Commentaries Archive


WFMY’s Larry Audas Signs Off

Posted April 9, 2024 By Triad Today

Larry Audas is a natural-born broadcaster. In fact, I suspect that a boom microphone and TV monitor were suspended above his baby crib.

Born in Dayton, Ohio, Larry grew up in the Chicago area, and later graduated from Bob Jones University with a B.A. in — you guessed it — “Radio & TV Production.” Afterward, Larry worked as an announcer at KQCV radio in Oklahoma City, and as a reporter for KFOR-TV there. Next stop was KPRC in Houston where he won a slew of awards as an anchor, and for his stellar news reporting. Later, in Columbia, South Carolina he won an EMMY for Most Outstanding Newscast, as well as an Edward R. Murrow award. As an anchor for KTHV in Little Rock, Arkansas, Larry won an EMMY for best newscast, and then was promoted to the front office as president and general manager of the station. He remained in that position until 2011 when he accepted a call to be president and GM of WFMY-TV in Greensboro.

During Larry’s tenure at WFMY the station has consistently been recognized for excellence in news programming. More importantly, Larry is responsible for WFMY winning the North Carolina Association of Broadcasters prestigious Community Involvement Award. One reason? His EMMY-winning “Read 2 Succeed” campaign which reached 100,000 urban elementary students with a compelling literacy message. Larry also launched WFMY+, a streaming channel designed to make news and entertainment programming more accessible to a wider audience.

I first met Larry when he appeared on “Triad Today” back in October of 2012, and we have stayed in touch regularly ever since. As an alumnus of WFMY, I share a common bond with Larry, but we also share a common belief that local television stations have an obligation to meet the needs of the communities they serve.

Larry recently announced that he is retiring from WFMY on April 30, so I thought this would be the perfect time to talk with him about his career.


Jim: Who or what led you to a career in broadcasting?

Larry: As a high schooler I was invited to serve as the announcer for our church’s weekly gospel TV program which was broadcast on a UHF station in Chicago. That fueled my interest in television and specifically newscasting.

Jim: Your booming voice made you a great announcer, but you really distinguished yourself as a news anchor and reporter. Yet for all that talent, you ended up as an executive. Did you always have your eye on broadcast management?

Larry: I never looked at management as a target, and as an anchorman I said, “I’d never be a news director.” But of course, when opportunity knocked, I became a news director. It is the most challenging role in any TV station, exceeding the pressure that seems obvious to those presenting on camera. I learned this first-hand. After that, I served as president and general manager for TV stations in Alabama, Arkansas, North Carolina, and Tennessee. The lesson here is “never say never.”

Jim: How did your background as a broadcast journalist help you become an effective general manager?

Larry: In the past, most GM’s destined for leadership moved from sales into the corner office. It was uncommon for news anchors and journalists to ascend to station management. Having covered seemingly every kind of news story from hurricanes and earthquakes to jetliner crashes, national political conventions, and sports championships, I was afforded a close-up understanding of what we delivered to viewers and why broadcasting was relevant. That knowledge was foundational as I moved into GM leadership.

Jim: How has local TV news changed since you started out?

Larry: Broadcast TV is still a vital and sometimes singularly local source of what is going on in your backyard, across the street, and in your town. Big Tech — the social media and platform companies that aggregate news and pump it to your phone or device have captured much of the revenue market as they deliver digital content. That financial aspect of nationalized content delivery is pressing local broadcast news hard. Young people and many not-so-young folks look to their phones for news. We’re there too, but what you see on an app may or may not be local, verifiable, and vetted. It would be a tragedy for local TV to follow newspapers in terms of diminished opportunity. I think Big Tech’s pipe dream is for viewers to pay for any and all fresh content. Imagine a day when you will pay, for example, to watch March Madness, the Super Bowl, or other currently free programs. We may learn the hard way that big content is not better.

Jim: Every TV station used to have a public affairs department, and air a variety of local programs in addition to News. Deregulation and corporate ownership have changed all that. How then has WFMY been able to maintain a community connection in today’s broadcast environment?

Larry: WFMY News2 has a historic place in this community and is celebrating a 75th anniversary. Part of that history is an ongoing community orientation and connection. It is seen most often in our news coverage and also in our true commitment to advancing the greater good in Greensboro and the Triad. Food and blood drives, legal help, problem solving for regular folk, and more, are part of both news and community efforts. We take pride in being part of, but also supporters of the people who live here with us.

Jim: Circling back to your comments about delivery systems, an increasing number of consumers are “cutting the cable.” How has that affected WFMY’s traditional viewership?

Larry: It’s called viewer fragmentation. That’s a fancy way of saying that viewers have dozens if not hundreds of choices when it comes to platforms, programming, and technology.

Long gone are the days when newspaper, TV, and radio ruled the roost. We have adjusted and you’ll find WFMY online, digital, streaming, and every other place where programming is distributed.

Jim: Do you ever miss reporting and anchoring?

Larry: Yes, but not with regret. I believe God opens and closes doors, and having been both a journalist and in leadership roles is more than I deserve.

Jim: What will you be doing with your time now?

Larry: To make sure I stay out of my wife’s way I will launch TruFlex Media, a consulting business. I’ll be available to consult, mentor, and speak with those in our profession who I would hope to help. (www.truflexmedia.com)

Jim: One last thing. This fall will be my 50th anniversary of getting a job at WFMY. Are you retiring now just to avoid giving me a gold watch?

Larry: This is exactly correct. The expense of a gold watch for a journalist of your stature and local fame was a chief contributor to my exit. I’m leaving that warranted, but pricey necessity to my successor.



 

 
 


NBC Makes Brief, but Shameful Hire

Posted April 2, 2024 By Triad Today

Television networks have been broadcasting nightly news programs since 1948, and while the length of those programs varied, they all had one thing in common — a sense of journalistic integrity in which anchors and reporters presented factual news of the day without personal comment or opinion. Certainly programs like “Meet the Press” and “Face the Nation” allowed network journalists to interview newsmakers who expressed opinions, but those guests were neither paid by the networks, nor did they ever try to overthrow the government.

