.com found that 83% of the people who crossed illegally were “unaccompanied minors”. The other 17% included children who came here with an adult who may not have been their parent. Of those, some were separated from their parent only if that parent had been arrested and held to await trial. Meanwhile CNN’s John Berman and other anchors told viewers that babies were being stripped away from their mothers. But CNN’s own field reporter, Diann Gallager witnessed infants being cared for by adults who had been verified as the moms and dads. Another blow to CNN’s credibility came when Gallager and her counterparts covering the other detention centers, reported that less than 7% of the children had actually been separated from someone they said was their parent. Of those, all were housed in dormitory settings where kids received six hours of schooling every day, along with daily group counseling and weekly individual counseling. Illegal immigrant children also met daily with their case worker who assisted them in re-uniting with their parent, or temporarily placing them in a loving home. In the interim, the kids were well clothed, well fed, and safe from abuse and human traffickers.

Last week, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen testified before Congress about the unprecedented numbers of immigrants crossing over our southern border. Said Nielsen, “Make no mistake, this chain of human misery is getting worse.” Meanwhile, Border Protection Commissioner Kevin McAleeman called a press conference to report that, “The system is well beyond capacity, and remains at the breaking point.”

Don’t get me wrong. If only one child has been separated from his mother, it is one too many, but until such time as they can be re-united, then those children are being cared for and protected in ways that their parents couldn’t provide back in their own homeland. The bigger problem now is how to stop the invasion of illegal immigrants into the United States, and work with our Central American neighbors to stamp out human trafficking while creating economic opportunities for those seeking a better life.

There are scores of things to criticize Donald Trump for, but his wanting more resources to protect our southern border should not be one of them. We ARE in crisis, and Congress needs to step away from the cameras, hold their collective noses, and work with Trump to solve the problem.

 
 


Wonder Women of Triad Today

Posted March 5, 2019 By Triad Today
Female super hero in a mask

Female super hero in a mask
A couple of weeks ago, YESWeekly editor Katie Murawski told me that this issue was going to salute Wonder Women of the Triad, and asked if I would participate.

Immediately my thoughts turned to the first two Wonder Women I ever met, both from the Triad. The first was Dr. Mary Griffith. In the 1940s and ’50s, Dr. Griffith supervised medical students, and was one of the first women named to the Wake Forest Baptist Hospital medical school faculty. She also brought me into the world, with help, of course, from the very next Wonder Woman I met—my Mom, Charlotte. One of them spanked me once, and the other one spanked me as needed. Mom had been a stand-out basketball player at the old Gray High School in Winston-Salem, and had a talent for creative writing. After marrying my Dad, she became a tireless volunteer for the Cancer Society, a long-time proof reader for Hunter Publishing, and, most importantly, the world’s greatest Mom. Unfortunately, Mom and Dr. Griffith are no longer with us, and I knew that Katie wanted me to write about women who are still actively working wonders in the Triad, so I decided to recognize just a few of the many thousands of ladies who have appeared on my Triad Today television program.

DD Adams has served on Winston-Salem City Council since 2009. She led the effort to raise pay for police, firefighters, and city employees, and in 2018, DD ran for Congress against incumbent Virginia Foxx. She lost that fight, but continues to fight for the rights of all people.

Karen Barnes is executive director of Venture Café, a venue for people to network with and be inspired by fellow innovators and entrepreneurs. In less than two years, VC’s Thursday night gatherings have attracted over 12,000 participants.

Avery Crump is the newly elected District Attorney for Guilford County. She is also the first woman D.A. and first person of color to hold that position. A former judge, Avery told me she gave up her black robes for a chance to prosecute criminals and perhaps help shape new laws in the process.

Eunice Dudley is co-founder of Dudley Beauty Products and Beauty School System. She and her husband Joe Dudley, Sr. went from selling Fuller brush products to creating a global presence in the beauty products industry. Eunice is dedicated to community service and sits on a number of local boards.

Ursula Dudley Oglesby is the daughter of Joe and Eunice Dudley, and she became President of Dudley Beauty Corp. in 2008. Ursula began working for her parents at age 7, went on to earn a law degree, then returned to the family business. Under her leadership, the company has expanded from 57 to over 300 products.

Margaret Elliott has been at the helm of Crisis Control Ministries for 20 years and during that time has met the emergency needs of countless thousands of individuals and families, while helping them to become self sufficient.

Sylvia Sprinkle Hamlin is executive director of both the N.C. Black Repertory Company, and the biennial National Black Theatre Festival. In 2000 she also became the first woman to lead the Forsyth County Public Library system.

