Commentaries Archive


Crumley Roberts Committed to Culture of Wellness

Posted September 16, 2015 By Triad Today
Crumley Roberts logo

Crumley Roberts Logo
During their first 25 years in business, Crumley Roberts has stood up for thousands of people who were injured through no fault of their own. As such, Crumley Roberts attorneys often help clients who have been involved in accidents which they could not possibly have prevented. But as the law firm begins its second quarter century of service, it also wants to focus on protecting people from things that CAN be prevented. That’s why Crumley Roberts CEO Chris Roberts and his wife Kimberly, the firm’s Vice President of Cultural Development, have committed themselves to a culture of wellness, both within the company, and throughout the communities they serve in North and South Carolina. In 2013, for example, they established “C.R.E.W.”, the Crumley Roberts Employee Wellness program.

Appearing on Triad Today, Kimberly Roberts told me, “The purpose of the program is to assist our employees in achieving balance in their lives to whatever level they choose to participate. There’s a focus on physical, spiritual, emotional, environmental, and occupational health. We have nearly 200 employees, and to date, we have over 97% participation in the program.”

And those numbers aren’t surprising because “C.R.E.W.” offers a variety of services and activities, including a subsidized smoking cessation program, a flu shot clinic for staff and their families, and regular lunch and learn events. Crumley Roberts also pays half the cost of an in-house Weight Watchers program.

“The wellness initiatives at Crumley Roberts have empowered me to finally pursue a healthier lifestyle, and as the program has continued to evolve, I have seen my personal health and wellness continue to improve to a level that I never dreamed I could attain,” said Crumley Roberts staffer Donna Gardner.

But Crumley Roberts’ commitment to a culture of wellness extends far beyond their employees. For example, Kimberly has spearheaded the law firm’s involvement with “Go Red for Women”, and, this year, Crumley Roberts became a major sponsor of the American Heart Association’s “Life is Why” campaign.

“Heart disease is the leading cause of death among women, but fortunately it is 80% preventable. That’s why Crumley Roberts is helping the American Heart Association educate women about making healthier lifestyle choices,” said Ms. Roberts.

In particular, Crumley Roberts is working with the American Heart Association to make all adults more aware of the seven major risk factors for heart disease and stroke, those being: smoking, weight management, cholesterol, high blood pressure, blood glucose, nutrition, and physical activity. The law firm also supports a number of initiatives to keep young people healthy, including efforts to reduce childhood obesity, and activities like bike safety rodeos that promote safe ways to exercise.

“We are thrilled to have such an incredible partner who realizes that prevention of heart disease goes well beyond the walls of their employee wellness program, but also sees how they can impact the entire community,” said Ruth Heyd, executive director of the American Heart Association in Guilford County. “Working with the Roberts family and their team is inspiring. They are trailblazers in this community for their substantial support, and we are blessed to have them involved with our local heart association.”

And Crumley Roberts’ involvement in promoting a culture of wellness continues to grow as the firm grows. “Our advertising slogan is ‘We Stand Up for You’, but it’s much more than just a slogan,” said Chris Roberts. “We only hire attorneys and staff who care about the community, and we’re all standing up for anyone and everyone who can benefit from adopting a healthier lifestyle.

Hopefully, that means saving lives in the process.”

For more information on heart disease, visit www.heart.org. To learn more about Crumley Roberts’ wellness initiatives, visit www.crumleyroberts.com.


Neill McNeill: Dean of Triad Anchors

Posted September 9, 2015 By Triad Today
TV personality Neill McNeill

Neill McNeill of Fox 8 WGHP
During my forty years in broadcasting I’ve known anchormen to say that TV is in their blood, but Neill McNeill is the first one to tell me TV was in his baby formula. More on that later.

Neill McNeill, a native of Raeford, had an interest in radio and television from an early age. While attending UNC Chapel Hill he reported and anchored at WKFT in Fayetteville, then upon graduation, he landed a full time job with WGHP-TV. After filling in on the morning and noon news programs, Neill became the regular anchor of various weekend and weeknight newscasts before succeeding long time evening anchor Fred Blackman, who retired in 2001. Today, 32 years later, Neil co-anchors four newscasts each day, reports and produces the “Newsmakers” series, and writes or edits many of the stories he reads on-air.

Neill McNeill on set with co-anchor Katie Nordeen

Because of his longevity, Neill is perhaps the most popular television personality in the Triad, but he is also well liked and respected by his colleagues and management. “Neill is an extremely knowledgeable journalist and an overall great guy,” said his co-anchor Katie Nordeen. “He’s been a mentor to me over the past two and a half years and I’m lucky to call him a friend.” WGHP General Manager Jim Himes added, “Neill is a skilled and seasoned journalist who really knows the Triad. His stories give perspective and have great depth. It is wonderful to have such a leader inside our newsroom to help coach and teach. We look forward to another 32 years!”

Neill and I spoke by phone late last month.

 


 

JL: What did your parents do for a living?

NM: Dad worked in the planning department at Burlington industries, which was the largest employer in Raeford. My mom was a public school music teacher. She also directed the choral groups, taught music theory, and music appreciation. I sang in all of her choral groups. She was a big inspiration for me. She got me in front of people doing narration parts, and that helped me develop an interest in performing in front of people and telling stories.

JL: When did you catch the news bug?

NM: Probably in junior high. Every night at 5:30 we’d eat dinner while watching Andy Griffith, then we’d all move into the den at 6 o’clock and watch Charlie Gaddy on WRAL News and Rich Brenner doing sports. One of the reasons we watched Charlie religiously is because my mom and dad listened to him on WPTF radio. In fact, Mom claims to this day that she used to feed me my bottle and listen to Charlie Gaddy in the morning.

JL: Who specifically influenced you to go into broadcasting as a career?

NM: It was a minister in the Presbyterian church I grew up in. His name is John Ropp. Neill McNeill with Fox 8's sports anchor Rich BrennerI remember listening to his radio sermons on Sunday mornings. What a great voice he had,and what an effective minister he was. He would share stories with our youth group about how much fun radio was. But again, growing up watching Charlie Gaddy and Rich Brenner was a big influence. I don’t even know how to describe being able to work beside Rich for 26 years. He’s a guy I grew up watching ,and he would later become one of my best friends.

JL: Neill McNeill is such a great name for TV. Is that your real name?

