Commentaries Archive


Rifleman Star Johnny Crawford to Visit Triad

Posted June 19, 2014 By Triad Today

Johnny Crawford
In 1970, USC film student John Longenecker produced “The Resurrection of Broncho Billy”. It was co-written by a pre-“Halloween” John Carpenter, and went on to win an Oscar for best short subject. The story is about a boy who grew up in a big city and dreamed of becoming a cowboy. Not surprisingly, Longenecker asked his old friend Johnny Crawford to star in the movie because Crawford had grown up in Los Angeles, and became one of the most popular TV cowboys of all time.

I asked Johnny if the film was autobiographical for him.

JC: Yeah. I was just like you and other kids at the time. I watched “B” westerns on Saturday mornings. I had all of the toy guns, and the Hopalong Cassidy stuff, and cap pistols. We all played cowboys and Indians, and my bicycle was my horse.

But not all horses had two wheels.

JC: There was this amusement park right off Beverly Blvd., and they had a pony ride, and my parents would try and avoid driving by that park because I wasn’t happy until I had gotten to sit on a pony. My favorite was named Goldie, and they strapped me into the saddle, and he trotted around with me.

When he wasn’t riding ponies, Johnny was singing around the house and seemed to love performing. By age five, he was acting in his first play, a production of “Mr. Belvedere”. His talent was evident, and a product of good genes.

JC: My father was a film editor at Columbia, and both he and my mother performed in local theatre. We would go see those plays and I thought it was just great that they were doing that.

As fate would have it, Crawford’s Sunday school teacher was also an agent, so she sent the young thespian on a series of auditions, including one for Walt Disney who was casting Mouseketeers for his new “Mickey Mouse Club” TV show. Crawford’s imitation of singer Johnnie Ray landed him a slot in the original ensemble which also featured Annette Funicello. But the euphoria of being on national television was short lived.

JC: There were so many of us that they decided to focus on a smaller group, going from twenty four Mouseketeers down to twelve, and I was let go after the first season. It was very disappointing. But having done “Mickey Mouse Club” gave me confidence.

The show also opened doors for Johnny, including a stand-out role in Lux Video Theatre’s “Little Boy Lost”, and that led to roles in other live TV dramas. Then came his shortest and most successful audition ever, for a show that would make him a household name. It was December of 1957, and Four Star founder Dick Powell and the Levy Gardner Laven company had cast Chuck Connors to star in an episode of Dick’s popular “Zane Gray Theatre”, which would also serve as the pilot for a new series titled “The Rifleman”. The story was about rancher Lucas McCain and his son Mark, trying to make a life for themselves in the old West. In 1990, Connors told TV Guide, “The producers and I interviewed 20 or 30 kids to play Mark. Then Johnny came in the room, and before we even talked to him, I said, ‘That’s him. That’s the Rifleman’s son! ‘ “

As the title of the series suggests, the elder McCain was proficient with a rifle, and in the course of five seasons, he gunned down hundreds of bad guys. Despite the violence though, the show remained popular with both male and female audiences. I asked Johnny why.

JC: The father/son relationship WAS the show really. It gave the show a dimension that other shows didn’t have, which was a family of two people trying to make it in the old West when it was pretty lawless. But it was always understood that killing was a last resort, and the violence wasn’t to be used frivolously.

As the show grew in popularity, so did Johnny. In those days it was typical for teen TV idols to launch a singing career. “Donna Reed” stars Shelley Fabares and Paul Peterson did it. So had Ricky Nelson.

JC: A friend of ours was at a cocktail party talking to Bob Keane who was president of DelFi records and had discovered Richie Valens. Bob said he was looking for a young actor who could sing, and our friend told him about me. We had a meeting and I signed a contract. My first song was “Daydreams”.

Soon Crawford found himself having to multi task. He was acting, recording (he had 5 hit records), singing on American Bandstand, and making personal appearances, including one for the grand opening of the nation’s first IHOP. I wondered if he ever felt stressed, and that his time and talents were being stretched too thin.

JC: Well I also had homework to do, but I loved to watch all of the TV Westerns. So when I was supposed to be learning my lines and doing my homework, I would position myself on the floor, in front of the TV, and have all those things spread out in front of me. I would manage to do my homework during commercials.

Johnny kept up his frantic pace for five years while filming “The Rifleman”, and it almost extended to another season.

JC: I remember they were talking about doing a 6th season in color and expanding it to an hour. That would have been good for me financially, but I’m glad we didn’t do it because there’s something magical about a two reeler. Less is more. It’s just sweeter than something that drags on. It’s more gripping.

Following “The Rifleman”, Crawford pulled a stint in the Army, and continued to act in films, like John Wayne’s “El Dorado”, in which he had his clothes on, and in “The Naked Ape”, in which he had his clothes off.

JC: I still get flack from that. There’s a little nudity in the film and it’s brief, but the whole thing is sweet and romantic. It didn’t bother me at all. It’s one shot, and it’s very tasteful.

But since Hugh Hefner produced the film, a photo of Crawford shows up in “Playboy”, giving Johnny the distinction of having been the first male to appear with full frontal nudity in the iconic magazine.

In 1992 Crawford got back to his musical roots and formed his own orchestra, which plays songs from the 1920’s and ’30’s. The band has performed at awards shows and is available for private functions.

Johnny is also still making personal appearances, including next month’s Western Film Fair, July 9-12 in Winston-Salem.

JC: I enjoy people and that’s why the Western Film Fair will be so much fun because I can sit in a chair all day and meet people who are so friendly, and warm and excited to meet me, and it’s thrilling.

For more information on the Western Film Fair, visit WesternFilmFair.com.


Hardy Boys, Baywatch Star to Visit Triad

Posted June 11, 2014 By Triad Today

Parker Stevenson
The first thing people ask me when I talk about the Western Film Fair is, “Which celebrities are coming?” The second question is, “What’s their connection to Westerns?” In that regard, Parker Stevenson has come full circle, having appeared on Gunsmoke at age 22, and now, having just completed filming episodes of Longmire at age 62.

Like most of us guys who grew up in the 1950s and early 1960s, Parker came by his love of Westerns honestly.

PS: I watched Roy Rogers, and The Rifleman, then I’d go running around the back yard playing cowboy and different characters. My Dad and I also loved Gunsmoke.Parker Stevenson Years later the first TV appearance I did was on Gunsmoke, and being on that sound stage was like playing make-believe in the back yard.

And though there’s delightful symmetry in pretending to be Matt Dillon at age 5, then ending up appearing on Matt Dillon’s TV show, Parker’s first acting job had nothing to do with cowboys.