Dr. Tina Merhoff, founder of Tina S. Merhoff & Associates Pediatric Dentistry, doesn’t just talk the talk, she walks the walk. A dedicated advocate for children’s health, Tina holds an annual “Make a Kid Smile” event where she and her staff offer free dental care and procedures to children whose family couldn’t otherwise afford it.

Kim Record is the Athletic Director at UNCG who, last year alone, presided over five conference championships. She is responsible for overseeing 17 athletic programs, and in 2017, 169 of her student athletes made the Southern Conference honor roll.

Kimberly Roberts is Vice President of marketing and brand management for Crumley Roberts attorneys at law. Her passion is empowering women of all ages and educating families about child safety. Through the Roberts Center and her own Red Affect Boutique, Kim is able to fund and award college scholarships for students who are beginning their life journey, and women who are re-launching theirs.

Of course, no list of Wonder Women would be complete without a nod to my beautiful wife Pam Cook, who, in addition to running her own public relations firm, manages to find time to assist me with Triad Today, and keep me grounded. Not a day goes by that she doesn’t look at me and say, “Jim, there’s something really wrong with you.” Spoken like a true Wonder Woman.

 
 


A Casino in Danville is No Gamble

Posted February 26, 2019 By Triad Today
Danville River Mills, in better times

Danville River Mills, yesterday and today
In 1993, Ross Perot warned that within ten years, NAFTA would suck jobs out of America and spur a wave of plant closings. Turns out he was right. The Economic Policy Institute reported that, as of 2007, NAFTA had cost one million Americans their jobs. As if that wasn’t bad enough, greedy big banks and insurance companies were busy creating an historic home loan crisis that led to a near depression in 2008. The combination and convergence of those two disasters had a devastating effect on cities whose economy depended upon textile, automotive, and furniture plants. Danville, Virginia was particularly hard hit, with the closure of Dan River Mill, loss of tobacco jobs, and a decline in rail traffic. Now, Danville has an opportunity to bounce back big time.

Last year, Danville (along with economically depressed Bristol) commissioned a study by the Chmura Group which concluded that a casino resort would create nearly 7,000 new jobs, and net over $20 million dollars in annual tax revenues for the city, whose vice mayor, Lee Vogler told me, “Unprecedented jobs and revenues would be created. It’s the biggest economic development opportunity in my lifetime.” Buoyed by that study, Danville City Council planned to hold a local referendum this fall in which voters could greenlight a casino project. Unfortunately, lawmakers in Richmond slammed on the brakes, ruling that the General Assembly must first conduct an impact study before it can give permission to hold a referendum. That means it will be sometime in 2020 before a vote is taken.

Given the findings of the Chmura Group, a company who the General Assembly itself has relied upon in the past, I asked Vogler why another study was warranted. “I’m not sure about the logic of that,” he said. “Perhaps they want to know if there would be any negative impact on statewide economic development, but our local economic development office has found no negative impact. In fact, 40 other states have test cases, so there’s plenty of data available. I didn’t see any reason to delay.

Vogler admits that state legislators need time to meet and decide how casinos would be regulated and by who, but those kinds of procedural matters need not keep local voters from approving a casino project in principal. I smelled a rat, and asked the Vice Mayor why any elected official in their right mind would oppose or delay something that could benefit so many people in depressed cities.

“Some legislators don’t want casinos in their part of the state, like Northern Virginia which is flush with cash. They don’t understand the needs of areas like Danville and Bristol, and what the casino would mean to us. Right now we have $150 million dollars in capital improvement needs for our schools, and the tax revenues from a casino would help us build and improve schools.”

But an insensitivity to the economic needs of Danville isn’t the only reason that some legislators put up road blocks for a casino.

“There has been some opposition from people who say gambling is against their religious beliefs, which I respect. But when I ask them if they have ever bought a lottery ticket, or a church raffle ticket, they say, ‘Yes’. I tell them that’s gambling. They respond by saying, ‘Yes, but lottery sales and raffle proceeds go for a good cause,’ and I tell them, so will casino revenues.”

Vogler also suspects that some folks think a casino will bring organized crime to Danville, but there is no evidence to support that myth. Moreover, the American Gaming Association polled law enforcement officers who actually work around casinos, and they reported that crime has not increased on their beat.

For now, Vogler and his counterparts in Bristol and Portsmouth hope to educate state lawmakers about the benefits of casinos, and move the timeline up for a local vote. “I want to get it in front of our citizens. If this goes to a referendum, it will pass. I think the casino is coming sooner or later, said Vogler.”