NM: It is my real name. I was named after my father and he was named after a great uncle. Whether it’s a good name for TV is a matter of opinion. When I first applied at WITN in Washington, North Carolina right after I got out of school, the news director said to me, “Have you ever thought of changing your name?” Later on a news consultant asked me the same thing. So if I had it to do over again, I’d probably use my middle name which is Adams, and I’d go by Neill Adams. But I was always worried about what my family would think if I changed my name. Once I asked my mom, “What if I had called myself Neill Adams?”, and she said, “I would have been cool with that” (laughs).

JL: How has local TV news changed over the past 32 years?

NM: Technology has been the biggest change. We now have these portable units that can send high definition video and audio back to the station from the field, and you don’t need a live truck. I wish we had those twenty years ago.

JL: What’s the most difficult story you ever reported?

NM: That was when I got the first interview with Phil Bradshaw, who was the husband of Sandy Bradshaw who died in the plane crash in Pennsylvania on 9/11. That affected me emotionally because here’s a guy my age who had two young children, and all of a sudden his wife was just gone.

JL: What’s the most rewarding thing about being a news anchor in the Triad?

NM: Being able to tell good stories and helping to change people’s lives for the better.

JL: Have you ever been confused with another local TV personality?

NM: Yeah, WXII’s Cameron Kent a couple of times, and Cameron will tell you he’s been confused with me too. I also get confused with our morning anchor Brad Jones. People will say to me, “Hey Neill we enjoy watching you in the morning!”

JL: What was the most embarrassing thing you ever did on air?

NM: The most embarrassing thing I’ve ever done on air wasn’t on WGHP, it was on WFMY. Early on in my career we were doing a live shot at the airport and so was WFMY. We had just finished our live shot and I thought Channel 2 had finished theirs as well. So I walked over to their camera and waved into the lens.

At that moment, WFMY went live from that camera to go into a commercial break. My news director had a talk with me later and said, “Try and stay off the other station” (laughs).

JL: What would you have been if you hadn’t gone into TV news?

NM: Probably a lawyer. I think a lot of the same skills apply. I’ve also thought sometimes about the ministry. I would enjoy the speaking part of being a minister, but I don’t know if I would be very good at the pastoring part.

JL: 32 years from now, when you’re still anchoring the news in the year 2047, what would you like for your lead story to be?

NM: I’d like to say, “We’ve found a cure for cancer, we’ve cut childhood abuse numbers tremendously, and we’ve gone three years without a mass shooting.”

I hope I’m around for that broadcast. In the meantime, if you see Neill on the street, please don’t call him Cameron or Brad. And for God’s sake, don’t let him get near WFMY’s camera.


Gun Deaths Buoyed by Obstacles

Posted September 2, 2015 By Triad Today
Handgun and TV camera

A handgun and a video camera
As sometimes happens, two ironic or eerily connected stories occupy news headlines on the same day. Such was the case last Wednesday when James Holmes was officially sentenced for murdering twelve people and wounding 70 others at an Aurora, Colorado movie theatre in 2012.

Holmes was given 12 life sentences, plus another 3,318 years without parole. Meanwhile, as closure came for one massacre, another was unfolding 1,300 miles away. WDBJ-TV reporter Alison Parker and photojournalist Adam Ward were conducting a live interview on location in Moneta, Virginia when they were gunned down by their former colleague Vester Flanagan.

Flanagan (aka, Bryce Williams) was fired from WDBJ two years ago after he demonstrated behavioral problems, including repeated incidents of aggression toward fellow employees. His was a pattern of disturbing behavior, dating back to his last two television jobs in San Diego and Tallahassee, where he got into physical altercations with staff. According to a “manifesto” he faxed to ABC News immediately after shooting Parker and Ward, Flanagan indicated that he had been bullied, and was the victim of racism at WDBJ. But, in fact, that harassment never took place, except inside Flanagan’s sick mind. Nevertheless, he took out his wrath on Parker and Ward by discharging seventeen point-blank rounds at them from his .40 caliber Glock handgun. They died instantly. Flanagan later took his own life.

In the aftermath of the WDBJ shooting, Ms. Parker’s father vowed to fight for gun control. Good luck with that. Congress is noted for its inaction when it comes to handgun reform. They failed to act after Columbine, Fort Hood, Virginia Tech, Charleston, and even after one of their own members was shot. And for all the blame that Republicans receive for hiding behind the Second Amendment, let’s not forget that following the Newtown massacre, President Obama’s Democrat-controlled Senate refused to enact his gun control legislation.

Not long ago I asked Governor Pat McCrory if he favored stricter gun laws, such as increasing the age for purchasing a handgun, requiring that the applicant be gainfully employed, and extending the wait time to allow for more thorough background checks. McCrory told me that we did not need new laws so long as local sheriffs continued to be responsible for background checks. He has a legitimate point. For example, a federal background check will red flag someone who has been convicted of a previous crime. But a county sheriff can deny a gun purchase if he simply thinks an applicant is not of good moral character, even if that person has never been convicted of anything. Who knows, perhaps if sheriffs in Virginia, California, and Florida had had more shared information available, and more latitude with investigations of moral character, Vester Flanagan’s history of workplace aggression might have kept him from purchasing the Glock that killed Parker and Ward.

On the other hand, there are enough guns in circulation now that Flanagan might have obtained one without going through a legitimate dealer anyway. Just look at the statistics. As of 2010, the population of the United States was 306 million, but according to the Congressional Research Service, there are 310 million firearms in America. Those astounding numbers make it easy to believe the CDC who says that over 11,000 people are murdered by a handgun each year, and another 21,000 commit suicide with a handgun. Last week’s tragic incident in Virginia is an example of both categories. But Flanagan’s murder/suicide act is not just a by-product of guns. It is first and foremost a by-product of mental illness.

So why then did WDBJ hire Flanagan in the first place if he had a history of behavioral problems? Former WDBJ News Director Dan Dennison released a statement saying that “the station had no idea of his (Flanagan’s) shortcomings.” Seems plausible given the nature of the TV business. In other words, had one of Flanagan’s former employers blackballed him to Dennison, he or she would have been open to a lawsuit. Ok, but why didn’t WDBJ just fire Flanagan at the first sign of trouble? Once again you can thank the legal system for that obstacle. In the corporate world, there are strict guidelines an employer must follow before discharging an employee, or else risk being dragged into court on civil rights violations. A TV station manager can’t even force a troubled worker to undergo psychological treatment as a condition of continued employment. Such treatment can only be suggested. In other words, the laws that are in place to protect the rights of sane people, also keep us from dealing expeditiously with insane people.