In 1980 Ted Turner launched CNN, the world’s first 24/7 all-news channel and, like the big three networks, his anchors and reporters stuck to covering the news, not making it. Two years later Turner carved out a regular time slot on CNN for “Crossfire,” television’s first talk show where two professional journalists debated issues. Unfortunately, within a couple of decades CNN started integrating the debate format into every news hour. Suddenly their news anchors were allowed to express opinions, and instead of just reading the news, they also moderated a discussion among journalists and political operatives, some of whom were paid to appear. Nevertheless, those panelists, while often politically biased, were not allowed to traffic in lies or hate speech. That news industry paradigm shifted radically late last month when NBC announced the hiring of Ronna McDaniel as a “political analyst.”

McDaniel had served as chairperson of the Republican National Committee since 2017 and was a Trump loyalist until the former president recently ousted her to make way for new leadership, including North Carolina GOP Chair Michael Whatley and Trump’s daughter-in-law Laura. That left McDaniel without a job, but not for long. Almost immediately NBC came knocking at her door. The Peacock network’s decision would have been OK had McDaniel possessed a moral compass and some modicum of credibility, but she brought neither with her to the new job.

Upon hearing of McDaniels’ hiring, NBC Chief Political Analyst Chuck Todd said, “There’s a reason a lot of journalists at NBC are uncomfortable with this.” That was an understatement. Todd noted that McDaniel had engaged in “gaslighting” and “character assassination” when dealing with the news media. But that wasn’t the worst of it. Among other things, McDaniel directly participated in Trump’s illegal scheme to overturn the 2020 election. As a result, she was a party to obstruction and her lies were a catalyst to the attack on our Capitol, which she never condemned, UNTIL she signed on with NBC.

Suddenly McDaniel began to back pedal on her support for Trump’s “big lie” and the January 6 insurrection. Speaking with NBC’s Kristen Welker, McDaniel said, “When you’re the RNC chair, you kind of take one for the whole team. Right now, I get to be a little bit more myself.” No one was buying her flippant attempt to revise history.

MSNBC anchor Nicole Wallace let her bosses know that hiring McDaniel was “nothing short of a potential threat to democracy.” Said Wallace, “NBC News is either wittingly or unwittingly teaching election deniers that what they can do stretches well beyond appearing on our air to peddle lies about the sanctity and integrity of our elections.”

NBC brass had heard enough, and within days of hiring McDaniel, they fired her. Oddly enough, the most accurate assessment of the debacle came from McDaniels’ former boss. Writing on Truth Social, Donald Trump said, “Wow! Ronna McDaniel got fired by Fake News NBC. She only lasted two days, and this after McDaniel went out of her way to say what they wanted to hear.”

I suppose that NBC news executives can be praised for canning McDaniel, but even their swift reversal was too little too late. The damage to the network’s credibility had already been done. Their initial decision was hasty and ill-advised. Moreover, their bean counter mentality led them to believe that ratings and ad revenues would increase by simply giving a platform to someone who could attract a large number of radical insurrectionist viewers. Their logic was unsound. Sadly, so was their judgment.

 
 


Dangerous Nut Jobs Hope to Run Our State

Posted March 26, 2024 By Triad Today

Much has been written about the mental health of Donald Trump, including a book by over two dozen leading psychiatrists who concluded that Trump is a dangerous, sociopathic narcissist (for example, just last week Trump said, “If I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath in this country”). In “The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump,” Dr. Bandy Lee compiled reports by 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts who conducted in-depth studies of Trump’s actual words and actions and warned that his sickness and toxic behavior is contagious in that he has an ability to inspire cult-like characteristics of his followers. In a sense, these respected health professionals warned us about January 6, four years before it happened.

Today that cult is comprised of tens of millions of registered voters who still believe the myth that Joe Biden did not win the 2020 election. Aside from voters, Trump also controls elected officials, and not just on the federal level. His cult includes down ballot candidates, two of whom are seeking high office here in North Carolina. Lt. Governor Mark Robinson is running for governor, and Michele Morrow is running to become State Superintendent of Public Instruction. I’m no psychiatrist, but based on their words and positions we should all be very afraid at the prospect of these two folks winning in November.

Michele Morrow

Just in terms of job qualifications alone, Morrow comes up short for several important reasons: She’s never taught in a public school; she has no training in school administration; and, Morrow refuses to enroll her own kids in public schools, so she home-schools them. And while her lack of experience is concerning, it’s Morrow’s distorted belief system and violently demented statements that should send shivers up the backs of every North Carolinian.

A recent report by CNN’s Andrew Kaczynski revealed a number of disturbing comments, posts, and tweets that Ms. Morrow has made over the past few years. For example, she once posted a doctored photo of Obama strapped to an electric chair, and she also tweeted the following:

“I prefer a pay-per-view of him in front of a firing squad. I do not want to waste another dime supporting his life. We could make some money back from televising his death.”

In January of 2021, she warned that Chinese troops were on their way to Washington to make sure Biden was inaugurated. Morrow tweeted: “Tens of thousands of Chinese soldiers are already in Canada and probably Mexico waiting for orders to invade.”

And at the height of the COVID pandemic, Morrow called Biden a traitor for asking Americans to wear a mask, then said we should kill all traitors.

Morrow also believes that celebrities harvest the blood of children, that Muslims are evil, that COVID vaccines are population control, and that public schools are nothing but indoctrination centers where she claims preschoolers are being taught that men can get pregnant, and that lessons on racial equity would make students hate our country (Huffpost, March 6, 2024). All this is a bit strange for someone who wants to oversee the public education of 1.3 million North Carolina students. But if Morrow’s candidacy isn’t disconcerting enough for you, just examine the philosophies of this year’s GOP nominee for governor.