PS: In kindergarten I played a pumpkin or some kind of vegetable (laughs). And I decided this is the place for me!

That love of acting was nurtured by Parker’s mother, actress Sarah Meade.

PS: In the Summers I’d go to the Poconos to see her in summer stock shows. And she’d take me to New York City to see plays that she had friends in, so I got to go back stage, which was kind of cool.

By age 14, Stevenson was auditioning for commercials, and later, while still at Princeton, landed a number of TV and film roles. Then came his big break – being cast as Frank Hardy in The Hardy Boys Mysteries.

Parker StevensonPS: It was 1976, I had graduated from college and was about to start the graduate business program at NYU, when I was asked to come out to Los Angeles and audition for The Hardy Boys. Shaun (Cassidy) was already set and I was the last person to read. They sort of matched us up together and it was a good combination. We loved working together, we worked easily together. We had fun together. We were sort of different, so it was nice.

Nice, but crazy. The Hardy Boys quickly became a big hit with teenage girls, and the show’s stars were inundated with fan mail.

PS: A lot of the popularity was because of the books, but a lot of it was because of Shaun’s music, and it was a time when merchandising was really big. T-shirts, posters, all that stuff generated enormous fan mail.

Parker StevensonFollowing The Hardy Boys run, Parker was in demand as a guest star on a number of TV series including The Love Boat and Murder She Wrote. In 1986 he landed the role of Union officer Billy Hazard in the mini series North & South: Book Two, in which he worked with his wife Kirstie Alley, who played his sister in the film. North & South also gave the young actor another chance to ride horses and shoot guns. But for Parker, appearing in a Civil War drama had special meaning.

PS: I had grown up staring at this portrait in my grandparents’ house in Philadelphia. It was of General George Gordon Meade, Union commander at Gettysburg, who, it turns out, was my great-great-grandfather. So being in North & South became kind of personal. It became a wonderful connection for me and my mother’s side of the family.

In the years that followed North & South, Parker continued to act in shows like Melrose Place and Matlock while he and Kirstie raised a family. The couple had an amicable divorce in 1997, after which Parker went on to star in and direct Baywatch.

Parker StevensonJL: How did you get the role of Craig Pomeroy on Baywatch?

PS: They had seen me in a movie I did called Lifeguard and thought I seemed like a California beach guy, which I wasn’t.

JL: Maybe they just wanted a vegetable in swim trunks.

PS: Yeah they wanted a vegetable in a red bathing suit (laughs). But Baywatch was really fun … going to work early in the morning and you get to the coast and the sun comes up, and Oh my God it’s just beautiful. It was a great gig.

Parker StevensonParker continued acting after Baywatch,but increasingly his interests turned to still photography, and forming his own company, Shadow Works.

PS: Well I’ve taken pictures since I was a kid. I was always running around shooting my friends, shooting weddings in my neighborhood at 13 (laughs). About ten years ago people started asking me if I would do head shots of them, and I found I loved it.

Naturally I asked the multi-talented Parker which he enjoyed most, acting, directing, or photography.

Parker StevensonPS: I realized this last couple of weeks how much I missed acting. I love it. I love the process. But I love directing too because it lets me put people in the right configuration, with the right camera position and lens and lighting, and make things look ideally the way they should be. That’s also why I love photography, plus there’s no one re-editing what I shoot (laughs).

Fans can meet Parker at next month’s Western Film Fair, July 9-12 in Winston- Salem. He might even regale you with stories from “Dodge City”…

PS: On Gunsmoke, if the horses went to the bathroom, someone would run out in a cart with a broom and a shovel, and it was gone just like that. I thought, “Man, this place is really clean.”

For more information on the Western Film Fair, visit WesternFilmFair.com.


The Washington Redskins Debate

Posted June 4, 2014 By Triad Today

Washington Racists?
After L.A. Clippers owner Donald Sterling was taped using racially charged language, NBA commissioner Adam Silver acted swiftly to ban the old billionaire from basketball.

Not unexpectedly, the incident sparked water cooler discussions, tweets and blogs about racism in society. Collaterally, the Sterling incident also renewed debate over other sports-related racism, in particular, whether the Washington Redskins football team should change its name.

Actually, the Redskins controversy has been brewing for years, and each time it cycles back into the news, team owner Dan Snyder repeats his claim that the name is not offensive, and that he has no intention of ditching it. But this time around, Snyder found himself having to defend his stance in the wake of Sterling’s racist rant, which cast a pall over team owners in every sport. Snyder also had to contend with Congress.

On May 22, forty-nine Senators voted to urge NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell to get rid of the name Redskins, with Senator Harry Reid declaring the word racist. The vote was largely symbolic because Congress can’t force Goodell or Snyder into changing their shorts, much less a team name. Nevertheless, our gridlocked elected officials in D.C. wanted to look like they were doing something, so they weighed in against racism.

The truth is, unless fans stop watching Redskins games in person and on television, or unless the NFL bans the team from appearing on TV, then Snyder will ride out this latest storm and stick to his guns. The question is, should he?

In response to Senator Reid’s recent statement, Redskins team President Bruce Allen wrote, “Our use of ‘Redskins’ as the name of our football team for more than 80 years has always been respectful of and shown reverence toward the proud legacy and traditions of Native Americans.”

In the past, Snyder and his minions have argued that they have the support of American Indians, and that the word Redskins is not racist in and of itself. Fact is, they’re correct on both counts. In December of 2013, author and Slate.com columnist David Skinner wrote a balanced and compelling article about the use of the word Redskins. He noted that in 2005, Ives Goddard, Indian Language Scholar for the Smithsonian, reported that, “the actual origin of the word (Redskins) is entirely benign.” Goddard’s conclusion was based on extensive research including that “Redskins” as used by early Europeans was derived from “Native American phrases involving the color red in combination with terms for ‘skin’ and ‘man’.” Goddard went on to say, “These phrases were part of a racial vocabulary that Indians often used to designate themselves in opposition to others.” And, he cited numerous letters and documents written by tribal leaders who used the term “redskins” in a descriptive manner, not a derogatory one.

Nevertheless, Congress, the media, and other groups seem hell bent on extreme political correctness even if the offending word doesn’t offend the very group they seek to protect. Whether well meaning or not, these social arbiters have determined that the “R” word is as offensive as the “N” word. It’s not. True, both words came to us in similar fashion. Like redskins, The “N” word is derived from and adapted by cultures who initially sought only to describe skin color. The difference in the two words, however, has to do largely with how and why they evolved into modern day usage.