Last week, Mental Health America issued a statement, saying that “there is currently solid, bipartisan support in both chambers of Congress to address our mental health system…Now is the time to erase the discrimination and stigma surrounding mental illness…and to intervene effectively to save lives…” It’s a nice sentiment, but, given Congress’ track record, I won’t hold my breath for reform of any kind until I see it enacted.

For now, America is a victim of its own unwillingness to develop effective gun laws and comprehensive mental health services, and its propensity for creating legal obstacles that tie our hands when it comes to early intervention. It’s no wonder, then, that we lead the world in homicides and prison populations. Let’s face it, we’re mainly good at two things: killing and sentencing. We need to get better at preventing.


Remembering Dick Van Patten

Posted August 26, 2015 By Triad Today
Dick Van Patten (photo by Phil Konstantin. Licensed under Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0)

Dick Van Patten with Jim Longworth in June, 2009
In his book, Eighty is Not Enough, Dick Van Patten described the role he played in the film Westworld, as “bumbling.” Fact is, Dick often portrayed characters who were meek, non-confrontational, indecisive, easily intimidated, and yes, bumbling. But in real life, Dick Van Patten was anything but those things. He was opinionated, passionate, compassionate, had a great sense of humor, loved women, loved kids, loved sports, and could hold his own with just about anyone on the tennis courts or at a poker table. The one thing common to both his on screen and off screen personas, though, was his trademark smile. It was genuine and infectious, and I will miss it. Dick died on June 23 from complications of diabetes. He was 86.

I first met Dick in 2009 when I produced and moderated A Salute to TV Dads for the Television Academy. Dick was one of nine iconic TV Dads I brought together for a lively and comical discussion of their lives and careers. The panel included such luminaries as Dick Van Dyke, Bryan Cranston, Bill Paxton, Patrick Duffy, and Jon Cryer (Video clips from the event can be viewed on my website JimLongworth.com). Dick and I talked on several occasions prior to that Father’s Day gathering, and I called him on his birthday in the years afterwards. Of course it was always difficult to catch Dick at home because he was either working, playing tennis, or spending time at the track. He also managed to compile a trivia book, and pen an autobiography.

Dick was not just busy, he was relevant to audiences across nine decades. He performed in over 600 radio programs, 27 Broadway plays, 24 feature films, and scores of television series, including starring in seven. But before he discovered acting, young Dick’s passion was animals. I asked him about that at our TV Dads event.

JL: I read somewhere that your dad used to take you to the pet store every weekend when you were a kid.

DVP: Yeah, I wanted to have my own pet shop when I was a kid. My father would take me every Saturday and I would buy a different pet. Once I bought a baby alligator for a dollar. We kept it in the bath tub, but it got bigger and bigger, and finally nobody could take a bath. So my grandmother said, “Get rid of that alligator!” So I took it the Central Park Zoo, and it’s probably still there today because alligators live for a long time (audience laughs).

Dick’s love of animals continued, and in 1989 he co-founded the Natural Balance Pet Foods company. He also raised money for guide dog schools. And while his dad facilitated a life-long devotion to animals, Dick credits his mom with setting his acting career in motion.

JL: I understand that your mom entered you in a photogenic contest when you were a kid, and you actually won it. I also heard that the judge of the contest was none other than Eleanor Roosevelt.

DVP: Yeah, it was Eleanor Roosevelt and Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia. My mother was a real stage mother, thank God, and I’ve had a great life because of her. The first job she got me I was acting in a Broadway play called Tapestry in Gray when I was just 7 years old.

After that, there was no turning back. Dick was constantly in demand, performing regularly on radio and on stage during the 1930’s and ’40’s. And though he was becoming well schooled in dramatic arts thanks to his mother, Dick’s dad made sure he was well rounded in other areas.

JL: Who first told you about the facts of life?

DVP: I was 14 years old and my father told me. And I was thinking, “Oh boy, I hope he’s right!” (sustained laughter from the audience)

JL: I also have it on good authority that at age 16, you dated a stripper and she made you get a tattoo. Is that true?

DVP: Yeah that’s true (laughs). It was on my arm, it was a horseshoe. She made me get it, it was stupid. She said, “I bet you’re not brave enough to get a tattoo.” And I said, ‘No, I’m brave enough.’ I was trying to impress her. In those days they didn’t use the electric needle, they used a real needle, and I can’t stand blood. And the blood is streaming down my arm, and she says, ‘Does it hurt you?’ And I said, ‘No, no.’ What a dopey thing to do. Oh, and then, I thought I would make out with her or something. NOTHING!” (laughter and applause)

No worries though, Dick made out fine (pardon the expression) with his lovely wife Pat, who he met while copying off her paper in school. And later, he managed to have two great families. One with Pat, and one on the hit show Eight is Enough, where he became beloved by audiences of all ages. Kids from both families came up on stage during our Father’s Day event, and had special words for the head of their respective clans.

Son Nels said, “You mean a lot to me Dad, you know that. You’ve made life a lot of fun for us, you and Mom.”

Dick’s son Vincent added, “My father is fantastic. he taught me so many things in life, and he’s always been very supportive. I love you Dad.”

Adam Rich, who played Dick’s on-screen son recalled, “Dick bailed me out of jail once. That’s above and beyond a TV dad (laughter). But Dick has always been more than a TV dad to me. He’s been like a real father, and I truly love him with all my heart. Dick Van Patten is one of the nicest people you’d ever wish to meet, and if you were ever lucky enough to meet Dick, he would meet you with a huge smile, and kindness, and great respect, and he treats everybody the same.”

Diane Kay, Dick’s TV daughter, added, “He’s my favorite friend and a wonderful actor. He set the standard for professionalism on our show, and he was the glue that kept all of our cast together. Dick used to tell us, ‘Remember, THESE are the good old days’. And so, I remember them.”

So do we all.


Tiger Degrades Wyndham

Posted August 19, 2015 By Triad Today
Tiger Woods, looking dejected

Tiger Woods
Once upon a time there was a star athlete who went to all of the frat parties with all of the most popular girls. Year after year, a less popular girl kept asking the big star to her party, but he turned her down for the more popular girls.

Then after a while, the star player started playing really badly, so as punishment for his sorry play, the boy’s frat brothers told him he would have to attend the less popular party if he wanted to stay on the team and keep coming to the popular parties. So the has-been star called up the unpopular girl who he had snubbed for many years, and told her he would do her a favor and attend her party after all.