Casinos almost always make money, thus the phrase, “Never bet against the house”. But the odds have been stacked against the folks of Danville for a long time, and a casino may be the only way for their luck to change.

 
 


Who Will Break the Glass Ceiling?

Posted February 19, 2019 By Triad Today
Senator Kamala Harris

six women candidates for the 2020 US presidential election

Left to right, top row: Representative Gabbard, Senator Gillibrand, Senator Harris
Left to right, bottom row: Senator Klobuchar, Senator Warren, Ms. Williamson


Victoria Woodhull tried to do it. So did Belva Lockwood and many others. In fact, 34 women have run for president, representing a total of 17 different political parties, and while all of them tried, none were able to break the glass ceiling that has kept women out of the Oval Office for the past 230 years. All that may change next year. For one thing, the #MeToo movement has given a new momentum to the six women who have already declared for the 2020 race. Of course, there have been other movements in other eras, and this is not the first time we’ve had multiple women vie for the top spot in the same election cycle. It happened in 1972 when Shirley Chisholm, Bella Abzug, and three other women threw their hats in the ring. Five more women ran in 1992, and in 1996, eleven women tried to unseat Bill Clinton. And so, while the ladies who have announced this year are not breaking new ground, they may have the best chance to finally break that pesky old glass ceiling once and for all.

Thus far, six Democratic women have announced their intention to win their party’s nomination and send Donald Trump back to his tower. They are Hawaii congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, New York senator Kirsten Gillibrand, California senator Kamala Harris, Minnesota senator Amy Klobuchar, Massachusetts senator Elizabeth Warren, and Marianne Williamson, who is a spiritual adviser to Oprah Winfrey.

Tulsi Gabbard, 37, is a political anomaly. For one thing, she’s a Democrat who supported Bernie Sanders in 2016. And, when it became clear that the DNC was stacking the deck in Hillary’s favor, she resigned her post as Vice Chair. She’s also a nouveau liberal who now believes in equal rights, but she’s had to apologize for her earlier anti-gay rhetoric and associations while serving in the Hawaii State House. After pulling a tour of duty in Iraq and Kuwait, she was elected to Congress, where she has since modified her more conservative positions.

Kirsten Gillibrand, 52, is the ultimate flip-flopper. While representing a mostly rural district in Congress, she was a conservative Democrat who was easy on guns (she once received an “A” rating from the NRA) and tough on immigration. But once she was appointed to fill out Hillary’s term in the Senate, Gillibrand recanted her old positions, including calling for the abolishment of ICE. She also positioned herself as a faux leader of the #MeToo movement by calling for fellow Democratic senator Al Franken to resign for having engaged in a couple of minor, non-sexual groping incidents. Her grandstanding probably cost the Dems control of the Senate.

Kamala Harris, 54, is a former prosecutor and California attorney general who was elected to the Senate in 2016. Last year she gained national attention for grilling Judge Brett Kavanaugh during his Supreme Court confirmation hearings. Despite supporting “Medicare for All” and other liberal policies, she has come under fire from some Democrats for her conservative prosecutorial record. As the child of a mixed-race marriage, Harris would become not only the nation’s first woman president, but also the first of both Asian- and African-American heritage.

Amy Klobuchar, 58, is a former prosecutor, and now a moderate Democratic senator from Minnesota who believes she can capture the rust-belt vote that eluded Hillary in 2016. She wants to overturn Citizens United, and supports legislation that would automatically register young people to vote when they turn 18. Klobuchar has one of the highest rates of staff turnover in the Senate, a fact that has given credence to recent charges of her being verbally abusive to her employees.

Elizabeth Warren, 69, came to national prominence as an advocate for consumers who had been screwed over by banks and insurance companies during the last recession. President Obama put her considerable expertise to work by naming Warren as special adviser to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Her political positions are closely aligned with those of Bernie Sanders, including “Medicare for All” and free college education. Recently she has had to apologize for falsely claiming to be a Native American when applying to the Bar Association.

Marianne Williamson, 66, is a Los Angeles-based author, teacher, and spiritual adviser to celebrities such as Oprah Winfrey, Katy Perry, and Kim Kardashian. She wants African Americans to receive $100 billion dollars in reparations for slavery, with monies going for economic renewal. One of her slogans is, “We need to wage peace”. Another is, “Love should be our bottom line”.

There are those who believe that some of these women are only trying to raise their profile in hopes of being the VP pick if Joe Biden gets in the race. That may be true, but If he doesn’t run, my money is on Ms. Harris to get the nomination, and give Trump a run for his money. I can hear the glass starting to break already.