Redneck racists and fanatical religious bigots have, over time, turned the “N” word into a vile put down, while those same groups hardly ever refer to Native Americans as anything but “Indians”. Ironically the limited use of the “R” word in a racist context may be, in large part, attributed to the Washington Redskins themselves, a popular football team which has been around for nearly a century.

Over the last 80 years, racists have handed down their hateful use of the “N” word from generation to generation, while thinking of “Redskins” as a respectful term for a rough and tumble bunch of macho football players.

For now, Dan Snyder’s in-house research continues to show that the overwhelming majority of fans, including Native American groups, has no problem with the continued use of Redskins as the team name. Should that change significantly (and it may in years to come), then those same fans may find themselves rooting for a team named the Washington Warriors, and that wouldn’t be so bad.


Trailblazer Pat Boone Turns 80!

Posted May 28, 2014 By Triad Today

Pat Boone
Like his pioneering great-great-great-great-grandfather Daniel, Pat Boone is a trailblazer in his own right.

  • He was the first singer to mainstream R&B into the pop charts.
  • He has sold over 45 million records, and has recorded more songs than even Elvis or the Beatles.
  • He once stayed on the pop singles chart for 220 consecutive weeks, something no other artist had done before or since.
  • He hosted his own television show, and never endorsed a product unless he believed in it.
  • He has appeared in over a dozen films. He runs his own record label. He has authored several books, the first of which was a number one best seller.
  • He is also a song writer, and penned the lyrics for the title song of the film Exodus.
  • Pat even has his own 24 hour internet radio station.

And, on June 1, Daniel Boone’s descendant turns 80 years old. I asked Pat how he stayed so healthy and youthful looking.

PB: I work out in the gym three to four afternoons a week. I swim three mornings a week, and I ride a bike to my office and back, which is about three miles. And I play tennis on Fridays, and golf whenever I can, so I really try to stay in aerobic good shape.

Pat is also keeping his instrument in shape. Just before we spoke, he had completed a voice lesson to help him tune up for his new album, titled, “Legacy”.

PB: My voice coach is Richard Fredericks, who sang at the Met. He’s affirming to me that I still have the same range, and he’s re-training me how to support the tone, because this new album is important to me.

That dedication to excellence has driven Pat his entire life. By age 12 he was competing regularly at Nashville’s Belle Meade Happiness Club talent show, and won repeatedly because he really wanted the top prize – a banana split. He was a straight “A” student, captain of his high school baseball team, and president of the student body. Then he became our nation’s original American Idol, winning Ted Mack’s Amateur Hour contest for three weeks in a row. He would have continued that streak except Mack wouldn’t let him return because, in the interim, Pat had appeared on Arthur Godfrey’s Talent Scouts TV show for money, thus voiding his amateur status. Not long afterward, the newly turned professional singer found himself atop the pop charts with one hit after another, and that led to a hosting gig on the Pat Boone Chevy Showcase.

Having succeeded in both music and television early on, Pat completed the hat trick by tackling feature films.

PB: In motion pictures I enjoyed taking on somebody else’s persona, who mostly looked and sounded like me, because I’m not John Gielgud. The characters I played bore a striking resemblance to me (laughs). I could experience things as someone else, and that was fun. But television was my favorite because it’s me being real, usually in front of a live audience. It’s improvisational and spontaneous.

Yet for all of the things Pat Boone is known for doing, he is also famous for two things which he didn’t do. He didn’t kiss Shirley Jones in the film “April Love”, and he turned down a chance to co-star with Marilyn Monroe. First, the kiss story.

One day while filming a scene atop a Ferris wheel, the director asked Boone and Jones to do an unscripted kiss.

PB: I never refused to kiss Shirley Jones, I simply asked the director, Henry Levin for a delay. I said, “Henry can we wait a little on this? This is just my second film, and I haven’t even talked with my wife Shirley about kissing scenes, and I just want to make sure it’s not going to be a problem with her.” And Henry thought it was funny, so he said, “OK, we’ll do it a little later in the film.” I went home and talked to Shirley and she said, “Look, I know if you’re going to do movies, there’s going to be kissing involved, but just make me one promise.” And I asked “What’s that,” and she said, “Promise you won’t enjoy it.”

Meanwhile Levin had spread the story around Hollywood, and suddenly the world press was reporting that Pat refused to kiss Shirley Jones.

PB: The mail came in from all over, some folks telling me to stick to my guns. But then there were letters from guys who said, “Hey, if you don’t want to kiss her, give me a ticket, and I’ll fly out and kiss her for you!”

When filming resumed there was never another opportunity for a passionate kiss, but last year at a retrospective of “April Love”, the two co-stars finally sealed the deal. There was, however, no such fairy tale ending to the Marilyn Monroe story.

PB: Marilyn and I were both under contract to 20th Century Fox, and we were both making hit movies, so the studio said, “Hey let’s team up Boone and Monroe.” It was a story about a slightly over-the-hill cabaret singer who goes back to a small town to re-group, and this young kid becomes infatuated with her, and they have an affair. It was like what’s happening today with students having sex with their teachers. The studio could smell the box office success.

But the smell went bad when young Pat told studio head Buddy Adler he couldn’t do the film.

PB: I said, “Mr. Adler, I’ve got millions of young fans and, like it or not, I have some influence over what they do. They tend to imitate me, even in the roles I play, so I can’t play a role in which it makes this affair between a kid and a woman OK.” And he said, “You know we can suspend you, and if we do, the other unions in music and TV will probably go along with it.” And I said, “I understand, and you have to do what you have to do, but I cannot play this role. Not that I wouldn’t love to do a movie with Marilyn, but not this story.”

The film was eventually released in 1963 without Monroe or Boone, and titled “The Stripper”, starring Joanne Woodward. Pat wasn’t blackballed right away, but later on, his moral and political beliefs would work against him in Hollywood.

PB: My being conservative has been a real detriment in my career. It has cost me film roles and guest spots on TV. I asked Pat if celebrities should refrain from being vocal about their personal views.

PB: Just because you’re a celebrity doesn’t mean you can’t be a citizen first. I have the same right as any other citizen to speak out. But because you’ve been given more influence, you better exercise more responsibility in what you say. You need to consider the consequences of things that you may espouse.

I don’t agree with some of Pat’s political views, but I respect the man for putting his career on the line time and again by sticking to his principals. It sort of puts you in mind of another courageous Boone.

I wondered if Pat thought his famous ancestor might have also been a good singer, as well as an accomplished frontiersman.