Mark Robinson

After his 2018 gun rights rant to Greensboro City Council went viral, Mark Robinson, a Black conservative who worked in furniture manufacturing, became an instant celebrity and darling of the Trump cult. That propelled him to win the lt. governor’s race which gave him an even bigger platform on which to spew his wild theories and hate speech.

Not surprisingly Robinson is an election denier and a climate change denier. He wants to remove science and social studies curriculum in first through fifth grades (WRAL). When speaking to a church in 2021, he said, “There’s no reason anybody anywhere in America should be telling any child about transgenderism, homosexuality, any of that filth (CBS 17).” He claimed the movie Black Panther was produced by satanic Marxists (Raleigh News & Observer). In a Facebook post last year Robinson wrote that the holocaust “is a bunch of hogwash” (News & Observer). And while speaking to Republican Women of Pitt County in 2020, Robinson said, “I absolutely want to go back to the America where women couldn’t vote.” He once called survivors of the Parkland school massacre, “spoiled little bastards” (CNN), and said that mass shootings are “karma for abortion (Media Matters for America).” And while claiming to be a law and order candidate, Robinson told a crowd in Naples Florida that, “If the FBI comes knocking at your door, it’s time to stand up and fight (CNN).”

So there you have it folks. One candidate wants to shape the minds of our children while advocating for the execution of politicians, and another wants to be the governor of all people, yet hates most of them. Together they are garnering national media attention for their dangerous brand of looniness while making North Carolina into a laughing stock among Americans who possess a brain and a sense of decency.

Paraphrasing a line from the film, Hoosiers, “There are two kinds of crazy. The guy that gets naked and barks at the moon, and the guy who does the same thing in my living room. The first one don’t matter. The second one you’re forced to deal with.”

This year Robinson and Morrow are barking at the moon in our living room, and there is only one way to deal with them. Vote for their Democratic opponents before the Chinese army invades us from Canada.

 
 


Political Parties: Three’s a Crowd?

Posted March 19, 2024 By Triad Today

Despite the dominance of America’s two-party system, our history of Presidential elections is replete with minor party candidates who challenged the front-runners, and, in some instances, directly affected the outcomes. Such was the case in 1912, 1992, and 2016.

1912

Vice President Theodore Roosevelt ascended to the Presidency in 1901 when William McKinley was assassinated. Teddy served out that term and ran successfully for the top spot in 1904. In 1908 he supported his Secretary of War, William Howard Taft who served one full term before he and Teddy had a falling out. That’s when Roosevelt decided to run for President on the Bull Moose Party ticket against Taft and Democrat Woodrow Wilson. Teddy finished second and spoiled Taft’s re-election bid.

1992

A similar scenario occurred in 1992 when Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton ran against GOP incumbent George H.W. Bush. Billionaire businessman Ross Perot jumped into the race as a third-party candidate, and for several months was leading in the polls. Perot dropped out over security concerns for his family, then re-entered the race late in the contest. Perot finished third, but his 19% of the vote knocked Bush out of a second term.

2016

In 2016, former Senator and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was heavily favored over Donald Trump, but several minor party candidates, including Libertarian Gary Johnson and Green Party nominee Dr. Jill Stein, siphoned critical votes away from Hillary in the rust belt, and it was enough to cost Hillary the electoral votes in those states. Though Clinton ran a poor campaign, she still blames Stein for handing the White House to Trump.

In each of these three cases, a third-party candidate successfully spoiled the election (or re-election) of the favored candidate, and that brings us to 2024.

As of this writing, Joe Biden is trailing Trump in every major poll, meanwhile, several groups and high rollers have pledged to do whatever they can to make sure Donald never sets foot in the Oval Office again. Among those is Republican Voters Against Trump, which is planning to spend 50 million dollars on anti-Trump ads. RVAT leader Sarah Longwell told The Hill that the group’s plan is to “Target moderate Republicans and Republican-leaning voters in swing states.”

Meanwhile, several independent party candidates have entered the fray including Robert Kennedy, Jr. who Democrats fear will throw the election to Trump.

And then there’s the bipartisan No Labels Party, whose founding chairman is former Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman, and whose national co-chairs are civil rights icon Dr. Ben Chavis (a Democrat) and former North Carolina Governor Pat McCrory (a Republican). I spoke with Pat recently to learn more about No Labels and its strategy.

Jim: Why was No Labels founded?

Jim: No Labels is about to select a bipartisan ticket to run for President and Vice President this fall. Many Democratic leaders say such a ticket will hurt Biden and return Trump to the White House.

Pat: Our surveys show a No Labels ticket will impact Trump and Biden equally.

Jim: The last time a third-party candidate fared well in a Presidential election was Ross Perot in 1992 who ended up with 19% of the vote, but failed to win a single electoral vote.

Pat: Perot was leading Bush and Clinton at 35% before he quit campaigning. At that time, 40% of voters did not want either Bush or Clinton. Today, almost 70% of voters do not want a Trump/Biden re-match of 2020.

Jim: OK, but is No Labels trying to win an election or just trying to make a point?

Pat: We will only field a ticket if we believe there’s a chance to win.

Jim: Do you have a bipartisan ticket in mind?

Pat: I’m not ready to discuss names just yet.

Jim: Potential candidates like Joe Manchin and Niki Haley have declined to join the No Labels ticket.

Pat: There is a tremendous amount of pressure from political parties and super PACs on potential candidates not to run or else they, their donors, and political operatives will be canceled. The two major parties are trying to protect their power and money.

Recent history tells us that a crowded field of candidates favors Donald Trump because it lowers his threshold for victory, and because third-party candidates tend to hurt Democrats more than Republicans. On the other hand, a strong ticket from No Labels might make history and alter that dynamic. The question is, are a majority of Americans ready to break with tradition and elect a third-party candidate as President? We won’t know the answer until November.