The unpopular girl and her girlfriends were orgasmic over the news, so they went all out to make the popular boy feel like a big star again. The less popular boys who had faithfully attended the less popular party all these years felt hurt and demeaned. The girls who had been snubbed all those years didn’t realize that their dream date was only coming to their party because he was forced to. Maybe they were just in denial, or maybe the orgasm was worth the humiliation. No matter. The degradation was done.

Thus is the fabled saga of the Wyndham Championship and the has-been star athlete it had always coveted.

Sure, the presence of Tiger Woods will draw larger crowds and more media attention to the Wyndham, but at what cost to the integrity of the City, the event and its organizers? From the 1940’s through the 1980’s, The Wyndham (aka The Greater Greensboro Open) was a premiere, prestigious event that attracted golf’s top professionals: Ben Hogan, Byron Nelson, Gary Player, Billy Casper, Chi Chi Rodriquez, Ray Floyd, Tom Weiskopf, Lanny Wadkins, and of course, regional favorite Sam Snead, who won the tournament a record eight times. In fact it was Snead who encouraged the big stars to join him in Greensboro.

But about the time Slammin’ Sammy got long in the tooth, the Wyndham got short on big stars. Just try and name the guys who have won Wyndham over the past ten years. Do the names Brandt Snedeker, Arjun Abwal, or Camillo Villegas ring a bell? The Wyndham desperately needed Tiger during its post-Snead era, but Woods thought he was too good for Greensboro.

At one time, Tiger was the greatest, most dominant player in the world, and it would have been a wonderful gesture for him to honor Snead and the other old pros by attending the Wyndham every year, and bringing along his top flight fellow players. He could have even asked Arnie, Jack, Lee and Chi Chi to join him in Greensboro for an annual pro-am event to benefit a local charity. None of that happened because Tiger didn’t give a shit about the Wyndham.

Wyndham organizer Mark Brazil told the media, “It’s really neat that he (Tiger) is coming… at the end of the day he doesn’t have to come.” But Brazil is mistaken. Tiger HAS to play in Greensboro, and he has to win the tournament if he’s going to rack up enough points to compete in the FedEx Cup championship. In other words, the has-been athlete has to attend the less popular party, or else his frat bothers won’t let him back on the team.

For most of his life, everything has come easy to Tiger Woods: his talent, his recognition, his success as an amateur, his multi million dollar deal with Nike before he ever swung a pro club, his success as a pro, and his sex with strangers, the latter of which caused him to lose his wife and his golfing mojo.

Following a series of scandals, Tiger told reporters on February 19, 2009, “I thought I could get away with whatever I wanted to … I felt I was entitled.”

Well, thanks to the fawning Wyndham, Tiger is getting away with something again. He’s getting away with making us locals look stupid for honoring his snubs over the past 20 years.

The Wyndham has a proud tradition. It’s just too bad it had to lose that pride over an arrogant frat boy like Tiger Woods.


Handicapping the GOP Field

Posted August 12, 2015 By Triad Today
Republican party elephant symbol

GOP elephant candidates standing in a room. Original cartoon by Dwayne Booth aka Mr. Fish, from www.truthdig.com/cartoon/item/20080310_the_elephants_in_the_room

Original cartoon by Dwayne Booth aka Mr. Fish, from TruthDig.com


Despite what the mainstream media tells you, there are not 17 Republican candidates running for president.

In fact there are over twice that many declared candidates, including such household names as George Bailey, Skip Andrews, and Brian Russell. But George, Skip, and Brian are not what we refer to as top tier candidates, so you’ll never see them participating in a nationally televised, prime time debate. Of course, you didn’t even see the top 17 either. Only the so-called top ten Republican candidates were invited to take part in last week’s FOX News debate, and that was about ten too many for my liking. Nevertheless, I’ll try to be objective, and handicap the field as it stands right now.

Donald Trump
(billionaire businessman)

Had last Thursday’s debate been held in New York City, Trump’s bombast would have won him a lot more cheers from the audience. But the Cleveland crowd was pulling for their favorite son, Governor John Kasich, and they were in no mood to put up with the Donald’s nasty jabs, nor his propensity for bankrupting casinos and laying off thousands of people. In short, Trump’s star will continue to dim as he continues to show what a dim bulb he really is. Anger and arrogance may play well on a reality TV show, but not on the presidential stage. Like many men in power, Trump feels that he is not accountable to anyone but himself, and that act will start to wear thin with potential voters. My prediction is that his poll numbers will fall significantly by December, and he’ll drop out of the primary race if he sees he’s in danger of finishing fourth or lower in New Hampshire.

Jeb Bush
(former governor, Florida)

For all our talk about not liking dynasties, Americans are creatures of habit. That’s why we love to keep up with the Kardashians and the British royalty. And that’s why another Bush or Clinton will likely be our Commander in Chief by January, 2017. But, in all fairness, Jeb Bush has a lot going for him other than his family name. For one thing, he looks more presidential than any of the other GOP candidates, and he has a calming way about him. He was governor of a large state with a diverse population, and he successfully grew that state’s economy while improving its education system. He is thoughtful, intelligent, and understands the art of compromise. He has wisely distanced himself from his brother’s ill-advised invasion of Iraq, yet he is no apologist for the war on terror. Bottom line? Jeb is the odds-on favorite to capture the party’s nomination, and he has a good chance of becoming the third Bush to sit in the Oval Office.

Chris Christie
(governor, New Jersey)

When he’s the only guy on stage, or running a press conference, Governor Chris Christie can appear strident and intimidating. But because he shared a stage last week with Donald Trump, Christie actually came off looking presidential by comparison. But make no mistake, Christie is a dangerous man. He is a bully who angers when challenged by pointed questions from the news media. He escaped possible jail time for the “Bridge Gate” scandal because his underlings let themselves be thrown under the bus. And he continues to run New Jersey like it’s his own private business. A governor shouldn’t tell people to shut up, or bully and punish people who disagree with him. Neither should a president. Christie has zero chance of snagging the GOP nomination.

Scott Walker
(governor, Wisconsin)

Here’s a man who made his bones by attacking underpaid, under-appreciated teachers, and trying to bust up their union. Like many right-wing nuts in a position of power, Walker feels entitled to do whatever he wants, even more so after beating back a recall attempt by his detractors. To his credit, Walker is a radical who knows how to act rational when the cameras are on, and that makes him the biggest threat to Jeb Bush from within the Republican party. If Bush is the nominee, he may be forced to consider Walker as his VP in order to shore up some electoral votes in the North and Midwest.