PB: I’ve never been asked that, but yeah, he must have been because he was out in the woods by himself for years (laughs). I mean he spent at least a quarter of his life alone,so I have a feeling he probably sang robustly.

And what does he think would have been old Daniel’s favorite Pat Boone song?

PB: Exodus. (he breaks into song) “This land is mine. God gave this land to me”.

Pat and I spent an hour on the phone, and then, not surprisingly, he had to leave for another activity – skydiving for all I know. The man is a perpetual motion machine, so I asked the obvious question.

JL: What’s the best thing about being eighty?

PB: That you’re still here (laughs).

Some of my friends can’t say that. In fact they can’t say anything. My wife Shirley and I have been married 60 years, and we made Moses our role model. He lived to be 120 years old.

If any man can blaze a trail to 120, it’s Pat Boone. Besides, Moses never went to the gym four days a week.

(For more on Pat’s life and career visit PatBoone.com.)


Michael Sam is No Jackie Robinson

Posted May 21, 2014 By Triad Today

Michael Sam, first openly gay football player to be drafted by the NFL
Earlier this month the St. Louis Rams selected University of Missouri defensive end Michael Sam in the 7th round of the NFL draft. He was the 249th overall pick, which means under normal circumstances, the media could care less. But these weren’t normal circumstances because Sam became the first openly gay player to be drafted by a National Football League team.

Some sports pundits and social commentators likened the selection of Sam to Jackie Robinson breaking the color barrier in Major League Baseball, but in my mind, the two momentous events aren’t even close.

In 1947, black men were still being lynched for looking at a white woman. Men of color couldn’t eat in certain restaurants, stay at most hotels, and were made to use separate restrooms from white men. And though many players in the famed Negro Leagues were superior athletes to their white counterparts, the chance of putting a black man in a white team uniform was as remote as putting a man on the moon.

Nevertheless, Brooklyn Dodgers president Branch Rickey could see the future, and he knew he could win more pennants if his team was integrated. Rickey carefully screened Negro League talent before settling on Robinson to be the subject of his grand experiment. Rickey warned Jackie that he would face daily insults and racial hate speech, then came the now famous dialogue between the two men in which Robinson reportedly said, “Are you looking for a Negro who is afraid to fight back,” to which Rickey replied that he was looking for a Negro player “with guts enough NOT to fight back.”

Sure enough, Jackie endured racial slurs and death threats, and the St. Louis Cardinal ball team even threatened to strike if Robinson took the field against them. Now, nearly 70 years later, another team in St. Louis has chosen to break down, not resist, another kind of social barrier by selecting a gay man to play pro football.

To be sure, prejudice, discrimination, and hatred toward gays still exist today. Thankfully, though, our nation is moving (slowly but surely) toward acceptance of comprehensive gay rights, and the vilest homophobia is increasingly limited to religious zealots. That makes Michael Sam’s battles much easier to endure than those of Mr. Robinson, who faced widespread racism. Still, Sam is now under a microscope, and, like it or not, he must realize that, like Robinson before him, his behavior must be professional and exemplary at all times. Jackie knew that his success would lead to more black players entering major league baseball, and Michael must surely know that the same is true for his impact on the future of gay players in the NFL. The problem is, he’s not acting like it.

Upon hearing that he had been drafted, the first thing Michael did was give his partner a long, passionate kiss in front of a worldwide audience. Then, to celebrate, Sam smeared something that looked like wedding cake all over his boyfriend’s face and proceeded to kiss and suck it off, again, with the world watching. These were the actions of a man who had just said he wanted to be thought of as a football player and not a gay football player. Well, good luck with that now.

The cake smearing incident went viral and became an indelible image in the minds of other NFL players, coaches, and owners – you know, the guys who Sam wanted to convince that gay players were no different from straight players? A few days later the other shoe dropped. Apparently without the knowledge of Rams executives, Sam cut a deal with Oprah to be the subject of a reality show, which would follow him around 24/7. Speculation is that had the Rams known of Michael’s deal with Oprah, they would not have drafted him, because the last thing they wanted is constant media frenzy disrupting the team. It should be noted that, only hours after I wrote this column, the Oprah Winfrey Network (OWN) rescinded their offer to produce a reality show about Mr. Sam. In a statement to the media, OWN President Eric Logan said that in postponing the reality show, his network was “allowing Michael the best opportunity to achieve his dream of making the team.” Translation? The Rams front office probably told Michael that his chances of making the team would be seriously compromised by the intrusion of cameras into his life and workplace. OWN made a mistake by offering the TV show to Michael, and Michael made a mistake by accepting their offer. The fact that the offer has been rescinded is moot.

Sam has demonstrated already that he is, at best, conflicted by his pledge to want equal treatment, and, at worst, is too immature to appreciate his place in history. Lord knows we need more tolerance not just in locker rooms, but also in living rooms and board rooms, but I fear that Michael Sam is the wrong man to advance that cause. If he is cut from the team now, we may never know if it’s because he lacks the requisite skills, or because the Rams are afraid he might keep sucking cake off of his partner’s face after every game, or continue to make deals with reality show producers who only want to exploit his sexual orientation. I hope he makes the team, but he hasn’t made it easy on himself.


Magic Matt is Masterful in The Normal Heart

Posted May 14, 2014 By Triad Today

Actor Matt Bomer
Matt Bomer happens to be one of America’s most popular and talented actors. He has played everything from a Texas Chainsaw victim, to a male stripper (“Magic Mike”), to a lovable con man (“White Collar”). The drop-dead gorgeous, Texas born, athlete turned thespian, also happens to be gay, and is a recipient of the Steve Chase Humanitarian Award for his work in the fight against HIV/AIDS. I got to know Matt when I moderated a Television Academy salute to TV Crime Fighters back in 2010, and we’ve remained friends ever since. I spoke with him recently about director Ryan Murphy’s upcoming HBO film, “The Normal Heart” in which he stars.

MB: There was nothing I had done on White Collar that would have ever told Ryan I could play this role, but when I brought my research to the role, he understood that I was passionate about being a part of the piece.

HBO’s “The Normal Heart” is based on Larry Kramer’s 1985 play by the same name, which recounts the early years when AIDS first reared its ugly head in America, and was referred to as “gay cancer”. In large part it is the story of how gay men from all walks of life dealt with this new epidemic, and how some of them came together through the Gay Men’s Health Crisis organization to raise awareness, and seek government funding for finding a cure.

In the film, Bomer plays Felix Turner, a reporter with the New York Times who becomes involved with GMHC founder Ned Weeks, played by Mark Ruffalo. Matt’s research for the role included shadowing Jacob Bernstein, a real life reporter for the Times, but his commitment went much further than that. Since Felix contracts Aids midway through the film, Matt decided to lose 40 pounds to give his portrayal a sense of realism.