 
 


Blackface Saga Gives Virginia a Black Eye

Posted February 12, 2019 By Triad Today
photo from Virginia Governor Ralph Northam's 1984 yearbook page

photo from Virginia Governor Ralph Northam's 1984 yearbook page
If you’re not from Virginia, or haven’t lived in the Old Dominion for any significant amount of time, then you’re probably wondering how a Democrat governor of that state could have once donned blackface and not understand the ramifications at the time, or even decades later. I’ll offer some possible explanations in a moment, but first, a bit of background.

In 1984, a 25-year-old Dr. Ralph Northam submitted a number of photos to be included on his personal page in the Eastern Virginia Medical School yearbook. Among those photos was a man in blackface and another man standing beside him wearing a KKK hood and robe. Earlier this month, following Governor Northam’s support for a bill that would ease restrictions on late-term abortions, the conservative website, BigLeague.com released the 34-year-old racist photo, and suddenly Virginia’s chief executive found himself embroiled in the worst political scandal since Chuck Robb confessed to receiving an extra-marital massage.

Soon after the Washington Post confirmed the authenticity of BigLeague.com’s find, Northam issued a written apology for appearing in the Jim Crow photo. But the next day, the Governor called a press conference to say that he wasn’t in the photo, and didn’t know how it even got on his yearbook page. No one was buying Ralph’s reversal, especially when it was revealed that his nickname at VMI was “coon man”. But things got worse when he admitted to having donned blackface while imitating Michael Jackson for a 1984 dance competition.

Following that racially tone-deaf press conference, elected officials from both parties were calling for Northam to resign, including Virginia’s white, Democrat Attorney General Mark Herring. But several days later, in a clear case of the pot calling the kettle black, Herring admitted that he too had once appeared in blackface while pretending to be a rap star. All this comes on the heels of Congressman Steve King’s defense of white nationalism, the violence in Charlottesville, and rallies to tear down Confederate monuments, including at least three of which were located here in North Carolina.

So why the burgeoning blackface epidemic among Virginia politicians? Perhaps William Elwood’s statement to WHSV-TV says it best. Elwood, who was the page designer for Northam’s medical school yearbook, said that the 1984 edition featured a number of similarly racist photos, but, “nobody thought of that as a significant problem back then.”

Back “THEN?”

We’re talking about 1984, not 1884. We’re talking about a time when the Rev. Jesse Jackson was making his first pzresidential run, and Doug Wilder was starting on his path to become Virginia’s first African-American to be elected lieutenant governor, then governor.

Northam and Herring are not stupid people, and they probably aren’t racists.

But they are, at the very least, insensitive to the feelings of people who don’t look like them. It’s an insensitivity that is borne out of centuries of racial prejudice, beginning with white slave traders in Jamestown 400 years ago, and continuing onto the Civil War, during which time, Richmond served as the capital of the Confederacy. This systematic insensitivity was memorialized in the early 20th century when a series of statues of Confederate generals was erected along Monument Avenue, then dredged up in 1996 when whites fought against putting a statue of Arthur Ashe on that same street. Back then Wayne Byrd, president of the Heritage Preservation Association said the Ashe statue didn’t belong on Monument Avenue because it is “hallowed ground.”

To be fair, Northam and Herring are also products of our society’s historically mixed messages when it comes to race. After all, both white and black performers appeared in blackface during 19th-century minstrel shows. In the 1930s, ‘40s, and ‘50s, a number of A-list, non-bigoted film stars like Fred Astaire and Judy Garland sang and danced in blackface. In 1976, Richard Pryor applied shoe polish to Gene Wilder in Silver Streak, and in 1993 Whoopi Goldberg, herself a social activist, had no problem when her boyfriend Ted Danson dressed in blackface during a Friar’s Roast in her honor. Spike Lee did the deed in 2000’s Bamboozled, and in 2008, Robert Downey, Jr. drew high praise from black celebrities when he donned blackface in the film Tropic Thunder. But mixed messages or not, Virginia’s governor and attorney general shouldn’t have been unprepared for the visceral reaction to their decades-old indiscretions, especially after media darling Megyn Kelley was fired last year by NBC for having appeared in blackface. What’s changed in Virginia and throughout the nation is that we are now in an era of zero tolerance when it comes to racist behavior by public figures.

It remains to be seen whether Northam and Herring will resign, or if other elected officials will start coming forward with their racially-charged past indiscretions. Time will tell. Meanwhile, if you come across a white guy who admits to having worn blackface, feel free to call him the “N” word: “Nitwit”.