 
 


The Sick Leave Dilemma

Posted March 12, 2024 By Triad Today

When it comes to communicable diseases, Americans seem to catch everything except a break. For nearly four years we struggled to prevent and deal with COVID-19, and just as we thought we had the deadly virus under control, the CDC reports that nearly 1 in 5 Americans who had COVID now struggle with chronic “Long COVID” symptoms. To make matters worse, the good old-fashioned flu and its cousin RSV have entered 2024 with a vengeance. In fact, according to the CDC, 38 states are dealing with either a high or very high level of respiratory illness. Nationwide there have been more than 7,000 deaths this flu season, including 266 here in North Carolina (source: NCHHS). And, even folks with less serious respiratory illnesses are experiencing recovery times of several weeks. It’s enough to make you want to call in sick, but if you do, don’t count on receiving a paycheck.

According to a report by BambooHR.com, the United States is one of only four nations that do NOT guarantee paid sick leave. The other three are India, South Korea, and Somalia.

It sounds like a sick joke, but here in the good old U.S.A., only “unpaid” sick leave is guaranteed. That’s the bad news. The good news is that according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 77% of private industry employees have access to a limited amount of paid sick leave. The problem is that we’re not using sick leave as we should, or as we used to.

In the not-so-olden times, we stayed home from work if we had a bad cold or the flu. Not anymore. According to the CDC, 89% of all U.S. employees work while sick. There are a number of reasons for this phenomenon. For one, some folks who have access to paid sick leave don’t want to use it all up during early winter, just in case they might need time off later in the year. Still, others can’t afford to take “unpaid” sick leave at any time. Another reason is that the pandemic changed the dynamic of calling in sick and staying home from work.

When COVID was raging and our governor ordered people to shelter at home, most employers welcomed remote work as a way of keeping their business afloat. And even if employees contracted a mild case of COVID, which only required rest at home, then they could still keep up with their work, and communicate via Zoom. But there’s a fly in the ointment. A lot of people still work at home, either full or part-time, and as the Greensboro News & Record’s LZ Granderson observed, “It’s harder for folks who work remotely to justify using a sick day…how do you tell your supervisor you can’t work from home while ill, when we all just saw civilization work through a global pandemic?”

Fortunately, there is a simple way to manage this balancing act, and that is to avoid getting sick in the first place. I know that sounds idiotic, but folks who have limited or no paid leave can simply do what we were all asked to do during the pandemic: wear a mask around large crowds, and practice social distancing. It’s easy to do and produces no side effects. As someone who catches colds and flu easily, I can tell you from personal experience that while wearing a mask and social distancing during the pandemic, I wasn’t sick once, nor did I miss a single day of work.

No doubt sick leave (especially paid leave) is a good thing to have in your back pocket if you need it, but a little bit of caution and common sense can keep the doctor away altogether. Not long ago, a number of medical and media pundits predicted that once the pandemic had subsided, we’d have to adjust to a “new normal.” Perhaps having to protect ourselves on a daily basis is what they meant.

 
 


Physician Assisted Suicide an Unalienable Right?

Posted March 5, 2024 By Triad Today

In our Declaration of Independence, we Americans are guaranteed certain rights, including the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. However, the Founding Fathers said nothing about our right to die. Loosely interpreted, though, one could assume that “pursuit of happiness” inherently includes the right to end our own suffering. The problem is that most state legislatures don’t buy that interpretation.

Several weeks ago, the Minnesota legislature held hearings on whether to legalize physician-assisted suicide. The bill, which had been under consideration for nearly 10 years, would allow adults to obtain drugs that would end their own life if they are suffering with a terminal illness and “have less than six months to live.” Minnesota native Nancy Unde, who has terminal brain cancer, supports the bill, telling the Associated Press that she “wants the right to choose a peaceful, painless death on her own terms.”

Currently, 10 states permit physician-assisted suicide (PAS). They are: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington. The District of Columbia also allows PAS. Oregon was the first state to legalize physician-assisted suicide back in 1994. That came just four years after Dr. Jack Kevorkian’s first public assisted suicide, for which he was charged with murder. Charges were later dropped by a Michigan judge because Kevorkian had broken no specific law.

The law finally caught up with Kevorkian after 60 Minutes broadcast a videotape of “Dr. Death” administering a lethal injection to a terminally ill man. Even though the patient gave his consent, Kevorkian was convicted of second-degree murder and sentenced to eight years in prison. Following his death in 2011, public sentiment seemed to soften to the idea of physician-assisted suicide, still, none of the 40 other states are rushing to legalize this controversial procedure. The question is, why?

According to a Gallup poll, 68% of Americans say doctors should be legally allowed to assist their patients in committing suicide. But as we know, laws don’t always follow public sentiment. In this case, there are a number of powerful factions who oppose legalization. One is the Catholic Church which, according to the Catholic News Agency, says, “Intentional euthanasia, whatever its forms or motives, is murder.” Others who oppose making physician-assisted suicide legal are members of the medical profession who believe that offering to help a patient die goes against their code of healing and pledge to do no harm.

Beyond that, there are also medical reasons not to support physician-assisted suicide. One is that medications used in the procedure don’t always work. The Oregon Health Authority conducted a study of 1,857 patients who engaged in legal euthanasia and seven of them regained consciousness. Another reason is faulty data given to patients. A study by the University of Chicago, for example, found that only 37% of terminally ill patients receive an accurate diagnosis of their survival time, something that can affect a dying patient’s decision on when (or if) to take his own life.