MB: I think it was something I brought to Ryan, and he responded to it as my take on the arc of the character. Something that I thought was important to the reality of the piece. When I brought this aspect to him, in addition to my research, that might have been part of the reason I got the job.

But Bomer’s commitment to the role meant having to take a break in filming in order to transform his body into that of an AIDS patient.

MB: We filmed the first part of the movie in June and July, and then we came back at the beginning of November.

JL: But weren’t you concerned about the risks to your health as a result of the fasting?

MB: What I gained from this role, and getting to work in the film, is so much more valuable than what it cost my body.

Bomer definitely knows about taking risks. While still the star of his own prime time drama series, he came out at the 2012 Chase awards ceremony. The year before, he had quietly married Simon Halls, and they now have three beautiful children. Of course, Matt was just a child himself when Kramer’s play takes place, so I wondered if he could identify with the characters in the film.

MB: Absolutely. I think anybody who’s ever come out can identify with that in some regard. Because YOU don’t change, but the perspective of the way the world sees you, and the way other people see you, can change.

Kramer’s teleplay and Murphy’s interpretation allows us to see those changes in public perception, as well as the divisiveness and denial among gay men, in the face of a deadly new epidemic.

MB: You have to understand that at the time, everyone else was having a sexual revolution. Gay men and women felt they were having their own sexual revolution, and so, right as they’re starting to feel a sense of freedom in the post-Harvey Milk years, all of a sudden, doctors are telling them they can’t have sex anymore. One of the things I found so interesting in Ryan’s take and Larry’s script is that not everybody in the film was on the same team. There were lots of different points of view in the gay community. There were guys who thought it wasn’t safe to be “out” at work, and guys who thought everyone should be “out”. So there were a lot of different points of view. I think that lends much more authenticity to the film, and it wouldn’t have if everyone was just marching together in a parade.

Speaking of divisive, the film has come under fire from some in the gay community because two of the leading roles are played by straight actors, Mark Ruffalo and Taylor Kitsch (“Friday Night Lights”). I asked Matt if he had a problem with that.

MB: I think it’s about whoever is the most passionate about telling the story, and whoever is going to help serve the story. Mark and Taylor’s dedication and commitment to their roles, and to “The Normal Heart” were unparalleled, so I had absolutely no problem with them playing those roles.

“The Normal Heart” takes place in the early 1980s when we were just starting to understand AIDS, and yet, after all these years, and after all of the research, education, and breakthrough treatments, there are still 6,000 cases of HIV diagnosed every year. I wondered if Matt thought “The Normal Heart” is still a cautionary tale, and what he wanted audiences to take away from the film.

MB: I think for one generation it’s going to be therapeutic. For another generation, my generation, it’s going to offer some clarity. And, hopefully, for the younger generation it will teach them to be responsible with their lives, and it will give them an appreciation for the circumstances these people went through. I also hope it opens up people’s sense of compassion, so that the next time something like this comes up, we will know how to treat each other in a more humane, respectful, compassionate way.

“The Normal Heart” premieres Sunday, May 25th at 9pm on HBO.


The Geezer and the Grazer: Poster Boys for Racism

Posted May 7, 2014 By Triad Today

Rancher Cliven Bundy and Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling
The Rev. Martin Luther King dreamed of a time when a man would be judged by the content of his character rather than the color of his skin. I’m no interpreter of dreams, but I’m guessing that Dr. King expected all of the old white racists would eventually die off, and then racism would no longer exist. Well, that day must have finally come, because Chief Justice John Roberts justified gutting the Voting Rights Act by intimating that racism is dead in America. Unfortunately, the racists didn’t get Roberts’ memo.

Among them were Cliven Bundy and Donald Sterling.

Bundy became a media darling of the Tea Party when it became known that he refused to recognize the federal government. It seems that the 76-year old Nevada rancher has been letting his cattle feast off of public lands for more than two decades, and now owes his estranged Uncle Sam in excess of one million dollars in unpaid grazing fees.

Why FOX News and the far right made Bundy into a hero is beyond me, because by grazing his cattle for free, he’s essentially been on government welfare. Nevertheless, Bundy and his militia buddies armed themselves and sported American flags, so the Tea Party was totally on board. Last week, however, big mouth Bundy opened his pie hole one time too many, and out came a diatribe about how the “negro” would be better off under slavery. Hypocrite Bundy even complained that blacks were on government subsidy. Hey, nobody said he didn’t have balls. Speaking of which, one of Bundy’s minutemen threatened to cut off Senator Harry Reid’s jewels, and soon thereafter, the Feds launched an investigation into the militia.

To be truthful, no one with a functioning brain was surprised that an old white rancher and his militia buddies hate black people.

What was surprising to many of us, however, is that next door in California, the owner of the Los Angeles Clippers, who has spent decades hiring African-Americans and paying them millions of dollars, turned out to be a racist.

Billionaire owner Donald Sterling was caught on tape telling his girlfriend she was not to be photographed with black people, nor was she to bring any black people to Clippers games. Sterling’s racist rant went viral, and within a couple of days, the team had lost most of its major sponsors, including Virgin Air, Carmax, Mercedes Benz, Red Bull, and Kia, among others. Meanwhile, current and former NBA players called for Commissioner Adam Silver to take the Clippers away from Sterling, and if he didn’t mete out a severe enough punishment, they would boycott the playoffs.

League commissioner Silver then dropped the hammer on Sterling, issuing a lifetime ban, a $2.5 million fine, and pledging to force a sale of the Clippers. Unlike the Bundy incident, which is still under investigation, the NBA took swift and decisive action, and gave the nation some sense of temporary closure on an ugly chapter in the history of sports. But here’s the rub. Silver and most of the offended players already knew that Sterling was a racist, and a very bad guy to boot. In fact, Sterling has been in and out of court on numerous occasions including in his capacity as a slumlord, in which he was found guilty of denying housing to black and Hispanic applicants.

So there you have it. Last week, Cliven Bundy said that blacks would be better off as slaves, and at the same time the world realized that, sure enough, dozens of blacks who are “owned” by Sterling ARE better off, to the tune of millions of dollars per year each. Why these talented men of color would work for such a man is a disturbing aspect of this saga.