Mike Huckabee
(former governor, Arkansas)

Mike came off as the most likeable guy in last week’s FOX debate. His home-spun philosophy plays well among all Republicans, and his sense of humor and genteel manner is not threatening to many who might otherwise disagree with his views. By GOP standards, he is imminently qualified to be president, but he doesn’t stand a chance of snagging the party’s nomination unless Bush and Walker split the vote, and supporters of lower tier candidates get behind Mike. In that regard, he would be a formidable VP nominee.

Other

In a year when immigration is a hot-button issue, you would think that Canadian-born latino Ted Cruz, or first-generation Cuban-American Marco Rubio, would have an edge in the presidential sweepstakes. But neither man is ready or qualified to run the country. While guys like Huckabee can think outside the box (proposing a fair tax for example), Rubio and Cruz only know how to spew the party line. If Joe Biden or Bernie Sanders is the Democratic nominee, then Cruz or Rubio might get the VP nod from Bush or Walker, but with Hillary on the ticket, then Carly Fiorina is the odds-on favorite to share the ticket with the Republican nominee. Meanwhile, Dr. Ben Carson is capturing the media’s attention because he is a black man running as a right-wing conservative. Still he doesn’t have the broad support among tea partiers to grab the top spot, and, for reasons just stated, he won’t get the second spot either. And then there’s Rand Paul. Like his father before him, Senator Paul has some great ideas, and I love the fact that he fights against ill-advised invasions of other countries, and invasions of our privacy. I really hate to make this about cosmetics, but Rand Paul just does not look or act presidential like Bush, Walker or Carson. Too bad.

Bottom line

After the North Carolina and Florida primaries on March 15, Jeb Bush will have all but wrapped up the nomination, and if Hillary is still the presumptive Democrat nominee, Jeb will tap (pardon the expression) Carly Fiorina as his VP.

Of course I could be wrong. After all, I also pick the Broncos to win the Super Bowl every year.


Bernie Sanders Can Make A Difference

Posted August 5, 2015 By Triad Today

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders
In 2007, Hillary Clinton was the presumptive Democratic nominee for president, but she was derailed by a man with better ideas, more charisma, and a bigger following. Now, eight years later, Hillary is once again the presumptive nominee of her party. The problem for Mrs. Clinton, though, is that history might repeat itself. She may once again be derailed by a man with better ideas, more charisma, and a bigger following. That man is independent Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, a 73-year-old political rebel who neither party has been able to buy or bully.

Sanders officially launched his campaign for the White House on May 26, with polls showing him trailing Hillary by 38 points in New Hampshire. By the end of June he had cut that lead down to 8. And not only is he gaining on the Democratic favorite, he’s actually beating the Republicans’ top guns in head-to-head match-ups. He leads Jeb Bush 48% to 47%, Scott Walker 48% to 42%, and Donald Trump 59% to 38%. Yes it’s early in the process, but those kinds of numbers should cause serious concern among the old guard in both parties. Right now, those party loyalists are holding on to the hope that Americans who agree with Bernie’s approach to government will come to their senses by February. But what if they don’t?

Everywhere Sanders appears in public, he draws record crowds, and they have the same enthusiasm for him as did the crowds who showed up for candidate Obama in 2008. What’s more, Bernie is a master at using social media and the internet, which helps him reach and communicate with followers in every State. Last month, for example, he gave a speech via video simulcast and invited small groups of supporters to gather and watch the webcast. In Winston-Salem alone, over 150 of his supporters attended the event, and at Democratic headquarters no less. That was just one of the more than 3,500 such gatherings nationwide which drew over 100,000 devotees.

One of those supporters was John Schoonover who told The Greensboro News & Record, “I’ve never worn anybody’s button before, but Bernie’s different.”

That’s an understatement. Bernie is one of the few elected officials who voted against the invasion of Iraq in 2003 (Hillary and the GOP field supported that war).

He’s for universal health care and a single payer system, calling it “Medicare for all.” (All of the other candidates merely fought over what part of a flawed system they liked). Bernie supported same-sex marriage throughout his political career (Hillary just came to her senses on that issue two years ago). He is pushing for free tuition at public universities, and has made income inequality the lynchpin of his campaign. And he opposed the Trans Pacific Partnership, which will just continue the devastation NAFTA has already wrought on the American middle class. He’s also the oldest Presidential candidate in the race, the longest serving independent in federal history, and he’s Jewish. Yeah, I’d say Bernie Sanders is different, and there’s nothing wrong with that.

Here in America we tend to write off candidates who aren’t part of the political mainstream because we’re told by columnists and pundits that so-called fringe candidates can’t win. And even though we might believe in what that fringe candidate stands for, we tend to vote for the more established politicians because our guy just doesn’t stand a chance. Well Bernie Sanders does stand a chance, and if everyone who agrees with his positions votes for him in the primaries, then he will be the Democratic Presidential nominee in 2016. Yes Bernie Sanders is different, and it’s a difference we should all embrace.


Enough Already with Bruce/Caitlyn

Posted July 29, 2015 By Triad Today

Caitlyn Jenner on left, Arthur Ashe on right
Back in 1976 Bruce Jenner’s likeness was everywhere. He was on magazine covers, cereal boxes, and posters, and appeared on talk shows, variety shows, and in movies. Having just won the Olympic gold medal in the Decathlon, and named as the AP’s Male Athlete of the Year, Jenner was a sports hero of the highest order, and the attention heaped upon him was well deserved.

Today, nearly forty years later, you can’t look anywhere without seeing Jenner’s image again, only this time around, he’s in the news BECAUSE of his likeness, and not because of an outstanding achievement.

In those intervening four decades, Jenner hooked up with the Kardashian clan and learned first-hand from wife Kris and step-daughter Kim how to orchestrate, manipulate, and sustain an outlandish event, then turn it into a cash cow. For Kris and Kim it was a sex video. For Bruce it was slowly transforming into what he refers to as a woman, and calling himself Caitlyn. I have resisted writing about the Jenner story for three reasons.

I didn’t want to further legitimize the Kardashian circus machine which so enthralls the American public. I didn’t want to be labeled “transphobic.” And I didn’t want to disrespect those who have struggled quietly to become transgender. But after the ESPY’s gave Bruce/Caitlyn the Arthur Ashe Courage Award earlier this month, I could no longer sit back and stay silent.

First of all, there is nothing courageous about a multi-millionaire, hen-pecked white guy taking hormones and wearing a dress for Vanity Fair. Even worse is that the politically correct ESPY crowd (most of whom probably never met Arthur Ashe), passed over some very deserving people with real courage to honor Bruce/Caitlyn. I’m sorry, but I find the whole thing to be a disrespectful publicity stunt that dishonors Mr. Ashe’s memory.