The fact is that most healthcare providers prefer to let patients spend their last months under hospice care, which is designed to ease suffering through medications and maintain quality of life for as long as possible. This is the route my parents took and, though terminally ill, Mom and Dad cherished the time they had left, and spent it with loved ones. But as much as I support the path that my parents chose, I also believe that every person has the right to take his or her own life in order to ease their pain and suffering from a terminal disease. It is my hope that our state legislature will eventually legalize physician-assisted suicide, and recognize our unalienable right to die.

 
 


Congressional Candidates on Triad Today

Posted February 27, 2024 By Triad Today
Triad Today logo

Five Republican candidates for Congress in the new 6th district will be interviewed on Triad Today in a special voter education episode which will air this Saturday and Sunday.

Five GOP candidates for North Carolina's 6th congressional district in 2024. Left to right: Christian Castelli, Mary Ann Contogiannis, Jay Wagner, Addison McDowell, Mark Walker
There are six candidates registered for the March 5 Republican primary. Pictured left to right, they are: Christian Castelli, a combat veteran and business owner; Dr. Mary Ann Contogiannis, a plastic surgeon; former High Point Mayor Jay Wagner; former insurance lobbyist Addison McDowell; former Congressman Mark Walker, and (not pictured) attorney Bo Hines, the only one who declined to participate in the special.

Democrat Kathy Manning is not seeking re-election after the Republican-controlled state legislature re-drew map boundaries to favor a GOP candidate in the new district, which now includes southwest Guilford, southern Forsyth, northwest Cabarrus, Davie, Davidson and Rowan counties, High Point, Kernersville, and Walkertown.

Each of the five Republican candidates was given 5 minutes to talk about their personal and professional background, why they want to serve in Congress, and what their top priorities would be if elected. Here are excerpts from those conversations.


Jim: What about your personal or professional background prepares you to serve in Congress?

Wagner: I’ve spent the last eleven years serving the city of High Point, five on City Council, and six as Mayor, and I’ve had a very successful record of economic development.

McDowell: I spent four years working with Senator Ted Budd in his district office, and that includes much of the new 6th district, so I got to know the problems that the folks in this district have with navigating the bureaucracy of the federal government.

Contogiannis: My parents immigrated from Greece. We always went to church together. They taught us to love family, love God, and love our country. That was a moral compass for me in my life.

Castelli: I spent 22 years serving this great country, the Army provided me with a tremendous civilian and military education.  It taught me leadership, decision making and problem solving, and there’s no shortage of problems in our government that need to be solved today.

Walker: Knowing this community, serving this community, 16 years as a pastor, 16 years as a member of Congress, and closing over 1,800 veterans’ cases. We don’t talk about it that much because now it’s all about who has the largest social media profile, but this is still a position about serving your community, something we’re very proud of.


Jim: If elected, what problems or priorities would you want to tackle first?

Contogiannis: The most important one is closing our border.

Wagner: One party wants to shut the border down, and the other wants to manage the inflow, so I think we have to have a very serious discussion about what the policy should be and then be able to act on that.   

Walker: It’s reached a point where it has to be resolved very quickly. There were about 300,000 illegal immigrants who came across our border in the month of December alone, and those are just the ones we know about. 

Castelli: We have a border crisis of epic proportions. Some would lead you to believe that illegal immigration is a victimless crime, and that is absolutely false.

McDowell: We have to secure the border, and for me it’s a personal thing.  Today would have been my little brother’s 28th birthday, and we lost Luke to fentanyl that was likely manufactured in China and smuggled up through Mexico.


Jim: Should the federal government regulate social media and the internet, the same way it does with TV and radio?

Contogiannis: I know there needs to be regulation. The right vehicle is something to be determined, but yes, it needs to be regulated.

Walker: I think we’ve reached a place where we have to. There are countless issues we’re seeing with young folks and even adults who social media has consumed, but also it has created a place for racketeering and trafficking the way it’s utilized.  The bad guys are always going to use any kind of medium, so I think government has a role in making sure we have stop gaps for protection.

McDowell: Our children are facing a crisis, and I care about my daughter and I care about what she sees.    

Wagner: I think that’s something we have to look at, but we also can’t escape the fact that parents have some responsibility for what their children are doing. You can’t allow your kids to do things and not supervise what they’re doing, and then blame the government because they’re not regulating it.


Jim: Do you support term limits for members of Congress?

Wagner: Yes, I’ve signed a pledge to limit my terms and I did that as Mayor. I served six years, and I chose not to run again. 

Contogiannis: There is a point where people are there just too long and get entrenched in things. The most important thing is that voters can vote them in or out.  If you’re not doing a good job, then voters can take care of it.

Walker: We were blessed to be in leadership pretty quickly on, but it takes some time to navigate in a way you feel like you’re serving your community. But I do not approve of any situation where this is a lifelong job. It was never designed that way by our founding fathers.

Castelli: I have no desire to be a career politician. I am a soldier and I want to go up there and do a tour of duty in Washington and get things moving in the right direction.



 

This special edition of Triad Today airs Saturday at 7:30am on abc45, Sunday at 11am on MY48, and streams on WFMY+.

 
 


HanesBrands Sticks It to Us Again

Posted February 20, 2024 By Triad Today
The front of HanesBrands headquarters building in reverse color

The front of HanesBrands headquarters building in reverse color
Earlier this month HanesBrands announced that it was eliminating another 159 jobs in Winston-Salem. The key phrase here is “another.” That’s because, over the past 14 years, the once great community-oriented company has been about the business of decimating our community.

In 2006, HanesBrands employed nearly 5,000 people in Forsyth County. That was the year the company split from Sara Lee, and CEO Rich Noll promised, “HanesBrands will always be a major employer in Forsyth County and have a strong community presence here.” But a not-so-funny thing happened right after Noll made that promise. Between 2007 and 2009, Noll closed 30 plants in the United States and began moving his workforce offshore. In 2007, for example, HanesBrands employed 350 people in China. By 2009, that number had risen to over 6,000.