As for Dr. King’s dream, the good news is that both Bundy and Sterling are old men, and won’t be around much longer to spew their filth. The bad news is that it looks like racism will still be with us long after they’re gone. Just last week, a young female candidate for Senate likened minority food stamp recipients to animals, and last month, some frat boys from Georgia tied a hangman’s noose around the neck of a statue of James Meredith at Ole Miss. Somehow the poison spread by old racists is reaching and influencing young racists, and that is discouraging to say the least. We can only hope that the Feds will crack down hard on Bundy, and that the NBA’s severe punishment of Sterling will serve as a warning to young haters.


Lying is Legal in Politics

Posted April 30, 2014 By Triad Today

Solicitor General Donald Verrilli as Pinocchio
There’s only one politician in American history that supposedly never told a lie, and he earned his rep early on. According to legend and to children’s book author Bella Koral, when George Washington was about six years old, he chopped down one of his father’s prized cherry trees that had been shipped over from England. When asked, “George, do you know who chopped down my cherry tree?” the future Commander in Chief replied, “Father, I cannot tell a lie. I did it with my little hatchet.” Rather than become angry, young George’s father said, “That was my favorite tree, but I’d rather lose a thousand trees than have a son who lies.”

Washington went on to lead our nation into independence, establish a Bill of Rights, voluntarily set term limits, and, so far as we know, he never told a lie. How then did we go from being led by such an honest politician to being victimized by candidates who will say anything in order to get elected?

The fact is that lying in a political campaign has become commonplace. So much so that the Supreme Court is poised to rule that political lies are protected speech. Last week the high court heard arguments from U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli, and others, that an Ohio law that criminalizes lying in a political campaign is unconstitutional.

Currently, Ohio and 15 other states have made it illegal to communicate lies through political advertising, however, it seems that very few folks from either party are happy with those laws. The aforementioned Solicitor General, for example, who speaks for the Obama administration, has argued that lying in a political campaign is protected under the first amendment. Said Verrilli in defending political liars, “Petitioners have sufficiently alleged that a credible threat of prosecution will chill them from engaging in deceptive speech relating to elections for public office.” Are you kidding me? That’s like arguing that we shouldn’t make robbing a bank illegal because it would discourage criminals from stealing money. Mr. Verrilli has obviously never been the target or victim of political slander and libel. Many others have.

In the Fall of 2010, for example, the North Carolina GOP ran an attack ad against Democrat House Majority Leader Hugh Holliman, saying that the incumbent was soft on crime, and, “Thanks to Hugh Holliman, death row inmates can leave prison early and move in next door to you.” In fact, Holliman was tough on crime, supported the death penalty, and even attended the execution of the man who raped and murdered his daughter. But the damage had been done to Holliman’s reputation, and he lost the election. Fast forward to this year’s primary battle for the GOP 6th District nomination, and Bruce VonCannon is suing a PAC, which supports Phil Berger Jr., for running an ad that said VonCannon is a banker for the Chinese. Things never change.

I suppose it’s possible that the conservative Supremes will uphold Ohio’s law against lying, but it’s not likely. Failure to do so, however, will have a catastrophic effect on our society, as explained by AlterNet’s Eric Zuesse. “The idea behind this law is that any democracy in which lying in political campaigns isn’t penalized by severe penalties, won’t remain a democracy much longer, but will instead descend into a kleptocracy – the theft of elections themselves.”

SCOTUS has already allowed corporations and unions to donate huge sums of money to a single campaign, and the Court recently ruled that individuals can now donate the maximum amount of money to as many campaigns as they wish. Those decisions, coupled with a possible ruling to strike down the Ohio law, will give millionaires and billionaires free reign to shape the national conversation, and elect candidates who serve their interests.

Back in 2010, I called on State legislators and Congress to criminalize political lying, but only a handful of states have attempted some kind of reform. What’s lacking is federal oversight. If he wanted to, President Obama could create an inter agency commission consisting of the FEC, the FCC, and the FTA, which would govern, monitor, and penalize any campaign or candidate found guilty of transmitting lies through print, speech, or broadcast. After all, we already punish TV pitchmen who lie about their product (Kevin Trudeau just got ten years in prison for making false claims about his weight loss pills.) Of course, political hacks will argue that there’s a difference between lying about a weight loss pill and lying about a candidate, but there’s not. They are both products to be marketed and sold to the detriment of competing products, but that process should be done honestly. When it’s not, those responsible should be punished and chopped down to size. Alas, there’s never a boy with a hatchet around when you need him.


Black Bag Bagmen

Posted April 23, 2014 By Triad Today

Doctor's bag with dollar sign
I grew up in the 1950’s when times were simpler, and customer service was more personal.

Sealtest delivered milk and dairy products to our back door. The dry cleaner came and picked up clothes that needed special attention. Southern Foods delivered meat right to our freezer when we could afford it, and the local automobile dealer would even bring my Dad used cars to test drive every few years. And then there was the family physician.

Back then if you were sick, your doctor would make house calls. It was just like in Gunsmoke where Doc Adams would pay a visit to an ailing resident of Dodge City. And just like the doctors of the old west, our family medicine man showed up at our house carrying a little black bag. It contained all sorts of miraculous items, including pills which almost always cured what ailed us. We trusted our doctor to give us the right medicine because it was the right thing to do, and not because he had been paid to prescribe it. That was then and this is now.

Over the intervening years, most doctors have stopped making house calls, and their black bags have become stuffed with cash instead of cures. Last week the Greensboro News & Record published a report on doctors who accept money from pharmaceutical companies, and I was astonished to learn about the amount of green that was changing hands.

According to the report, Dr. Scott MacDiarmid, a urologist with Alliance Urology Specialists was paid nearly $609,000 between 2009 and 2012. His fees came from Allergan, Johnson & Johnson, and Pfizer. During that same period, Dr. Stephen Smith and Dr. Richard Aronson, both with Guilford Medical Associates, made $383,000 and $263,000 respectively from Eli Lilly, Merck, Forest, and Glaxo Smith Kline. There were plenty of other doctors receiving six figures for consulting, giving speeches, and, by implication, endorsing a particular brand of drug. Those included physicians from Eagle Family Medicine, Cone Health Cancer Center, and LeBauer Healthcare, among others.

I spoke with a local physician who told me that big pharma has always cozied up to large medical practices. In the beginning, he said doctors were paid to show up in Hawaii or some other exotic locale and do nothing to earn their kickback except kick back and get a tan. That raised some eyebrows and red flags, so, as time went on, those vacationing Docs were expected to deliver a speech in exchange for payment. Others were compensated for having conducted clinical trials ostensibly designed to bolster credibility of the industry sponsor’s product. Charles Ornstein, a reporter with Pro Publica, explained the problem, saying, “Patients trust their doctors to prescribe the right drugs for them and not be influenced by financial interests.” The bad news is that pay perks continue today. The good news is that they are not as pervasive as they once were.