I was fortunate to spend a Saturday afternoon with Arthur back in the fall of 1988. Some mutual friends of ours, Drs. Sandra and Stephen Vaughan, were hosting a private party to celebrate the publication of Arthur’s groundbreaking trilogy, A Hard Road to Glory, and it was a chance to honor the man and his achievements. We all knew that Arthur had undergone heart surgery several years earlier, but none of us knew that the great humanitarian had contracted AIDS from tainted blood used during his operation. In fact, as best I can recall, Arthur himself had only learned of his fate a month or so prior to our meeting.

Anyway, about a half hour before the party, a knock came at my office door. It was Arthur. He had just gotten off the interstate, and wanted to make sure he had the correct directions to the Vaughan’s house. He was quiet and soft-spoken that day, which was par for the course for Arthur. But he also seemed a bit distant and sullen, and that was not normal for the tennis great. I gave him directions, then followed in my car to the event. Several years later we all learned why Arthur was overly quiet that day. Hell, he was probably still in shock.

His plan was to keep the AIDS diagnosis private, but, faced with being outed by a journalist from USA Today, Arthur finally and reluctantly went public in 1992.

It wasn’t the first time Arthur had dealt with adversity. Forty years earlier Ashe had been denied access to the whites-only city tennis courts in his hometown of Richmond, Virginia. He spent the rest of his life fighting racism, even to the point of being arrested for protesting apartheid. Overcoming racism took one kind of courage. Facing a horrible death took another kind of courage altogether.

Ashe had both kinds. Some columnists and commentators have speculated that, were he alive today, Arthur would embrace Bruce/Caitlyn’s “courageous” transformation, but I disagree. Arthur didn’t suffer fools, frauds, or showboats lightly. Jenner is first and foremost a celebrity in the Kardashian mold. He is not a hero. He is not a role model, and he is certainly not courageous. Lauren Hill was courageous. She died in April at age 19 after playing basketball while battling cancer. Noah Galloway is courageous too. He competes in adventure runs despite having lost an arm and a leg in Iraq. Either Lauren or Noah would have been fitting recipients of the Arthur Ashe Courage Award. But then, neither of them was a millionaire showman like Bruce/Caitlyn.

And lest you think mine are the ramblings of an old, out-of-touch heterosexual guy, be advised that even some in the LGBT community are none too pleased with Bruce/Caitlyn’s grandstanding either. They point out that, unlike most of the estimated 700,000 transgender people in America, Jenner hasn’t lived with the fear of losing a job, being beaten up at work, or denied opportunities to support a family.

I can’t possibly know what it’s like to overcome racism, and thus far I don’t know what it’s like to face a death sentence, so I suppose I don’t really know what courage is. But I sure as hell know what courage ISN’T, and that’s posing for Vanity Fair.


Grandberry on Different Stage with Same Mission

Posted July 22, 2015 By Triad Today
Keith Grandberry (right), with Oprah Winfrey and Bob Brown

Keith Grandberry (right),
with Oprah Winfrey and Bob Brown

As CEO of the Winston Salem Urban League, Keith Grandberry acted locally while thinking globally. Today as founder of Helping Hands Consultants, he acts globally but thinks locally.

I first got to know Keith when he was transforming the Urban League from a local agency with limited scope, into a regional organization that served people from all walks of life. His approach to meeting the needs of a diverse population was particularly effective following the great Recession of 2008, and subsequent economic downturn that resulted in unprecedented lay-offs. I recall asking him once if having the word “urban” in its title meant that WSUL only served minorities. Keith responded by saying, “The Urban League is in 18 counties and many of the people we serve are not minorities. We serve everyone. We serve middle-income people. We serve folks who have lost their jobs, and who need to be re-trained. We try to provide a service to everyone, because we believe everyone is important.”

I quickly learned that Keith meant what he said. He worked with Mayor Pro Tem Vivian Burke and Piedmont Federal to have the bank donate a building to the Urban League, where the City of Winston-Salem, Forsyth Tech and Wake Forest University partnered with the League to establish a training center for people who had been displaced from their jobs. He obtained a $100,000 grant from the Wachovia Foundation that allowed WSUL to help unemployed managers and executives prepare to re-enter the job market.

He expanded the senior program from two counties to eighteen, making it the largest subsidized program for seniors in the state, and one of the largest in the nation. In addition, those seniors had access to social media and computer training through a Digital Inclusion program. As a result, people over 55 had the skills to re-enter the workforce.

And Keith founded the Youth Leadership Institute in partnership with Winston-Salem Forsyth County Schools’ Alternative program and the Nehemiah Leadership Institute, in an effort to stem the rising high school dropout rate. Historically about 70% of students who are sent to alternative schools drop out. But Keith teamed with volunteers from Winston-Salem State University and the City to create a mentoring, tutoring, and paid internship program that engaged students. The result? 95% of the students stayed in school.

Keith also used his considerable networking skills to persuade high profile individuals to support and participate in a number of initiatives. For example, nationally recognized facilitator Stedman Graham helped structure the youth program. Meanwhile Keith partnered with UNC School of the Arts to establish the Larry Leon Hamlin and Sylvia Sprinkle Hamlin scholarship. And he persuaded his friend Maya Angelou to lend her name to Novant’s Women’s Health and Wellness Center, one of the few such centers in the country named after an African American woman. As such, Grandberry demonstrated that education, the arts, and healthcare were all inexorably linked to job readiness and economic development.

Given his many accomplishments and track record for empowering people by using creative strategies, it was not surprising that last year, following President Obama’s African Summit, Keith was encouraged by his mentor and White House advisor Robert J. Brown, to start his own company.

Helping Hands Consultants is a global development company that is, among other things, engaged in numerous projects that will strengthen Africa’s economy. Thus far, Keith has met and negotiated with leaders from the Kingdom of Lesotho, Ghana, Liberia, Botswana, and South Africa (including Winnie Mandela) to bring jobs and industry to the continent. But American and European companies don’t want to invest in countries with an unskilled labor force. That’s where Keith’s success at the Urban League comes in handy. In some areas of Africa, 90% of high schools have no library, and most provinces have no hospitals. And so, Keith is networking with investors to establish libraries and hospitals, along with job training programs, all in an effort to empower people by providing education, healthcare, and resources that will make them employable. It is the same multi-faceted, humanitarian approach to economic development that Grandberry used here locally, and now he is making it work on a global stage.