Meanwhile, the Great Recession of 2008 gave Noll a perfect smokescreen for continuing his campaign to send local jobs overseas. In May of 2009, Noll announced that he was closing the Stratford Road and Weeks plants in Winston-Salem, and laying off 440 workers. By year’s end, he had also eliminated subsidized medical benefits for retirees, leaving thousands of people without adequate medical coverage. Said Noll, the closures were caused by, “reduced consumer spending during a bleak economy.” Local business leaders and elected officials who always blindly supported Noll swallowed his explanation hook line and sinker. I guess they forgot that his 30 plant closings had occurred long before the economy was “bleak,” and that he had moved over 15,000 U.S. jobs out of the country while our economy was strong. Winston-Salem Chamber of Commerce president Gayle Anderson defended Noll, telling the Winston-Salem Journal’s Richard Craver that HanesBrands continues to support the local economy with, “leadership and volunteerism.”

Leadership and volunteerism? First of all, corporate greed is not leadership; stripping retirees of their subsidized medical benefits is not leadership. Second, what exactly is the economic value of having thousands of unemployed volunteers in the community? And by the way, in the course of cutting jobs, HanesBrands abused the spirit of the Federal Trade Adjustment and Assistance Act, by filing claims on behalf of the employees they screwed and expecting taxpayers to foot the bill for up to 156 weeks of training.

This month’s local layoffs come on the heels of the 560 jobs that HanesBrands already eliminated in Forsyth County last year. It’s no surprise then that nearly 90% of the company’s total workforce is now located outside of the United States and in countries with poor standards of living. That means HanesBrands can pay slave wages for the manufacture of underwear that they then ship back to America and attempt to sell to their former employees, providing those folks can afford to buy the underwear that they used to make. Now that’s what I call leadership and commitment to community.

 
 


Remembering Joe Dudley

Posted February 13, 2024 By Triad Today
Joe Dudley

Joe Dudley
Joe Dudley grew up in rural North Carolina, living in a small house with his ten siblings. His pronounced speech impediment prompted Joe’s first grade teacher to label him mentally retarded, and he was held back. It would be the last time anyone would hold Joe back. Within 20 years he had founded one of the most successful minority-owned businesses in America. My friend Joe Dudley passed away on February 8. He was 86 years old.

I first met Joe back in 2006 when he was a guest on Triad Today. He made a number of subsequent appearances on my show, as did his wife Eunice and daughter Ursula. Eunice helped start Dudley Beauty Products and today, Ursula runs the company, which has customers all over the world.

In 1998, Joe penned a book, which can best be described as a combination autobiography and self-help primer for entrepreneurs. “I am, I Can, I Will: Walking By Faith” should be on the bedside table of every aspiring business person. Joe dedicated the book to his mentor S.B. Fuller, a self-made African American business owner whose biography accurately describes Fuller as a “Pioneer in Black Economic Development.”

The cover of Joe Dudley's book, I am, I Can, I Will: Walking By Faith
Joe credits his success to Mr. Fuller and writes about him in “Walking By Faith.”

“Mr. Fuller believed that through hard work any obstacle could be overcome. It reinforced my notion that I could overcome the characterizations that plagued my childhood. I didn’t have to be mentally retarded. I didn’t have to be slow. I didn’t have to let a speech impediment stop me from speaking in public. The world had no limit as long as I worked hard. Mr. Fuller was good at giving hope and encouragement.”

Both Joe and Eunice began by opening a Fuller distributorship, then when inventory was in short supply, the power couple started selling their own products under the Dudley name, and the rest is history.

Upon learning of Joe’s passing, I went back and watched some of the Triad Today segments we did together, and one of my favorite episodes is from April of 2007. It was vintage Joe Dudley as he offered his take on the importance of saving money.

Jim: This is financial literacy month and I’m reminded that more and more local school systems are working with folks like Consumer Credit Counseling and area banks to offer financial literacy instruction to students. I know you agree that we need to give kids practical experience early on, right?

Joe: Absolutely. I think that’s very important. I started saving money early. I used to put pennies and dimes in a little can, where I couldn’t take it out, and that was the beginning of what we do in our business. We insist that everybody should save some money every week, every pay period. Because if you save money, it gives you self-control and confidence in that you have more than you did last year, last month, last week.

Jim: Do you come across kids who need to know and want to know about things like how to save?

Joe: Absolutely and they need to start saving now. So many people get themselves messed up because they don’t know how to balance a checkbook. They don’t know how to use credit properly, don’t know how to get a car loan or home loan, and they need to know these things as early as they possibly can.

Jim: Recent studies show that the average household owes about $12,000 dollars in credit card debt. Why is this happening?

Joe: Well, people to some degree don’t know how to manage their money and they spend more than they make. I tell people, “You’re alright if you spend less than you make.” Nobody makes you spend more than you make. You have to have some discipline and you have to work on it. One young woman said to another, “I don’t want to work for Dudley,” and the other lady said, “WHY?” and she said, “because he makes you save money” (laughs).

Jim: How much money did you have when you started out?

Joe: I started out with $10, and now we’ve built a business all over the world. I just got back from Malaysia and Japan and we built it all on $10. But it was something more than that. I saved money in spite of everything, I don’t care what it was. I don’t care how much it was. I went into the bank once and just put 50 cents in my account. People look at me and say, “there’s something wrong with that guy”, but I knew one thing. I was forming a habit of saving.

Jim: If I give you $10 right now, can you make millions for me?

Joe: (laughs) I wish I could (laughs).

Jim: Oh, so now you’re backing up! I offered to give you $10, and now Mr. Philosophy is backing out on me.

Joe: Well, I can show you how to put that $10 into something else.

Jim: I’m not disciplined enough for that. You’re going to have to leave now.

Joe: (laughs)

Joe Dudley did help others learn to save money and learn self-assurance. He helped jump start careers and made it possible for some folks who worked for him to start their own business. And so, what he inscribed in my copy of his book is, to say the least, ironic. He wrote, “To Jim. Thank you for all the good you do.” It’s an inscription that we all should have written to Joe.