According to Pro Publica, payments to physicians from pharmaceutical companies declined between 2011 and 2012, primarily due to increased transparency, and to drugs losing patent protection. The former is a result of the Physician Payment Sunshine Act, which now gives patients and the media unprecedented access to data regarding cash deals between doctors and the drug industry. Glaxo Smith Kline, for example, announced back in December that they would no longer pay doctors to make promotional speeches. However, GSK still compensates physicians to conduct clinical trials, a practice which has increased nationwide among many big companies. In fact, according to Pro Publica, over 1,300 researchers now have personal or promotional ties to drug companies.

Fortunately, most academic medical centers have adopted strict rules that govern the way clinical trials are conducted, and the kinds of speeches their doctors can deliver when being paid by a pharmaceutical company. Dr. John McConnell, CEO of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center shared with me his hospital’s conflict of interest policy which establishes specific guidelines. For example, Wake’s policy precludes its doctors from being involved in “any marketing program designed by an industry solely to influence purchasing or prescribing decisions.” Also, compensation or honoraria accepted by a doctor for delivering a speech “must be reasonable and reflect fair market rates.” Moreover, Wake physicians who deliver outside speeches can’t even use power point or slides provided by an industry sponsor. In addition, WFBMC has its own Conflict of Interest office that monitors and reports on industry funded presentations. And while such oversight by teaching hospitals is admirable, it is discouraging to know that so many area physicians in private practice are still accepting large sums of money from big pharma.

Old Doc Adams carried a black bag alright, but he wasn’t a bagman for drug companies. Truth is he never took a dime from anyone except for his patients, and often times not even from them. That’s because a good doctor thinks more of healing than he does of being well-heeled.


Mayors Meet on Triad Today

Posted April 16, 2014 By Triad Today

Mayor Joines of Winston-Salem with Mayor Vaughn of Greensboro
Greensboro Mayor Nancy Vaughan and Winston Salem Mayor Allen Joines had met briefly a couple of times, but not until last week had they ever been interviewed together. The pairing occurred when they stopped by the WXLV studio to tape an extended segment for Triad Today.

We covered a lot of ground during our twelve-minute session, beginning with a discussion about recent rumors that the drone industry was looking to locate in Greensboro or Winston Salem. Given public outcry about NSA spying, I wondered if the Mayors would welcome an industry that manufactures high tech, armed surveillance equipment.

Vaughan: We have not had any discussions with the drone industry at this point, so I’m not sure what plans they might have for Greensboro. We would like to bring economic development out to the airport, but I’m just not sure that’s the type of development we’re looking for.

Joines: Certainly we’re looking for jobs, and that’s a legal industry, but I think we would need to look at what the parameters of the investment might be.

Meanwhile, the Mayors touted two projects that are far from controversial. For Joines it’s the Innovation Quarter.

Joines: That’s one of our big economic engines. At 240 acres we think it’s the largest urban research park in the country. Right now we have over 3,000 people working there, and we have another 2,000 people living in and around the Quarter. We think within the next fifteen years we’ll have as many as 15,000 people working there.

For Vaughan, it’s the newly approved Performing Arts Center, which is slated to open by June of 2016.

Vaughan: I think it will be a huge economic catalyst. $30 million dollars will be tax payer funded, and $35 million dollars in private investment. It is significant that the private sector stepped up to make that kind of contribution to the community.

Vaughan’s pride over private sector funding was understandable, especially since here in the Triad, so much of our development involves incentives. Speaking of which, I wondered if the two Mayors would like to do away with incentives which mostly just shift jobs from one locality to another.

Vaughan: Unfortunately incentives are a necessary evil, and if you want to be in the game, you’ve got to play the game. If the federal government wanted to step forward and say ‘no more incentives anywhere’, and we all had to bid on jobs based on our own merits, that would be great. But until that happens, we’re going to have to look at some sort of economic incentives in order to be competitive.

Joines: I agree. If we stopped doing it, it would be like disarming ourselves unilaterally. However, the way we structure incentives is pay as you go, or pay to perform. And we use new taxes from that company to make incentive payments, so it’s not coming out of city coffers.

Then came the big news. Years ago Joines and then-Mayor Keith Holliday appeared on Triad Today together, and announced that they had a verbal agreement in place not to bid against each other when a company is threatening to move from Greensboro to Winston, or vice versa. I was encouraged to hear that Joines and Vaughan would carry on that tradition.

Joines: Yes that was a gentleman’s agreement that we don’t work against each other. If a company in Greensboro is trying to get us to make a proposal to try and get them to move to Winston-Salem, we always say no.

Vaughan: I would agree. Mayor Joines and I were at a conference last week which talked about regionalism and the importance of working together, and not against each other. Certainly it doesn’t serve any of us if we start driving the price up against each other.

Toward the end of the interview I asked Vaughan and Joines to talk about the most rewarding part of their job.

Joines: To me it’s seeing a project to completion, like the new ballpark.

Vaughan: For me it’s just being out in different communities and building relationships. I love local politics because that’s where you can have the biggest impact.

In fact, both Mayors have already had a big impact on their respective cities, and after speaking with them, it’s easy to see why.

They are honest, likeable, competent, and hard working. Most of all, they discharge their duties in a bipartisan manner. Those qualities have kept Joines in office for over a dozen years, and may do the same for Vaughan.

Vaughan: I would certainly like the ability to continue to serve a few more terms. The last couple of Mayors haven’t been quite so fortunate, so I hope that I’m going to break the jinx.

I’m pretty sure she will.


David Letterman’s Legacy

Posted April 9, 2014 By Triad Today

David Letterman in 2011
When he retires next year, David Letterman will have been at a late night desk for 33 years. That’s longer than anyone else, and it’s a record that will never be surpassed. But Dave wasn’t an overnight success. In fact, he spent the first half of his life preparing to host a late night show, and the last half actually doing it. His time in the wilderness included jobs as a DJ, TV weatherman, TV sitcom writer, ensemble cast member of a variety show, stand-up comedian, and host of a failed talk show that wasted his brand of wackiness on the wrong audience at the wrong time of day. In 1982, NBC corrected that mistake by giving Dave his own show at 12:30am, following Johnny Carson, the man he idolized and eventually wanted to replace. In the end, Carson lobbied for Dave, but NBC gave Jay Leno “The Tonight Show”, and Dave found a home at CBS.