When he’s not traveling overseas, Keith appears as a regular member of my Triad Today Roundtable panel. Recently I asked what has motivated him all these years to promote economic empowerment, and he cited the teachings of his mother, grandmother, Winnie Mandela, and Bob Brown, saying, “Helping others is not a choice. You don’t choose to help others only when you’re up, or ignore them when you’re down. You choose to help others because paying it forward is God’s way of giving his blessings through us.” His is a philosophy that has helped thousands of folks in the Piedmont Triad, and is now doing the same for thousands more in Africa. They are fortunate to have Keith Grandberry as an advocate, and I am proud to have him as my friend.


Medicare to Cover End-Of-Life Counseling

Posted July 15, 2015 By Triad Today

A doctor giving end-of-life counseling to a patient
In 1920, H.L. Mencken wrote, “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” University of Michigan professors Arthur Lupia and Jesse Menning echoed those sentiments at a 2006 symposium in Lincoln, Nebraska. Said Menning, “Politicians can use fear to achieve self-serving outcomes (or suboptimal policies) that are bad for voters. In it, a politician provides information about a threat. His statement need not be true.”

In the spring of 2009, President Obama was in the throes of lobbying for his proposed healthcare reform legislation. The Affordable Care Act would, among other things, provide for Medicare-covered end-of-life counseling. Under the plan, doctors would be reimbursed for sitting down with their elderly patients, and educating them about such things as a living will and hospice care. It was a good plan too, because according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, about 75 percent of the people who die each year in America are age 65 or older, and many of them don’t understand the benefits of hospice care until it is too late.

In an effort to derail “Obamacare”, Sarah Palin, Representative Virginia Foxx and other Republican alarmists spewed inflammatory myths about end-of-life counseling, saying that it would allow the government to create “death panels”, and decide when seniors would die. “Republicans have a better solution that is pro-life because it will not put seniors in a position of being put to death by their government,” said Foxx. It was the kind of political hate speech and fearmongering that Mencken and Menning had warned about, and it was effective. Obama had to jettison Medicare-covered end-of-life counseling from ACA, or else watch his healthcare reform package go down the tubes.

In the years since then, a modicum of reason has replaced some of the rhetoric, thanks in part to a 2014 report from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) titled “Dying in America.” According to the Associated Press, the report concluded that “too many deaths are filled with breathing machines, feeding tubes and other treatments that fail to extend life, and make its final chapter more painful and unpleasant.” That report inspired Medicare officials to announce last Wednesday their intentions to fully cover end-of-life counseling starting in 2016.

Dr. Joe Rotella, Chief Medical Officer of the Academy of Hospice and Palliative Care told the AP that Medicare’s move is a “little miracle, given the death panels furor.” Rotella also said that he thinks the controversy has finally passed. The AMA even jumped on the bandwagon with President-elect Andrew Gurman saying, “This issue has been mischaracterized in the past, and it is time to facilitate patient choices about advance care planning.” And here in North Carolina, last week’s announcement was long overdue for hospice providers. “Hospice care allows patients to live out their final days and weeks in dignity and comfort. Medicare’s new regulation will help facilitate education about the care we provide so that patients can avail themselves of hospice services while there’s still time,” said Denise Watson, CEO of Mountain Valley Hospice & Palliative Care.

And so, barring any unexpected uproar over the next 60 days, the new regulation will be cleared for implementation next year, and it will allow some 55 million Medicare beneficiaries and their families to make more informed choices about end-of-life care.

Back in 2009, “death panels” was a Republican talking point by political alarmists, designed to derail healthcare reform. In 2015 those same alarmists are six years older, and that much closer to needing end-of-life care themselves. I guess now their muted opposition to Medicare covered counseling is what Menning meant by self-serving outcomes.


Governor McCrory Speaks Out on Triad Today

Posted July 8, 2015 By Triad Today

Governor Pat McCrory speaks with Jim Longworth on the set of Triad Today
Last week Governor Pat McCrory stopped by the ABC45 studio to tape a special edition of Triad Today.

It was McCrory’s sixth visit to the program. The unedited half hour discussion will air this weekend. What follows are highlights from my exclusive interview with the Governor.


JL: In light of the Charleston church massacre, would you be in favor of stricter gun policies such as a much longer waiting period, and upping the age limit for gun ownership?

PM: I don’t think we need any new laws, but I do think we shouldn’t weaken the laws that we currently have.

That’s one reason I want the state legislature to continue to allow the sheriffs to do background checks, because it’s often our 100 sheriffs in North Carolina who know the background of someone who’s maybe involved in domestic violence, or has mental illness problems which federal background checks don’t always show…The guy who did this terrible crime in Charleston, not only was he a racist, but I also think he had some drug and mental health issues. … Everyone’s talking about the gun issue and the racial issues, but I think there’s some serious drug and mental health issues too.

JL: You’re in favor of banning the Confederate flag from license plates, but—

PN: The battle flag, and that’s from a state-sponsored license plate.

JL: I understand, but is that really going to make a difference?

PM: For a shooting like this, no. But the battle flag has been hijacked for the last 50 years by the KKK and now by hate groups. I think we did the right thing by not allowing the battle flag on state-sponsored license plates because of the signal it sends. But, at the same time, I think there’s an overreaction on the Left to take it out of war memorials and cemeteries.

JL: Speaking of racial divides, there have been a number of incidents in which a racist white cop shoots or assaults an innocent black person, and it’s always in a city where blacks are under represented on the force. Shouldn’t we require local police departments to hire according to the demographic make-up of that city?

PM: I’m not sure that would be legal because then you’d be making an employment decision based upon someone’s skin color…but I’m a firm believer in having a pool of candidates that resembles the community.

JL: Same-sex marriage is legal in our state, yet the General Assembly overrode your veto of a bill that will now allow magistrates and register of deeds to opt out of serving same-sex couples if it offends their religious sensibilities. Any comment?

PM: I’m conservative when it comes to marriage between a man and a woman, but I believe I was sworn to uphold the Constitution and the laws of North Carolina…and I don’t think a magistrate should be exempt from that… If you have a job and you swore an oath to the Constitution, you ought to follow it. And if you vehemently disagree with it because of whatever belief, then you ought to quit your job.

JL: The General Assembly is also trying to block you on bringing a bond referendum to the voters. Why do we need the bonds you’re proposing?

PM: I’m a firm believer that we have to invest in the next generation… We’re the ninth-most populous state in America, and we haven’t had a bond referendum in fifteen years, and during that fifteen years, we became the ninth-most populous state. The first part of the bond is for transportation, and that would, for example, finish I-74 in Winston-Salem which is desperately needed. If we don’t pass the bond, then I-74 won’t be built for another decade. So are we going to prepare for growth, or are we going to react to growth?