 
 


Suicide by Social Media?

Posted February 6, 2024 By Triad Today
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaks to members of Congress

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaks to members of Congress

Like most folks, I have suffered personal loss. I lost my parents many years ago, and I lost a number of very close friends who left us way too soon. But I’ve never been a parent, so there is no way I can possibly know what it is to lose a child. I can, however, sympathize and empathize with grieving parents, especially when they had no control over the fate of their child. Parents can’t predict that their child will be killed by a drunk driver. Parents can’t prevent a child from getting terminal cancer. Parents can’t stop a drive-by shooting or have x-ray vision to know that candy has been laced with a toxic substance. And parents can’t always know the extent of their child’s mental state or proclivity for committing suicide. Yes, there are signs to look for when a child is emotionally disturbed, such as certain changes in personal habits and behaviors, but parents are often not aware of the triggers that lead their child to take his own life. And that brings me to last week’s Congressional hearing, and the problem of and with social media.

On January 31, the United States Senate Judiciary Committee convened a hearing in which the chief executives of five tech companies were called to testify and be questioned about the dangers of social media on children, particularly teenagers. Appearing were Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Snapchat CEO Evan Spiegel, TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew, Discord CEO Jason Citron, and X CEO Linda Yaccarino. In the gallery sat parents holding up photos of their children who had committed suicide after being affected by content on and messaging through various social media platforms.

The hearing was ostensibly scheduled to address child sexual exploitation facilitated by those online platforms. But it also brought into focus the growing number of teen suicides that parents and politicians blame solely on social media, and which Louisiana Senator John Kennedy referred to as “killing fields of information.” Said Kennedy to the five CEOs, “You have convinced over 2 billion people to give up all of their personal information in exchange for getting to see what their high school friends had for dinner Saturday night.”

Trusting teens who do give up their personal information put themselves at risk for any number of traumatic outcomes including everything from blackmail over nude photos to agreeing to meet a pedophile who they thought was someone their own age. Social media has also been blamed for facilitating cyber bullying which has led many young teens to take their own life. It’s no wonder that Senator Josh Hawley asked if any of the CEOs would like to publicly apologize to the parents in attendance. Zuckerberg stood up, faced the parents, and expressed his regret for the lives lost.

Emotions ran high in the hearing room and for once, both political parties seemed to walk in lockstep, showing compassion for parents and contempt for the CEOs. But as with most all other televised Congressional hearings, this one was for show. It was a chance for senators to simultaneously express sympathy for “victims” of social media, and outrage over the greed of those whose companies profit from social media.

The question is, will anything positive come from the hearing? Sadly, it’s not likely. Similar hearings about school massacres have yielded no substantive gun reforms. For years now I and a handful of elected officials have called for the FCC to regulate social media platforms but to no avail. That’s because Congress is famous for grandstanding then doing nothing. The good news is that in the absence of Congressional action, there is a simple solution for weakening social media’s hold on children and teens. It’s called parental vigilance.

Last year NPR reported that the American Psychological Association recommended parents should closely monitor their children’s social media feed, especially during early adolescence. The APA also said parents should “stop dangerous content that their child is exposed to.” But with apologies to the APA, there are bolder steps parents can take to protect their child. For one, they can issue their kids old-fashioned jitterbug type phones, which do not allow access to the internet. For another, they can block social media sites on their child’s home computer or laptop. These are easy steps to take which merely require parents to be assertive (and protective). That’s why I am a bit frustrated with parents who showed up at last week’s hearing and placed all of the blame on social media for the death of their children. Social media is a tool, but it’s also a weapon the same as a gun. A parent who would never keep a loaded gun in the house has no problem arming their child with smartphones and the ability to access social media and download all sorts of apps.

Predators, blackmailers, and con men will always be with us, but they can’t ply their trade if their intended prey is unreachable. Until such time as tech companies and technology can fully protect kids, then limiting access is a parent’s best defense against the dangers of social media.

 
 


Rigged Elections

Posted January 23, 2024 By Triad Today
ballot box

Graphic of a ballot box

America used to be the envy of the world because of our unwavering commitment to the ideals and practice of democracy. We used to be able to boast that ours is truly a representative form of government. But that boast is no longer credible. That’s because, over the past 20 years, the two-party system has fomented and overseen an unparalleled level of voter suppression.

On the national level, both the Republican National Committee (RNC) and the Democratic National Committee (DNC) have been guilty of skullduggery, especially when it comes to dictating the rules involving Presidential primaries. In 2016, Hillary Clinton was so threatened by the popularity of Bernie Sanders that she stood by as her buddy, DNC Chairperson Debbie Wasserman Schultz, conspired to damage Sanders’ candidacy at every turn.

Leaked emails showed, for example, that the DNC planned to use Bernie’s religion against him in the West Virginia and Kentucky primaries. Schultz also kept in place the Super Delegate system, which Sanders opposed because party hacks could commit to Clinton early on and run up the delegate count.

The RNC is also not above dirty politics either. Just last week it was revealed that the committee secretly drafted a resolution declaring Donald Trump the presumptive nominee after just one primary had occurred. The resolution was withdrawn after it became public knowledge. Meanwhile, the GOP has protected and sustained its own winner-take-all primary system in 20 key states. That makes for a less competitive field and often knocks legitimate challengers out of the race early.

Then there’s the problem of closed primaries. In states with a closed primary, registered Republicans can only vote in the Republican primary, and the same with registered Democrats. In those states, even folks registered as “unaffiliated” aren’t allowed to participate. According to a Lee Enterprises poll, in 2022 among nine states with closed or partially closed Congressional primaries, two in five registered voters in districts where there was a contested race, were barred from casting a ballot. In fact, people were not allowed to choose their own representative in one of every three Congressional districts.