Though Dave’s hero was Carson, it would be a mistake to say that he was solely a product of Carson’s style. In fact, Letterman is what I refer to as a hybrid pioneer of late night. His wacky stunts and lightning fast wit is all Steve Allen. My favorite Allen ad lib slipped out while he was interviewing a little girl, who said she liked to go to the beach. “What do you do at the beach”? asked Steve. “I dig,” said the girl. “I’m hip,” quipped Allen without a pause. Fast forward to last week, when Dave introduced a high school student who had been accepted to all eight Ivy League colleges. Dave looked into the camera, and as an afterthought said, “He’ll probably end up just going to four or five of them.” Pure Allen.

What Dave inherited from Carson was mastery of the wry comeback. Take for instance the night he tried to interview space cadet Joaquin Phoenix who showed up incognito. At the end of the segment Dave said, “I’m sorry you couldn’t be here tonight.”

Then there’s the gravitas of Dave which was handed down to him by Jack Paar and Dick Cavett. It’s a rare ability which served Letterman well immediately following 9/11. It let him know just when to return to the air, and just what to say when he got there. Dave also inherited Paar and Cavett’s intellectual curiosity, which he has demonstrated time and again when interviewing serious people about serious topics. Like last week, for instance.

That’s when former President Jimmy Carter visited the Ed Sullivan theatre to plug his new book, “A Call to Action: Women, Religion, Violence, and Power”, which details horrific abuses against women throughout the world. Within moments after the interview began, Dave had abandoned his notes, and engaged Carter in a lively, unrehearsed dialogue about how to combat abuse. He then wandered seamlessly into a discussion about everything from the Crimean conflict, to alternative sources of energy.

But Dave is also a master of timing, and knew when and how to break the tension of a serious conversation. At one point Carter mentioned that he has 12 grandchildren and nine great grandchildren, “21 in all” said Carter. “You have your own Congressional district, don’t you?” quipped Dave. And at the end of the interview, Dave lifted the mood by saying to the former President, “I thought you were going to be a lot funnier.” The Carter interview was vintage Letterman, and it’s why we watch him, because no other TV host in any time slot, on any channel, could have pulled it off with such aplomb.

Much has been written lately about how the new generation of late night hosts is taking younger viewers away from Dave, the same kind of viewers he had attracted in years past. But guess what? Back then, those viewers included the likes of Fallon, Kimmel, Meyers, Hall, Ferguson, Stewart, Colbert, and O’Brien, all of who have, in some way, copied or embraced the Letterman style. In that regard, Dave not only influenced those guys, he made it possible for them to carve out their own non-traditional niche within a very traditional genre.

Dave once said, “I can’t sing. I can’t dance, and I can’t act. So what else would I be but a talk show host?” Maybe so, but David Letterman turned out to be the most complete and best damn late night host in history, and that’s no small feat. Although I don’t know what the size of his “feat” have to do with anything.

Dave, I’ll miss you. You’re hip, and I dig.


Master Mimic Brings one Man Show to Piedmont

Posted April 2, 2014 By Triad Today

Rich Little performing as George Burns in 2004
I’ve interviewed hundreds of celebrities, but never all at once. That is, not until last week, when I spoke with Rich Little by himself. I phoned “The Man of a Thousand Voices” to talk about his career, and his upcoming one man show, “Jimmy Stewart and Friends”, which goes up Saturday April 19, at the Brock Performing Arts center in Mocksville.

Born in Ottawa, Ontario Canada, Rich discovered at an early age that he had a special talent for mimicry.

Rich: “I remember doing my homeroom teacher. I used to do all of my teachers when I was about fourteen. I was just doing it as a hobby, but I knew there was a future in it because it wasn’t long before the teachers were charging a two-drink minimum.”

But it was young Rich’s fascination with film legend James Stewart that eventually made him the world’s most famous impressionist.

Rich: “Jimmy Stewart was the first movie star I imitated. I saw The Far Country when I was about fifteen, and for two or three days after that, I was talking like Jimmy, and drove my parents crazy.”

Rich also tried to drive the girls in his high school crazy, but it didn’t always work out.

Rich: “I used to get dates by finding out who the girl’s favorite star was, and then calling her up as that star, and asking her for a date.

“Then I would show up, and she’d be disappointed.”

Undaunted, Rich kept doing voices, including during his stint as a DJ in Canada. Then came his big break on The Judy Garland Show. That was followed by regular appearances on TV variety shows, talk shows, and sitcoms. He even had his own series, The Rich Little Show.

He also guest starred on dramatic series like Mannix, and Murder She Wrote. But my favorite Rich Little appearance came in 1996 when he did a cameo as Johnny Carson in The Late Shift. It was a bravura performance because he played the iconic character straight.

Rich: “It was great that I was able to do that because most producers think of me as just a comic. They say, “Well he does characters funny, but I don’t think he can do them straight”, and that’s not true.”

Little is also renown for serving as emcee at various benefits and roasts, and has imitated a number of Presidents with them in attendance.

Rich: “Sinatra had a benefit and asked me to be on it, and Gerald Ford was sitting in the audience, right below the stage. I had the podium made out of cork so I could trip like Ford and break it. But that night I hit the podium so hard that it shattered into a million pieces, and I fell off the stage and landed in Gerald Ford’s lap. I put the microphone up to his mouth, and he went, “Oops”.”

These days, Little maintains a grueling schedule, including traveling throughout the country to hone his Broadway-bound show. I wondered what he did to keep his voice in shape.

Rich: “If I’m tired, my voice isn’t as good, although it’s deeper, so some of the voices actually improve when I’m tired – like Johnny Cash or John Wayne. But generally speaking it’s better to be well-rested because the voice is stronger.”

Today, Rich’s voice is stronger than ever, and that’s good, because he performs over 30 different characters in “Jimmy Stewart and Friends”. Speaking of which, I asked him how he decided to develop a show around Stewart.

Rich: “The Jimmy Stewart thing came about because I knew him better than anyone I impersonated. I spent a lot of time with him, and I remember telling him that I had this idea of doing a one-man show on his life. And he said (uses Stewart voice) ‘Rich, I don’t think you should do that. I don’t think that would go over well at all’. And I asked, ‘Why not?’ And he said, ‘For one thing, the way I talk, your show would be about four hours long’.”

Jimmy Stewart and Friends is not four hours long, but if it were, I’d still want to see it. If you want tickets to see Rich perform on April 19, visit daviearts.org or call (336) 751-3000.

You’ll hear a lot of famous characters that night, except for maybe one.

Rich: “I’m still working on President Obama. I’m having trouble doing him. Of course, he’s having trouble doing himself right now.”