JL: Senator Wade finally prevailed and the General Assembly has passed a law that will restructure Greensboro City Council, and essentially strip the mayor’s office of power. As a former mayor, and now governor, do you think state government should meddle in local government?

PM: As a conservative I believe in local control, so the governor and the state legislature shouldn’t meddle in Greensboro City Council business. If they want to do that, then go run for mayor, go run for city council. You were elected senator, so do your job… For whatever reason when some people get power in one area they want to keep the power they might have had from where they lived.


The Governor and I covered a number of other topics during the half hour, including his revised approach to Voter Photo ID’s, the relationship between education and the private sector, and whether he would consider running as vice president if asked by the party nominee. The full interview can be seen Saturday at 7:30am on WXLV ABC45 and again on Sunday at 11am on WMYV MY48.


“Cowgirl” Kathy Garver to visit Triad

Posted July 2, 2015 By Triad Today

Kathy Garver today, and with the cast of Family Affair
Kathy Garver is most famous for her role as orphaned teenager Cissy Davis in the hit comedy Family Affair, which aired on CBS from 1966 to 1971. But Cissy was not Kathy’s first role. In fact, by the time Family Affair premiered, Garver was already a Hollywood veteran who always seemed to play characters younger than her actual age. At 11, for example, she could pass for a six-year-old child when standing next to Charlton Heston in The Ten Commandments. But young Miss Garver made her mark on the small screen too, appearing in over a dozen TV shows before she reached her teens. And while she excelled in comedies and dramas, Kathy’s favorite roles were in Westerns, like The Rifleman, The Big Valley, and Daniel Boone.

KG: I love Westerns. I’m a cowgirl at heart, and I love to be outside. And I love animals, and so it was really fun for me to ride the horses and to be shooting outside instead of being in a stuffy studio. It was just a delight. I also liked the stories and I liked the people. I liked it when men were men and women were women (laughs) and we were all forging forth. I’m an adventurer and a romantic, so all of that mixed together to make me really like Westerns.

Kathy liked Western stars, too, so it’s no surprise that she had great chemistry with Family Affair patriarch Brian Keith, himself a veteran of TV and movie Westerns. But in order for CBS to land Keith as Bill Davis, bachelor uncle to Cissy and her younger siblings Jody (Johnny Whitaker) and Buffy (Anissa Jones), the Tiffany Network had to pay Brian a big salary, give him a piece of the profits, and make him a promise that he would only have to work 29 days a year. That last condition was great for Keith, but not so much for Garver and the rest of the crew.

JL: It’s hard enough to learn lines for one show, but due to Brian’s schedule, you had to keep 32 episodes in your head at once. What was that like?

KG: Well that was a challenge (laughs). It was one of those things that one learns to live with. In reality though, I think it was more of a test for the wardrobe ladies’ abilities to try and match things. There was this one episode (season 3, episode 27: “Flower Power”), a hippie episode that we shot during Brian’s 29 day “visit” to our show, and I filmed in an outfit with this necklace, and we shot all of his scenes. Fast forward two months later, and I had taken some of my wardrobe home. Well, I didn’t realize we were picking up that scene, and I didn’t have the necklace with me. So poor Thelma, our wardrobe lady, had to speed out of there and go all around Hollywood. She did not find the same necklace, but it was quite similar, and if you have an eagle eye, you’ll see it on that episode.

Despite a challenging work schedule, though, Garver recalls her time on Family Affair with great fondness.

JL: What made Family Affair so popular and so enduring?

KG: Classic story lines. We had fabulous writers on our series including Edmund Hartmann who oversaw the scripts, and was also president of the Writers Guild, and had written wonderful movies. But it was the classic story line of, “Here’s the problem, how are we going to solve it?” Then there’s the climax, and the denouement. We also had wonderful actors. And it endured because it was something to which anybody could relate to today, no matter what kind of family you have. And the characters all loved each other, so love to me is all-enduring, classic, and will be around forever.

Nevertheless, Family Affair was canceled by CBS after five seasons. ABC was then poised to pick up the popular show for a sixth season, but went with a new family comedy instead. That new sitcom was The Brady Bunch. Kathy was disappointed, but not deterred.

KG: I think everyone was kind of surprised because it was not expected. But then you say, “OK it’s time for the next move.” I had graduated college, so I thought, “Should I be a lawyer? Should I do a play? Should I go back and work in films?” So I was ready for my next step.

That next step included more TV and film jobs, and a career in voiceover work. Kathy has also written a book titled Surviving Cissy: My Family Affair of Life in Hollywood, which is being released in September. She sent me an advance copy of the book which is chock-full of entertaining stories, like the time she appeared alongside Burt Reynolds on Hollywood Squares.

JL: Burt asked you to spend the weekend with him, but you turned him down. Why?

KG: Dumb (laughs). He was darling and he was nice. Maybe I was a little afraid, a little timid. I don’t think I was ready to make that next big step, spending the weekend with a movie star, no matter how appealing.

That kind of maturity and restraint was an indication of how well rounded and well grounded Kathy was, despite her celebrity status.

JL: You wrote in your book that you never wanted to be a star, that you just wanted to be a working actress. So how did you stay so level-headed? And how did you avoid the tragedies that had befallen so many other young actors, including Anissa who died of a drug overdose at 18?

KG: It was my parents who did not spend all my money, but saved it all for me. It was my education. I went to school and found out there’s more to the world than just acting. I learned how to control my finances so I wouldn’t spend $2,000 on a pair of shoes, then when a series is canceled, not have any money. And I invested wisely. And it was not doing drugs.

These days when Kathy’s not acting or teaching other actors the art of voiceover, she is a popular fixture at nostalgia events, such as the upcoming Western Film Fair in Winston-Salem.

KG: I love to meet the people at those events. It’s a real ego boost when someone says, “Oh I watched you on Family Affair. It was my favorite show!” So it’s kind of nice. I like that.

Yes, but do Kathy’s fans know she was really 21 years old while playing Cissy as a 16-year-old?

JL: You’re famous for being able to play characters who are younger than you are in real life. Since you look so young, will you be playing 90 year olds when you’re 100?

KG: (laughs) I hope so, Jim. I can only hope.

Surviving Cissy can be pre-ordered from Amazon.com. The Western Film Fair runs from July 8 through July 11. For more information, visit WesternFilmFair.com.