Jeremy Gruber, an attorney for the group Open Primaries which is lobbying to require every state to hold open primaries, told Lee Newspapers, “We’ve allowed the two major political parties to control the process that our tax dollars pay for, and it’s perverted our democracy in all kinds of ways.”

States whose legislatures are controlled by Republicans are especially guilty of perverting our democracy as they seek to suppress the votes of Democrats in general and those in urban areas in particular. Nowhere is that truer than here in North Carolina where the GOP’s most recently drawn gerrymandered Congressional district maps are disenfranchising millions of voters from choosing their own representative.

Here, registered Democrats outnumber registered Republicans, yet in this year’s election, the GOP map will most likely produce a Congressional delegation comprised of 11 Republicans and three Democrats, instead of our current seven and seven. One casualty of gerrymandering is veteran Democratic Congressperson Kathy Manning who decided not to seek re-election after studying the new district boundaries. The 6th district now heavily favors Republican candidates, which is why whoever wins the six-person primary on March 5 will, by default, become our new “representative,” and I use the term loosely.

If we are ever to restore our once great Democratic form of government, then three things have to happen. First, Congress (or the Courts) must require that every state hold open primaries. Second, all primaries must allocate delegates to every candidate according to the votes cast. And third, each state must be required to have in place a truly bi-partisan committee to create Congressional districts that reflect the population. Otherwise for many of us, the concept of “one man, one vote,” is just that — a concept, and not a reality.

 
 


Too Much Dancing in TV Ads

Posted January 16, 2024 By Triad Today
A dancer in a TV commercial for prescription drug Jardiance

Dancers in a TV commercial for prescription drug Jardiance
I have nothing against dancing. In fact, once in junior high my partner and I won a waltz contest. And like most red-blooded American boys of that era, I thought there was something rather sensual about Ginger Rogers and Rita Hayworth pressing the flesh with Fred Astaire. Hell, I was even rooting for Maria and Captain Von Trapp to make out while doing the Laendler. On-screen or in real life, dancing is a beautiful expression of friendship and love, and an outlet for fun. It’s what most toddlers do the first time they hear snappy music, and as we get older, we dance at wedding receptions, parties, and nightclubs. Dancing is in our blood. That’s why Dancing With the Stars is one of the most popular programs on television. My beef isn’t with dancing, it’s with the plethora of corny TV commercials that have come to rely on dancing to sell products that have nothing to do with dancing.   

Truth is, dancing has been used in TV advertisements since the 1950s, but it has become overused since the early part of this century. Today people appearing in TV ads seem to break into dance moves at the drop of a hat, regardless of the product they are hawking.

Beverage ads are among the biggest offenders. A girl drinking Sun Drop cola dances from scene to scene, interrupting people who are doing yoga on the beach. A guy opens a bottle of Coca-Cola in a convenience store and starts dancing to other locations, including into someone’s bedroom where kids are playing video games, and on a rooftop where some guys are watching a soccer match. A young man is put on hold, so while waiting to be connected, he and his wife start dancing because they like Bud Light. Guys in a barber shop get up and start dancing in the street, then dance over to a laundromat, then suddenly they are at the beach. The reason? Because Bicardi “Moves you.” A flash mob gathers in a hotel lobby where they spontaneously break into a rip-off of “Thriller”… Why? Because they all drink Lipton Ice Tea. And who knew that babies start dancing when given a bottle of Evian to sip on? 

Food ads are also filled with dancing. In one spot, a Fig Newton mascot entices us to eat him by dancing the “Fig Newton Dance.” Meanwhile, animated characters dance with joy because they just called Grub Hub. And we’re prompted to shop at Whole Foods because their stores feature a cut-out of two people dancing in front of fully stocked shelves.

Automobile manufacturers also rely on dancing to sell their products. In one ad Toyota featured a disco dance party, and in another, a customer breaks into a maniacal dance just because there’s a sale going on. Volkswagen once transformed Gene Kelly into a hip-hop hoofer, and Kia used dancing bears who performed to “Gangnam Style” music.

Smartphones and cellular companies are no strangers to the dance craze either. They have included Samsung and T-Mobile which featured flash mobs, and Nextel where folks at a dance party love their phone service.

But the most obnoxious TV commercials are for weight loss medicines. Jardiance features a postal carrier who walks past a bunch of people hanging around an outdoor fountain. Suddenly the mob starts dancing because they are excited about diabetes. Sensa even brings law enforcement into their act. In one spot a police officer is suddenly surrounded by a mob of people dancing in front of a courthouse. The judge then comes outside and commences to perform cartwheels, all because he heard about a salt shaker that cuts calories. But the champion of dancing-themed TV commercials is Ozempic. In every spot, crowds of people gyrate as they sing “Oh, oh, oh, Ozempic!” Having tried Ozempic myself I can tell you that “Oh, oh, oh” refers to what you scream as you try to make it to the bathroom.

I suppose that TV spots featuring people dancing for no reason are harmless so long as the dancers are drinking Coca-Cola, or attending a sale at the Kia dealership. But such nonsense is frivolous and misleading when it comes to life-threatening diseases like diabetes, arthritis, COPD and obesity, and I’m not the only one who is bothered by this. Social media is replete with folks who are offended by this kind of television advertising.

Someone on Reddit named Dandle recently posted:

“There are currently more than 19,000 prescription drugs approved for marketing in the U.S….too many of those ad campaigns are created by agencies gunning for recognition at industry award shows rather than engaging appropriate audiences with helpful and relevant information about an available treatment for a specific health condition. Awards go to the spots with mascots and song and dance numbers, not to the earnest and measured summaries of scientific information.”

Dancing can be lots of fun, but there’s just nothing funny about our health. The ad agencies who put this crap on TV should be ashamed, or at least be made to scream on the way to the bathroom.